{"id":135603,"date":"2012-11-27T08:00:25","date_gmt":"2012-11-27T06:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/?p=135603"},"modified":"2012-10-16T17:15:39","modified_gmt":"2012-10-16T15:15:39","slug":"criticos-de-darwin-y","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.madrimasd.org\/blogs\/biologia_pensamiento\/2012\/11\/27\/135603","title":{"rendered":"Cr\u00edticos de Darwin: Y"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

Y<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Young, Robert M.\u00a0 (1935-\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 )<\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

Darwin says, \u00abThis little abstract touches only the accumulative powers of natural selection, which I look at as by far the most important element in the production of new forms.\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0Anthropomorphic, voluntarist descriptions of natural selection occur throughout On the Origin of Species, the abstract of the larger work, which appeared at the end of 1859. It will help to sharpen our sense of how remarkable this is if it is recalled that the rules of scientific explanation which were developed in the seventeenth century banished purposes, intentions, and anthropomorphic had expressions from scientific explanations. Biologists, however, had never been very good at confining their explanations to matter, motion, and number. They had persisted in employing powers and faculties and had moved on to slightly less septic categories such as biological properties (e.g., irritability, contractility, sensibility) in spite of the official paradigm. But even by the loose standards of biological explanation, it is surprising to find such rank anthropomorphism at the heart of the most celebrated unifying theory in biology.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Dice Darwin: \u00abEste peque\u00f1o res\u00famen trata \u00a0s\u00f3lo de los poderes acumulativos de la selecci\u00f3n natural, a los cu\u00e1les miro, con mucho, como \u00a0el elemento m\u00e1s importante en la producci\u00f3n de nuevas formas.\u00bb<\/p>\n

Descripciones antropom\u00f3rficas, voluntaristas de la selecci\u00f3n natural se producen a lo largo de El Origen de las Especies, el resumen de la obra m\u00e1s grande, que apareci\u00f3 a finales de 1859. Ayudar\u00e1 a agudizar nuestro sentido de lo extraordinario que es esto si se recuerda que las reglas de la explicaci\u00f3n cient\u00edfica que se desarrollaron en el siglo XVII desterraron todo \u00a0prop\u00f3sito, intenci\u00f3n, y expresiones antropom\u00f3rficas de las explicaciones cient\u00edficas. Los bi\u00f3logos, sin embargo, nunca fueron muy buenos en limitar sus explicaciones a la materia, el movimiento y el n\u00famero. Ellos hab\u00edan persistido en el empleo de poderes y facultades traslad\u00e1ndolos a categor\u00edas un poco menos s\u00e9pticas tales como las propiedades biol\u00f3gicas (por ejemplo, la irritabilidad, la contractilidad, la sensibilidad), a pesar del paradigma oficial. Pero incluso para los est\u00e1ndares relajados de explicaci\u00f3n biol\u00f3gica, es sorprendente encontrar tal rango de antropomorfismo en el coraz\u00f3n de la teor\u00eda unificadora m\u00e1s c\u00e9lebre en la biolog\u00eda.<\/p>\n

Darwin’s Metaphor:<\/big><\/a>
\n Nature’s Place in Victorian Culture<\/big><\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Y     \u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4\u00f8,\u00b8\u00b8,\u00f8\u00a4\u00ba\u00b0`\u00b0\u00ba\u00a4   Young, Robert M.\u00a0 (1935-\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 )   Darwin says, \u00abThis little abstract touches only the accumulative powers of natural selection, which I look at as by far the most important element in the production of new forms.\u00bb \u00a0Anthropomorphic, voluntarist descriptions of natural selection occur throughout On the Origin of Species, the abstract of the larger work, which appeared at the end of 1859. It will help to sharpen our sense of how remarkable this is if it is recalled that the rules of scientific explanation which were developed in the seventeenth century banished purposes, intentions, and\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[467,14303,14313,14304],"tags":[22773],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":4}},"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t