{"id":135487,"date":"2012-11-07T08:00:21","date_gmt":"2012-11-07T06:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/?p=135487"},"modified":"2014-03-28T10:23:12","modified_gmt":"2014-03-28T08:23:12","slug":"criticos-de-darwin-h","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/2012\/11\/07\/135487","title":{"rendered":"Cr\u00edticos de Darwin: H"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

H<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Haines, David<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

By far, this is one of the clearest treatments of Darwinian evolution and the problems inherent in it. Gilson takes us through a history of the development of the idea of \u00abevolution\u00bb and notes that, even though evolutionists have been ardent enemies of the notion of final causality (teleology) they have been incapable of escaping the\u00a0 necessity of an end, even in the ambiguous notion of natural selection.<\/p>\n

(Por el momento este es uno de los tratamientos m\u00e1s claros de la evoluci\u00f3n darwiniana y de sus problemas inherentes. Gilson nos lleva a trav\u00e9s del desarrollo de la idea \u00abEvoluci\u00f3n\u00bb notando que,\u00a0 a pesar de que los evolucionistas han sido enemigos ardientes de la noci\u00f3n de causalidad final (teleolog\u00eda) han sido incapaces de evitar la necesidad de un fin, ni siquiera con la ambigua noci\u00f3n de Selecci\u00f3n Natural.)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Comentario al libro From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again: A Journey in Final Causality, Species and Evolution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Haughton, Samuel (1821-1897)<\/strong><\/h1>\n

This speculation of Mess. Darwin and Wallace would not be worthy of note were it not for the weight of authority of the names under whose auspices it has been brought forward. If it means what it says, it is a truism; if it means anything more, it is contrary to fact.<\/h2>\n

(Esta especulaci\u00f3n de Mr Darwin y Mr Wallace no merecer\u00eda menci\u00f3n alguna si no fuese por el peso de la autoridad de los nombres bajo cuyos auspicios se ha emitido. Si significa lo que dice es un truismo; si significa algo m\u00e1s, entonces es contraria a los hechos)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Hellewig, Jon<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

Maybe he invented the ridiculous (conceptual) theory of natural selection precisely to find something original to say, or maybe he did not invent it for that reason, but expanded it as he saw this as his chance to be original. It is clear that he understood that in reality Lamarck had discovered the evolutionary principles in all essentials, and he\u00a0 did not want to give Lamarck credit for it.<\/em><\/p>\n

( Puede que (Darwin)\u00a0 inventase la rid\u00edcula (conceptual) teor\u00eda de selecci\u00f3n natural precisamente para encontrar algo original que decir, o tal vez no la invent\u00f3 para eso, sino que la expandi\u00f3 viendo en ello su posibilidad de ser original. Lo que est\u00e1 claro es que entendi\u00f3 que Lamarck hab\u00eda descubierto toda la esencia de los principios de la evoluci\u00f3n, y no quer\u00eda darle cr\u00e9dito por ello.)<\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n


\n<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Ho, Wing Meng<\/h1>\n

Methodological Issues in Evolutionary Theory with Special Reference to Darwinism and Lamarckism<\/em>. 1965. Oxford, Bodleian Library, Universidad de Oxford. (Notaci\u00f3n bibliogr\u00e1fica: Ms. D. Phil. d. 3591. Para pedidos de reproducci\u00f3n fotogr\u00e1fica, n(o) BPC 7442, Oxford University Press.)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/h1>\n

Ho, Mae-Wan (1941-\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 )<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

Much of the problem is that neo-Darwinism appears completely invincible to falsification by observations or by experiments, so much so that many doubt if it is a scientific theory at all.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

(Gran parte del problema consiste en que el neo-darwinismo aparece como completamente invencible a la falsaci\u00f3n por observaciones o experimentos, tanto que muchos dudan si se trata de una teor\u00eda cient\u00edfica)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cBeyond neo- Darwinism – An Epigenetic Approach to Evolution\u201d\u00a0 Journal of Theoretical Biology\u00a0 Vol. 78, 1979\u00a0 p.574<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

El dogma central parece ser una justificaci\u00f3n directa de la teor\u00eda del germoplasma de Weismann, que desde entonces se conoce como la \u00abbarrera de Weismann\u00bb. Se supone que esta barrera proh\u00edbe estrictamente que las influencias ambientales, o cualquier experiencia durante la vida del organismo, afecte en forma directa (es decir, predeciblemente) sus genes, en especial en las c\u00e9lulas germinales, por lo que las \u00abcaracter\u00edsticas adquiridas\u00bb no se heredan.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Mae-Wan Ho, 1988, Genetic engineering<\/em>, Trad.: Jos\u00e9 \u00c1ngel \u00c1lvarez, Editorial Gedisa SA 2001<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Hodge, Charles (1797-1878)
\n<\/strong><\/h1>\n

No es, sin embargo, ni la evoluci\u00f3n ni la selecci\u00f3n natural, lo que da al darwinismo su peculiar car\u00e1cter e importancia. Es el hecho de que Darwin rechaza toda teleolog\u00eda, o la doctrina de las causas finales. Niega dise\u00f1o en cualquiera de los organismos en el mundo vegetal o animal. \u00c9l ense\u00f1a que el ojo se form\u00f3 sin ning\u00fan prop\u00f3sito de producir un \u00f3rgano de la visi\u00f3n.<\/p>\n

Ser\u00eda absurdo decir nada irrespetuoso de un hombre como el Sr. Darwin, y no menos absurdo permitirse extravagancias del lenguaje, sin embargo, estamos expresando nuestra propia experiencia, cuando decimos que consideramos los libros de Darwin la mejor refutaci\u00f3n de la teor\u00eda de Darwin.<\/em> Constantemente nos indica la alternativa de tener que decidir entre creer que el ojo es o bien un producto de dise\u00f1o o el producto de la acci\u00f3n involuntaria de causas f\u00edsicas ciegas.<\/em> Para cualquier mente normalmente constituida, es absolutamente imposible creer que no es un producto de dise\u00f1o. Para Darwin mismo, es evidente, a\u00fan a pesar de su teor\u00eda, apenas puede creerlo.<\/em><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Hofstadter, Richard(1916-1970)<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Una cierta y conmovedora iron\u00eda surge en el pensamiento de que, mientras que escritores como estos predicaron el cambio lento e instaron a los hombres para adaptarse al medio ambiente, los mismos millonarios a quienes consideraban \u201cm\u00e1s aptos\u201d en la lucha por la existencia, estaban transformando el medio ambiente con una incre\u00edble rapidez y volviendo los valores de los Spencer y los Summers de este mundo constantemente cada vez menos aptos para la supervivencia.<\/em><\/p>\n

There is a certain touching irony in the thought that, while writers like these preached slow change and urged men to adapt to the environment, the very millionaires whom they took to be the \u201cfittest\u201d in the struggle for existence, were transforming the environment with incredible rapidity and rendering the values of the Spencers and Summers of this world constantly less and less fit for survival.<\/em><\/p>\n

Introduction to \u201cSocial Darwinism in American Thought\u201d. \u00a0Beacon Press Boston Revised Ed 1955 (First edited in 1944).<\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

Hostetter, Carl<\/h1>\n

An excellent if at times somewhat abstruse book (mostly a product of the now somewhat remote context in which it was written). Ably demonstrates the incoherence of Darwinism (proper) and refutes the notion that evolution (which term the author shows is a misnomer, and one almost never used by Darwin himself) disproves Aristotelian finalism.<\/p>\n

Un excelente si a veces algo abstruso libro (en su mayor\u00eda un producto del contexto ahora algo remoto en que fue escrito). H\u00e1bilmente demuestra la incoherencia del darwinismo (propiamente dicho) y rechaza\u00a0 la idea de que la evoluci\u00f3n (t\u00e9rmino que el autor muestra es un nombre inapropiado, y uno que casi ni el propio Darwinusa) refuta el finalismo aristot\u00e9lico.<\/p>\n

Comentario al libro From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again: A Journey in Final Causality, Species and Evolution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Horn, Henry Stainken<\/h1>\n

The greatest homage that can be paid to an empirical theory is the constructive criticism that makes it obsolete at an early age.<\/em><\/p>\n

(El mayor homenaje que se puede hacer a una teor\u00eda emp\u00edrica es la cr\u00edtica constructiva que la hace obsoleta a una edad temprana.)<\/p>\n

The Adaptive Geometry of Trees. Preface. 1971.<\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Howells, William (1908-2005)<\/strong><\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00abIt can be said right away that this view of Darwin’s is out of date. Evolution is not as simple as that, and natural selection, which once bore all before it, is no longer accepted by naturalists generally as the only key, or even the main one . . . The naturalists are, in fact, still pretty much in the dark . . . Moreover, some of the evidence of Darwin and his followers has been found faulty<\/strong>, and the reality of certain things which he assumed, such as the severity of the struggle for existence, is in doubt . . . Darwin was somewhat mistaken as to the source of the raw materials from which selection picks and chooses . . . You might, therefore propose to say that Darwin was wrong<\/strong>\u00ab. <\/em><\/p>\n

(Se puede decir de inmediato que esta visi\u00f3n de Darwin est\u00e1 pasada de moda. La evoluci\u00f3n no es tan simple como eso, y la selecci\u00f3n natural, que antes todo lo explicaba, ya no es aceptada por los naturalistas en general, como la clave \u00fanica ni la principal. . . Los naturalistas est\u00e1n, de hecho, todav\u00eda casi en la oscuridad. . . Por otra parte, algunas de las pruebas de Darwin y sus seguidores ha sido insuficientese, y la realidad de ciertas cosas que \u00e9l asumi\u00f3, como la gravedad de la lucha por la existencia, est\u00e1 en duda. . . Darwin se equivoc\u00f3 un poco en cuanto al origen de las materias primas entre\u00a0 las cuales la selecci\u00f3n\u00a0 escoge. . . Es posible\u00a0 decir, por lo tanto,\u00a0 que Darwin estaba equivocado \u00ab.)<\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Hunter, Cornelius<\/h1>\n

Darwin was not simply applying his theory to a set of observations. He was not illustrating how evolution might have formed these species. Rather, Darwin was building an argument for natural selection. But in constructing his argument, he presupposed that the species had evolved.<\/p>\n

Darwin was unquestionably an expert on barnacles, and he could present a detailed example of highly-modified species that most people have never even heard of. But Darwin begs the question when he says that the unique structures of the Ibla <\/em>and Proteolepas <\/em>evolved and therefore natural selection can effect such changes.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

(Darwin no estaba simplemente aplicando su teor\u00eda a un conjunto de observaciones. \u00c9l no estaba ilustrando c\u00f3mo la evoluci\u00f3n pudo haber formado estas especies. Por el contrario, Darwin estaba construyendo un argumento a favor de la selecci\u00f3n natural. Pero en la construcci\u00f3n de su argumento, presupone que las especies hab\u00edan evolucionado.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Darwin fue, sin duda, un experto en percebes, y \u00e9l podr\u00eda presentar un ejemplo detallado de las especies altamente modificadas de las que la mayor\u00eda de la gente nunca ha o\u00eddo hablar. Pero Darwin estropea la cuesti\u00f3n cuando dice que las estructuras \u00fanicas de la Ibla y Proteolepas evolucionado y por lo tanto la selecci\u00f3n natural puede efectuar tales cambios.)<\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Hyndman, Olan (1899-1906)<\/p>\n

\n

In this book, Hyndman calls Darwinism \u201cthe most irrational and illogical explanation of natural phenomena extant.\u201d Yet he says \u201cI have one strong faith, that scientific phenomena are invariable\u2026any exception is an unthinkable as to maintain that thunderbolts are tossed at us by a man-like god named Zeus,\u201d and so he goes on to develop an
\nalternative (essentially Lamarkian) theory of the causes of evolution.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Origin of Life and the Evolution of Living Things,\u201d Olan Hyndman,
\nPhilosophical Library, 1952.<\/p>\n

\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  H   \u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4   Haines, David   By far, this is one of the clearest treatments of Darwinian evolution and the problems inherent in it. Gilson takes us through a history of the development of the idea of \u00abevolution\u00bb and notes that, even though evolutionists have been ardent enemies of the notion of final causality (teleology) they have been incapable of escaping the\u00a0 necessity of an end, even in the ambiguous notion of natural selection. (Por el momento este es uno de los tratamientos m\u00e1s claros de la evoluci\u00f3n darwiniana y de sus problemas inherentes. Gilson nos lleva a\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[467,14313,1],"tags":[22773],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":4}},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135487"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135487"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135487\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":135489,"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135487\/revisions\/135489"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}