![\"\"](\"http:\/\/i120.photobucket.com\/albums\/o190\/francescarnau\/relats\/052-Lmina24ErnstHaeckel.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Hab\u00edamos visto en la obra Gald\u00f3s and Darwin de\u00a0 T E Bell que la obra de Darwin ven\u00eda a confirmar cient\u00edficamente (o pseudo-cient\u00edficamente seg\u00fan se interprete la ciencia) la idea de progreso<\/a>. Con Ernest Haeckel la cosa va todav\u00eda m\u00e1s lejo<\/strong>s. En la misma obra T E Bell incluye la cita de un libro de Thomas Glick en el que se lee:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The positivists were sensitive to hard arguments based in the biological sciences; but they seem to have preferred Haeckel to Darwin because the former spoke more directly to the extension of Darwinian models to the social sciences, the prime area of concern to the Spanish positivists. A series of articles by or about Haeckel appeared in the pages of the Revista Contempor\u00e1nea and Revista Europea in the later 1870s. The message was more or less the same in all: Haeckel had created a total system that explained the evolutionary development of the cosmos.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n (Los positivistas eran sensibles a los argumentos duros basados en las ciencias biol\u00f3gicas, pero parecen haber preferido Haeckel a Darwin porque el primero habla m\u00e1s directamente para la extensi\u00f3n de los modelos darwinianos a las ciencias sociales, la principal \u00e1rea de preocupaci\u00f3n para los positivistas espa\u00f1oles. Una serie de art\u00edculos escritos por o sobre Haeckel apareci\u00f3 en las p\u00e1ginas de la Revista Contempor\u00e1nea y Revista Europea en la \u00faltima d\u00e9cada de 1870. El mensaje era m\u00e1s o menos igual\u00a0 en todos: Haeckel hab\u00eda creado un sistema total que explica el desarrollo evolutivo del cosmos.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Referencias<\/strong><\/p>\n Thomas F. Glick, The Comparative Reception of Darwinism <\/em>(Austin: University of Texas, 1972), pp. 311\u201312.<\/p>\n Gald\u00f3s and Darwin. T E Bell. Colecci\u00f3n T\u00e1mesis. Serie A Monograf\u00edas.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Hab\u00edamos visto en la obra Gald\u00f3s and Darwin de\u00a0 T E Bell que la obra de Darwin ven\u00eda a confirmar cient\u00edficamente (o pseudo-cient\u00edficamente seg\u00fan se interprete la ciencia) la idea de progreso. Con Ernest Haeckel la cosa va todav\u00eda m\u00e1s lejos. En la misma obra T E Bell incluye la cita de un libro de Thomas Glick en el que se lee: The positivists were sensitive to hard arguments based in the biological sciences; but they seem to have preferred Haeckel to Darwin because the former spoke more directly to the extension of Darwinian models to the social\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[467,449,488,498,513,22586],"tags":[2286,6710],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":4}},"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\tImagen Kunstformen der Natur d’Ernst Haeckel. (L\u00e0mina 24)<\/small><\/em>. Tomada de Relats en Catal\u00e1<\/a>.<\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"