David Barrado y Navascués

Seguimos con la discusión sobre qué es y qué no es un planeta…

La reunión de la asamblea general de la Unión Astronómica Internacional continua en Praga. En los diferentes corrillos domina la conversación sobre la propuesta de definición del término «planeta«. Me comentan que el disgusto de un número significativo de astrónomos es grande, el desacuerdo es evidente.  La política domina. El sector americano insiste en conservar el status para Plutón, y garantizarlo para 2003 UB(313), ambos descubiertos por americanos, de manera que el Sistema Solar contendría doce planetas en lugar de los nueve tradicionales (o los ocho si se eliminase a Plutón de la lista, opción que yo apoyo). El lobby funciona a diferentes niveles. Un ejemplo, artículo de Gibor Basri y Mike Brown (descubridor de 2003 UB) en astro-ph, el repositorio de  artículos astronómicos, esta misma mañana.

Mientas tanto, una propuesta alternativa adquiere más y más fuerza. La votación será este mismo jueves.

Propuesta alternativa, que traduciré a lo largo de la mañana (cortesía de Javier Licandro):

New proposal for Resolution 5: Definition of a Planet

(1) A planet is a celestial body that (a) is by far the largest object in its local population [1], (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape [2], (c) does not produce energy by any nuclear fusion mechanism [3].

(2) According to point (1) the eight classical planets discovered before 1900, which move in nearly circular orbits close to the ecliptic plane are the only planets of our Solar System. All the other objects in orbit around the Sun are smaller than Mercury. We recognize that there are objects that fulfill the criteria (b) and (c) but not criterion (a). Those objects are defined as «dwarf» planets. Ceres as well as Pluto and several other large Trans-Neptunian objects belong to this category. In contrast to the planets, these objects typically have highly inclined orbits and/or large eccentricities.


(3) All the other natural objects orbiting the Sun that do not fulfill any of the previous criteria shall be referred to collectively as “Small Solar System Bodies”.[4]

PD: Traducción de la propuesta alternativa.

Un planeta es un objeto celeste que:
a) es el de mayor objeto de la población local,
b) contiene suficiente masa como para que su fuerza de gravedad sea dominante, de manera que se encuentre en equilibrio hidrostático,
c) no produce energía a partir de reacciones nucleares de fusión.

ENLACES:
Planetas: preguntas y respuestas de la IAU

Más en:
El baile de los planetas
El baile de los planetas (II)
 El baile de los planetas (III)
¿Qué es un planeta?…

Compartir:

418 comentarios

  1. Now appreciating that the post left me with enough to say in a follow up conversation, and a look at forwardenergyreleased added more material for those follow ups, content that prepares me for related conversations rather than just informing me alone is content with social utility and this site provides that social armament reliably for me.

  2. A clean piece that knew exactly what it wanted to say and said it, and a look at growthmovesdecisively maintained the same clarity of intention, knowing the goal of a piece before writing is something most blog content lacks and the clarity of purpose here shows up in every paragraph for any careful reader to notice.

  3. Liked the natural conversational tone throughout, never stiff and never overly casual either, and a stop at directionshapesmomentum kept that comfortable middle ground going, finding a tone that respects the reader without becoming distant or overly familiar is harder than it sounds and this site nails that balance consistently across many different pieces.

  4. Solid stuff, the kind of post that I will probably refer back to later this month when the topic comes up again, and a look at actioncreatesforwardpath only confirmed I should bookmark the site as a whole rather than just this single page for future reference and use across coming weeks.

  5. Most attempts at writing on this topic feel like they are missing something and this post finally identified what was missing, and a look at focusenergizesprogress extended that diagnostic clarity, content that names what is wrong with adjacent treatments while doing better itself is content with both critical and constructive value and this site has both.

  6. A piece that handled the topic with appropriate weight without becoming portentous, and a look at focusguidesmomentum continued that calibrated seriousness, content that takes itself seriously without becoming pompous is something this site has clearly figured out and the balance shows up in every piece I have read across multiple sessions now.

  7. Now adjusting my expectations upward for the topic based on this post, and a stop at ideasbuildmomentum continued that bar raising effect, content that resets what I think is possible on a subject is doing real work in shaping my standards and this site is providing those bar raising experiences at a notable rate during sessions.

  8. One of the more thoughtful posts I have read recently on this topic, and a stop at directionamplifiesgrowth added even more weight to that impression, this is genuinely good content that holds its own against far better known sites in the same space without trying to imitate any of them at all which I appreciate.

  9. One of the more honest takes on the topic I have seen lately, no spin and no oversell, and a stop at clarityenablesmovement kept that going, the kind of voice the open web could use a lot more of rather than the endless echo chamber of recycled opinions floating around every social platform these days.

  10. My reading list is short and selective and this site is now on it, and a stop at kerrijohnson confirmed the placement, the short list of sites I read deliberately rather than encounter accidentally is something I curate carefully and adding to it is a real act of trust which this site has earned today.

  11. Picked this up while looking for something else and ended up reading every paragraph because it was actually informative, and after actionfuelsforward I was sure I would come back, that does not happen often when most sites bury the useful parts under endless ads and pop ups today and across most categories online.

  12. The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at actionbuildsflow kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.

  13. A piece that was confident enough to leave some questions open rather than forcing closure, and a look at progresswithoutfriction continued that intellectual honesty, content that admits the limits of its scope is more trustworthy than content that pretends to total understanding and this site has the right calibration on certainty consistently.

  14. Appreciated how the writer anticipated the questions a reader might have along the way, and a stop at clarityturnsaction continued that thoughtful approach, you can tell when content has been edited with the reader in mind versus just published as a first draft and this is clearly the former approach across what I read.

  15. Took something from this I did not expect to find, and a stop at focusunlocksmotion added another unexpected useful piece, content that exceeds expectations rather than just meeting them is the kind that builds enthusiasm and earns repeat visits without any explicit ask from the writer or platform behind the work being read.

  16. Closed it feeling slightly more competent in the topic than I started, and a stop at directionturnskeys reinforced that competence boost, real learning is rare in casual online reading but it does happen sometimes and this site managed to make it happen for me today which is genuinely worth pausing to acknowledge.

  17. Really grateful for content like this, it does not waste my time and it does not insult my intelligence either, and a quick look at progresswithclaritypath was the same, balanced respectful writing that makes a person feel welcome rather than rushed through pages of forced engagement just to keep clicking around.

  18. Reading this on a long flight and finding it the best thing I read across hours of trying, and a stop at signalpowersmovement kept the streak going, when content beats long flight reading you know it has substance because flight reading is a hard test of a piece given the alternatives available everywhere.

Deja un comentario