El próximo vuelo del Discovery y la Astrofísica Espacial
Miguel Mas Hesse
LAEFF-CSIC
Dentro de unas semanas será lanzado de nuevo el «Space Shuttle» Discovery, de la NASA, camino de la Estación Espacial Internacional (ISS). El éxito de este vuelo es fundamental para la investigación espacial en general, ya que los vuelos del Shuttle son necesarios para completar la ISS. Pero el éxito es también imprescindible para el futuro de la Astrofísica Espacial, ya que de él depende el que el Telescopio Espacial Hubble (HST) pueda seguir operativo unos años más.
¿Cómo es posible que nos encontremos en una situación en que tanto el futuro de la ISS como el del HST dependan del lanzamiento de un Space Shuttle, algo que considerábamos trivial hasta hace poco tiempo? Hagamos un poco de historia. El acceso del Hombre al Espacio se materializó en los años 60 del siglo pasado por medio de pequeñas cápsulas presurizadas que eran impulsadas por potentes cohetes. Estas cápsulas eran muy pequeñas, y en los primeros tiempos tan sólo dejaban espacio para 1 o 2 astronautas sentados, que tenían que permanecer en esa posición durante el desarrollo de la misión. Por el lado americano este concepto llegó a su punto culminante con la combinación de las cápsulas Apollo, que incluían un módulo de servicio más amplio, y los lanzadores Saturno V, fruto del ingenio del hoy ya mítico Wernher von Braun. El Saturno V es el cohete más potente y más fiable (ningún fallo) que ha fabricado el Hombre, más potente incluso que los «Space Shuttle» modernos.
El Apollo 13 en su plataforma de lanzamiento
Pero el coste de cada lanzamiento era prohibitivo. Por este motivo, a comienzos de los años 70 NASA decidió desarrollar un sistema de lanzaderas espaciales que fueran potentes, versátiles, y mucho más baratas. El concepto básica fue la capacidad de reutilización, con el objetivo de reducir costes. En el Shuttle se aprovechan casi todos los elementos, excepto el tanque exterior de combustible. Tanto la nave como los motores principales regresan a Tierra y pueden volar múltiples veces. Sin embargo, lo que parecía una buena idea no resultó tan buena después de todo. Para que un Shuttle vuelva a volar repetidamente a lo largo de los años en condiciones de seguridad hacen falta revisiones y mejoras tan profundas que el coste de cada misión sigue siendo muy elevado.
Lanzamiento de la misión Discovery STS141
Los soviéticos optaron por un concepto más clásico: siguieron desarrollando sus cápsulas tipo Soyuz, que son lanzadas por cohetes fabricados en serie a un coste relativamente bajo. En los años 80 intentaron copiar el diseño de los Shuttle americanos, pero su nave Buran acoplada a un cohete Energya sólo realizó un vuelo de prueba. La crisis de la URSS impidió el desarrollo del sistema, pese a sus ventajas.
Los Shuttle americanos han realizado ya numerosas misiones con éxito. Pero desgraciadamente adolecen de defectos de diseño que los hacen más vulnerables de lo que sería aceptable. No olvidemos que el diseño básico es de los años 70 del pasado siglo. El primer defecto grave afectó a los motores de combustible sólido: un error de diseño en unas simples juntas de caucho provocaron que el Challenger estallara durante el lanzamiento en enero de 1986. A pesar de la gravedad del accidente, el defecto era relativamente simple y fue corregido rápidamente. Pero hay otro problema de diseño mucho más serio: el Shuttle despega acoplado al gigantesco depósito de hidrógeno y oxígenos líquidos, que sobresale claramente por encima de la nave. Este depósito se encuentra a temperaturas criogénicas por lo que, a pesar de los aislantes, se forma hielo en su superficie cuando se encuentra en la rampa de lanzamiento. Al encender los motores, gruesos bloques de hielo se desprenden y golpean contra la estructura del Shuttle, produciendo daños en el aislamiento térmico. Este problema ha ocurrido desde los primeros días del Shuttle, y siempre se consideró normal que algunas losetas térmicas se desprendieran. Pero en el último lanzamiento del Columbia, en 2003, un bloque de hielo dañó el borde de ataque de una de las alas. En la reentrada, el gas a altas temperaturas penetró por allí y llevó a la destrucción completa de la nave. Este problema podría haber sucedido, de hecho, en cualquier otro vuelo anterior.
Astronautas realizando operaciones de mantenimiento en el HST en 1997
NASA reaccionó rediseñando el tanque de combustible. Durante el último vuelo del Discovery el pasado otoño se probó el nuevo diseño, pero para desesperación de los ingenieros de NASA, gruesos bloques de hielo volvieron a caer sobre el Shuttle, forzando una reparación en órbita de los paneles dañados. Dentro de unas semanas se procederá a una nueva prueba con el Discovery. En esta ocasión los ingenieros esperan que los problemas se hayan solucionado.
No sólo los ingenieros lo esperan. Mientras el problema no esté bajo control, NASA decidió que los Shuttle sólo volarían a la ISS, de manera que si se detecta algún daño los astronautas podrían refugiarse allí y retornar mediante una cápsula Soyuz que permanece permanentemente atracada. Esto implica que hoy por hoy NASA no autoriza que el Shuttle visite el HST, una visita necesaria para reemplazar los giróscopos e instalar nuevos instrumentos. Sin esta visita será difícil que el HST pueda continuar sus operaciones mucho más allá de 2008. De hecho, sin el empuje periódico del Shuttle, el HST acabará cayendo al océano de manera descontrolada en un plazo relativamente corto.
El Shuttle Discovery atracado en la ISS durante su último vuelo
Esperemos por lo tanto que NASA vuelva a poner en operación su flota de Shuttles, que sean capaces de terminar la construcción de la ISS, y que puedan volver a dejar el HST en condiciones óptimas de funcionamiento dentro de un par de años.
I appreciate the clarity here, everything is explained in simple terms without unnecessary detail, and after a quick stop at strategicalliancelink the points came together nicely for me, the writing keeps things straightforward and respects the reader from start to finish without ever talking down to anyone.
Closed it feeling I had taken something away rather than just consumed something, and a stop at ideasunlockgrowth extended that taking away feeling, the difference between content I extract value from and content I just pass through is something I track informally and this site is consistently in the value extraction column for me.
Thanks for keeping things clear and to the point, that is honestly hard to find online these days, and after reading through signaldrivesclarity the message stayed consistent which makes me trust the information being shared more than I usually do on similar pages that cover this same kind of topic.
Quietly building a case in my head for why this site deserves more attention than it currently seems to receive, and a look at progressmoveswithsignal reinforced the case, the gap between quality and recognition is a recurring frustration in independent online content and this site is one of the cases that seems particularly egregious to me today.
Reading this slowly to give it the attention it deserved, and a stop at actionmapping earned the same slow read, choosing to read slowly is a small act of respect for content quality and very few sites earn that respect from me but this one did so without any explicit ask which is the cleanest way.
I came here looking for a quick answer and ended up reading the whole post because it was actually interesting, and after forwardmomentumhub I had a much fuller picture, no stress and no confusion just a clear walk through the topic that made everything fall into place without much effort.
Quietly the post solved something I had been turning over without quite knowing how to phrase the question, and a look at bondedpathway extended that quiet solving, content that addresses unformulated needs is content with reader insight and this site has demonstrated that insight at a high rate across the pieces I have read recently.
The post made the topic feel approachable without making it feel trivial, that is a fine balance, and a stop at forwardprogression maintained the same balance, finding the middle ground between welcoming and serious is genuinely difficult and the writers here have clearly figured out how to consistently hit it well across many different posts.
Bookmark added with a small note about why, and a look at forwardmotionclarity prompted another bookmark with another note, the bookmarks I annotate are the ones I expect to return to deliberately rather than stumble into and this site is generating annotated bookmarks at a higher rate than my usual content sources by some margin.
Probably this is one of the better quiet successes on the open web at the moment, and a look at foundationalliancebond reinforced that quiet success quality, sites that are doing well without making a noise about doing well are the sites I most respect and this one has clearly chosen the quiet success path consistently throughout.
Felt energised after reading rather than drained, which is unusual for online content these days, and a look at globalpartnerbond continued that good feeling, content that leaves you better than it found you is rare and worth bookmarking when you stumble across it for the first time today or any other day really.
My usual response to new bookmarks is to forget them but this one I have already returned to twice, and a look at ideasintomotion pulled me back a third time, the actual return rate to bookmarked sites is the real measure of value and this one is clearing that measure at a notable rate already.
Stands apart from similar pages by actually being useful, that is high praise these days, and a look at momentumbuildsforward kept that standard going, you can tell when a site is built around the reader versus around metrics and this one clearly belongs to the first category for sure based on what I read.
Honestly impressed by the consistency of voice across what I have read so far, and a quick visit to progressmovesintelligently continued that consistent feel, when a site reads like one careful person rather than a committee the experience is more rewarding for the reader who notices these subtle editorial details over time.
Found this really helpful, the explanations are simple but they actually answer the questions a normal reader would have, and after I followed legacytrustgroup I had a clearer sense of the topic, no extra fluff just useful points laid out in a sensible order that made the time worth it.
Now planning a longer reading session for the archives, and a stop at actionmatrix confirmed the archives are worth that longer commitment, sites with archives I want to read deliberately rather than just sample are rare and this one has clearly earned that level of interest based on the consistency of what I have already read.
This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at strongbusinessalliance kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.
The way the post stayed on topic throughout without going on tangents was really refreshing, and a look at focusvector kept that focused approach going, discipline like this in writing is rare and worth recognising because most writers cannot resist wandering off into related subjects that dilute their main point and confuse readers along the way.
A piece that left me thinking I had been undercaring about the topic, and a look at directionactivatesprogress reinforced that mild concern, content that raises the appropriate weight of a subject without being preachy about it is doing important work and this site is providing that gentle elevation of attention for me consistently.
Recommended without hesitation if you care about careful coverage of this topic, and a stop at growthorientedbond reinforced the recommendation, the bar I set for unhesitating recommendations is fairly high and this site has cleared it through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good pieces rather than through any single standout post which is meaningful.
Bookmark earned, share earned, return visit earned, all from one reading session, and a look at progressmovesnaturally did the same, the trifecta of bookmark and share and return is rare in a single visit and represents the highest level of engagement I tend to offer any piece of online content these days here.
Genuine pleasure to read, and that is not something I say often after a casual click through, and a quick visit to progresswithclearintent kept the same feeling going across the rest of the site, finding writing that actually feels good to spend time with rather than just functional is increasingly rare on the open web.
Now appreciating the small but real way this post improved my afternoon, and a stop at intentionalmomentum extended that small improvement effect, content that produces measurable positive impact on the texture of a reading day is content with real value and this site is producing those small positive impacts at a sustainable rate apparently.
Bookmark folder reorganised slightly to make this site easier to find, and a look at ideaclarity earned the same accessibility upgrade, the small organisational moves I make for sites I expect to return to often are themselves a signal of how much I trust them and this site triggered those moves naturally.
I usually skim posts like these but this one held my attention all the way through, and a stop at ideasflowwithintent did the same, that is a strong endorsement coming from me because I am usually quick to bounce when content gets repetitive or fails to deliver on its initial promise made in the headline.
Closed the laptop and walked away thinking about the post for a good twenty minutes, and a stop at actioncreatesmomentumflow produced similar lingering thoughts, content that survives the closing of the browser tab is content that has actually entered the mind rather than just decorating the screen for the duration of the reading.
Compared to the usual results for this kind of search this site stands well above the average, and a quick visit to growthflowsforwardcleanly kept the standard high, you can tell within seconds whether a site is going to waste your time or actually deliver and this one clearly delivers without any false starts.
Solid endorsement from me, the writing earns it, and a look at corevaluealliance continues to earn it across the broader site too, the kind of operation that maintains quality across many pages rather than just one viral post is a sign of serious commitment and that is what I see here clearly across what I read.
Looking for similar voices elsewhere has come up empty in my recent searches, and a stop at evercorebond extended the search frustration, the rare site that does what no other does in quite the same way is precious and this one has clearly developed a particular approach that I have not been able to find duplicates of.
A relief to read something where I did not have to fact check every claim mentally, and a look at forwardenergyreleased continued that reliable feeling, sites where I can lower my guard and trust the content are rare and this one is earning that trust paragraph by paragraph through consistent careful work behind the scenes.
Closed the laptop and walked away thinking about the post for a good twenty minutes, and a stop at evergreenbondhub produced similar lingering thoughts, content that survives the closing of the browser tab is content that has actually entered the mind rather than just decorating the screen for the duration of the reading.
Closed the laptop after this and let the ideas settle for a few hours, and a stop at focusnavigationhub similarly rewarded reflective time, content that benefits from sitting with rather than racing past is the kind I want more of and the kind that this site appears to consistently produce week after week here.
Felt the writer was speaking my language without trying to imitate it, and a look at claritychanneling continued that natural fit, when a writers default voice happens to match what you find easy to read the experience feels frictionless and that is something I notice and remember about specific sites going forward.
Felt the writer was speaking my language without trying to imitate it, and a look at signalturnsaction continued that natural fit, when a writers default voice happens to match what you find easy to read the experience feels frictionless and that is something I notice and remember about specific sites going forward.
Learned something from this without having to dig through layers of fluff, and a stop at unitedbusinessbond added a bit more context that helped tie things together for me, definitely a useful corner of the internet for anyone who wants real information without the usual marketing nonsense around it that often ruins similar pages.
A welcome reminder that thoughtful writing still happens online, and a look at strategicflow extended that reassurance, the modern web makes it easy to forget that careful writing exists and finding sites that practice it is a small antidote to the cynicism that builds up from too much exposure to algorithmic content.
One of the more honest takes on the topic I have seen lately, no spin and no oversell, and a stop at ideaflowengine kept that going, the kind of voice the open web could use a lot more of rather than the endless echo chamber of recycled opinions floating around every social platform these days.
This actually answered the question I had been searching for, and after I checked directionshapesprogress I had a few more pieces I had not realised I needed, that is the sign of a site that knows what its readers want before they even know how to ask it which is impressive.
Bookmark earned and shared the link with one specific person who would care, and a look at professionaltrustgroup got the same targeted share, sharing carefully rather than broadcasting is a discipline I try to maintain and this site is generating shares from me at a sustainable rate rather than the spam rate of viral content.
Speaking from the perspective of having read widely on the topic this site offers something distinct, and a look at clarityinitiator reinforced that distinctness, the rare site that contributes something genuinely original to a saturated topic is the rare site worth following carefully and this one has demonstrated that original contribution capability today.
Skimmed first and then went back to read carefully, and the careful read paid off in places I had missed, and a stop at covenantpartners got the same treatment, the rare site whose content rewards a second pass is content I want more of in my regular rotation rather than disposable single read articles.
Probably worth setting aside a longer block to read more carefully than I can right now, and a stop at bondedfuture confirmed the longer block plan, the impulse to schedule dedicated time for a sites archive is itself a measure of trust and this site has earned that scheduling impulse from me clearly today actually.
Found a couple of useful angles in here I had not considered before reading carefully, and a quick stop at unitedgrowthcircle added more, this is one of those sites where the value compounds the more you read rather than peaking at one viral post and then offering nothing else of substance afterwards which is common.
A piece that suggested careful editing without showing the marks of the editing, and a look at bondedprosperity continued that invisible polish, the best editing disappears into the prose and this site reads as having been edited with skill that does not announce itself which is the highest compliment I can offer any blog content.
Solid post, the structure is easy to follow and the language stays simple even when the topic gets a bit more involved, and a look at forwardmotionlogic kept that same standard going, so I left feeling like the time spent here was actually worth something for once which is rare lately.
Reading this in the time it took to drink half a cup of coffee, and a stop at signalcreatesalignment fit naturally into the second half, content that respects the rhythms of a typical morning is content with practical fit and this site has the kind of length and pacing that works for the way I actually read.
Found the writing surprisingly fresh for what is by now a well covered topic, and a stop at ideasbecomeforward kept that freshness going across the related pages, original perspective on familiar ground is hard to come by and this site has clearly earned its place in the conversation rather than just rehashing old ideas.
Skipped to a specific section because I knew that was the question I had, and the answer was clean, and a stop at clarityleadsforward similarly delivered targeted answers without burying them, content engineered for readers who arrive with specific needs rather than open ended browsing is increasingly valuable in a search heavy reading environment.
Top tier post, the kind that makes you want to share the link with friends working in the same area, and a stop at ideastomotion only made me more confident in doing that, this site is one of the better resources I have seen on the topic recently across both new and older posts.
A piece that reads like it was written for me without claiming to be written for me, and a look at focusnavigation produced the same fit, when the writer audience match clicks naturally without being engineered through demographic targeting you know the writing is solid and this site has that natural fit consistently for me.