En el arte, la literatura o, en general, en múltiples registros históricos se pueden encontrar referencias a eventos astronómicos, tanto de manera explicita como más sutil. Son de gran interés porque permiten dar fechas exactas (como es el caso de eclipses avistados durante alguna batalla en la Antigüedad), pero también proporcionan la visión de aquellas sociedad de diferentes tipos de eventos. Normalmente para interpretarlos es necesario un astrónomo, o al menos cierto grado de conocimiento de la astronomía. El proceso es casi una disección forense, que examina  los detalles aparentemente más nimios para extraer una visión global.

 

 

«Catastrofe Ultravioleta» nos presenta «Sidereus», un interesante podcast sobre los astrónomos forenses. Según la introducción de su página web: «El trabajo de un «astrónomo forense» consiste en investigar los cielos que aparecen en las obras de arte e identificar los astros que aparecen. ¿Te apetece visitar el Museo del Prado para verlo con los ojos de un astrónomo?»

Sí, se trata de mirar un cuadro o leer un poema desde otra perspectiva, viendo otras caras de la realidad. Un interesante programa en el que he tenido el placer de colaborar contando la historia de Cervantes y el nombre de los satélites de Júpiter. Animo a escucharlo.

 

 

«Catástrofe Ultravioleta es un programa de Javier Peláezy Antonio Martínez Ron.

 

 

 

Compartir:

807 comentarios

  1. Useful enough to recommend to several people I know who would appreciate it, and a stop at directionalthinking added more material I will pass along too, the kind of writing that earns word of mouth is the kind that actually delivers on its promises which is what this site does without any drama or fanfare attached.

  2. A quiet piece that did not try to compete on volume, and a look at visiontrajectory maintained that selective approach, sites that publish less but better are increasingly rare in an environment that rewards volume and this one has clearly chosen quality cadence over quantity which is a brave editorial decision in current conditions.

  3. If you scroll past this site without looking carefully you will miss something, and a stop at focuscreatesenergy extended that mild warning, the surface of the site does not advertise its quality loudly which means careful attention is required to recognise what is being offered here which is itself a kind of editorial signal.

  4. Comfortable read, finished it without realising how much time had passed, and a look at strategictrustnetwork pulled me into more pages the same way, the absence of friction in good content lets time disappear and that is one of the highest compliments I can pay any piece of writing I find online during a regular search session.

  5. Closed the tab feeling I had spent the time well, and a stop at claritydrivesdecisions extended that feeling across more pages, the test of whether time on a site was well spent is one I apply silently after closing tabs and very few sites pass it but this one passed it cleanly today afternoon clearly.

  6. Did not expect much when I clicked through but ended up reading the whole thing carefully, and a stop at directionalpathfinder kept that engagement going, sometimes the unassuming sites turn out to deliver more than the flashy ones which is something I have learned to look out for over time online lately and across topics.

  7. A genuinely unexpected highlight of my reading week, and a look at claritydrive extended that pattern, the surprise of finding excellent content rather than the predictable mediocre is one of the few real pleasures of casual web browsing and this site delivered that surprise cleanly today which I really do appreciate.

Deja un comentario