El próximo vuelo del Discovery y la Astrofísica Espacial
Miguel Mas Hesse
LAEFF-CSIC
Dentro de unas semanas será lanzado de nuevo el «Space Shuttle» Discovery, de la NASA, camino de la Estación Espacial Internacional (ISS). El éxito de este vuelo es fundamental para la investigación espacial en general, ya que los vuelos del Shuttle son necesarios para completar la ISS. Pero el éxito es también imprescindible para el futuro de la Astrofísica Espacial, ya que de él depende el que el Telescopio Espacial Hubble (HST) pueda seguir operativo unos años más.
¿Cómo es posible que nos encontremos en una situación en que tanto el futuro de la ISS como el del HST dependan del lanzamiento de un Space Shuttle, algo que considerábamos trivial hasta hace poco tiempo? Hagamos un poco de historia. El acceso del Hombre al Espacio se materializó en los años 60 del siglo pasado por medio de pequeñas cápsulas presurizadas que eran impulsadas por potentes cohetes. Estas cápsulas eran muy pequeñas, y en los primeros tiempos tan sólo dejaban espacio para 1 o 2 astronautas sentados, que tenían que permanecer en esa posición durante el desarrollo de la misión. Por el lado americano este concepto llegó a su punto culminante con la combinación de las cápsulas Apollo, que incluían un módulo de servicio más amplio, y los lanzadores Saturno V, fruto del ingenio del hoy ya mítico Wernher von Braun. El Saturno V es el cohete más potente y más fiable (ningún fallo) que ha fabricado el Hombre, más potente incluso que los «Space Shuttle» modernos.
El Apollo 13 en su plataforma de lanzamiento
Pero el coste de cada lanzamiento era prohibitivo. Por este motivo, a comienzos de los años 70 NASA decidió desarrollar un sistema de lanzaderas espaciales que fueran potentes, versátiles, y mucho más baratas. El concepto básica fue la capacidad de reutilización, con el objetivo de reducir costes. En el Shuttle se aprovechan casi todos los elementos, excepto el tanque exterior de combustible. Tanto la nave como los motores principales regresan a Tierra y pueden volar múltiples veces. Sin embargo, lo que parecía una buena idea no resultó tan buena después de todo. Para que un Shuttle vuelva a volar repetidamente a lo largo de los años en condiciones de seguridad hacen falta revisiones y mejoras tan profundas que el coste de cada misión sigue siendo muy elevado.
Lanzamiento de la misión Discovery STS141
Los soviéticos optaron por un concepto más clásico: siguieron desarrollando sus cápsulas tipo Soyuz, que son lanzadas por cohetes fabricados en serie a un coste relativamente bajo. En los años 80 intentaron copiar el diseño de los Shuttle americanos, pero su nave Buran acoplada a un cohete Energya sólo realizó un vuelo de prueba. La crisis de la URSS impidió el desarrollo del sistema, pese a sus ventajas.
Los Shuttle americanos han realizado ya numerosas misiones con éxito. Pero desgraciadamente adolecen de defectos de diseño que los hacen más vulnerables de lo que sería aceptable. No olvidemos que el diseño básico es de los años 70 del pasado siglo. El primer defecto grave afectó a los motores de combustible sólido: un error de diseño en unas simples juntas de caucho provocaron que el Challenger estallara durante el lanzamiento en enero de 1986. A pesar de la gravedad del accidente, el defecto era relativamente simple y fue corregido rápidamente. Pero hay otro problema de diseño mucho más serio: el Shuttle despega acoplado al gigantesco depósito de hidrógeno y oxígenos líquidos, que sobresale claramente por encima de la nave. Este depósito se encuentra a temperaturas criogénicas por lo que, a pesar de los aislantes, se forma hielo en su superficie cuando se encuentra en la rampa de lanzamiento. Al encender los motores, gruesos bloques de hielo se desprenden y golpean contra la estructura del Shuttle, produciendo daños en el aislamiento térmico. Este problema ha ocurrido desde los primeros días del Shuttle, y siempre se consideró normal que algunas losetas térmicas se desprendieran. Pero en el último lanzamiento del Columbia, en 2003, un bloque de hielo dañó el borde de ataque de una de las alas. En la reentrada, el gas a altas temperaturas penetró por allí y llevó a la destrucción completa de la nave. Este problema podría haber sucedido, de hecho, en cualquier otro vuelo anterior.
Astronautas realizando operaciones de mantenimiento en el HST en 1997
NASA reaccionó rediseñando el tanque de combustible. Durante el último vuelo del Discovery el pasado otoño se probó el nuevo diseño, pero para desesperación de los ingenieros de NASA, gruesos bloques de hielo volvieron a caer sobre el Shuttle, forzando una reparación en órbita de los paneles dañados. Dentro de unas semanas se procederá a una nueva prueba con el Discovery. En esta ocasión los ingenieros esperan que los problemas se hayan solucionado.
No sólo los ingenieros lo esperan. Mientras el problema no esté bajo control, NASA decidió que los Shuttle sólo volarían a la ISS, de manera que si se detecta algún daño los astronautas podrían refugiarse allí y retornar mediante una cápsula Soyuz que permanece permanentemente atracada. Esto implica que hoy por hoy NASA no autoriza que el Shuttle visite el HST, una visita necesaria para reemplazar los giróscopos e instalar nuevos instrumentos. Sin esta visita será difícil que el HST pueda continuar sus operaciones mucho más allá de 2008. De hecho, sin el empuje periódico del Shuttle, el HST acabará cayendo al océano de manera descontrolada en un plazo relativamente corto.
El Shuttle Discovery atracado en la ISS durante su último vuelo
Esperemos por lo tanto que NASA vuelva a poner en operación su flota de Shuttles, que sean capaces de terminar la construcción de la ISS, y que puedan volver a dejar el HST en condiciones óptimas de funcionamiento dentro de un par de años.
Decided this was the best thing I had read all morning, and a stop at plasmaredshift kept that ranking intact, ranking my reading is something I do mentally throughout the day and the top rank is competitive and not easily won but this site won it without needing to overstate its claims for that.
Felt this in a way I cannot quite explain, the topic just hit different here, and a stop at vaporsalt continued in that vein, sometimes you find a site whose perspective lines up with how you have been thinking and reading their work feels like a small relief which I appreciated more than I expected.
Coming back to this one, definitely, and a quick visit to soucia only made me more sure of that, the kind of writing that makes you want to set aside time later rather than rushing through it now while distracted by everything else competing for attention on the screen today across so many tabs.
Even just sampling a few posts the consistency is what stands out, and a look at tinews confirmed the broader pattern, sites where every piece I sample lives up to the standard set by the others are sites with serious quality control and this one has clearly invested in whatever editorial process produces that consistency reliably.
Well done, the kind of post that makes you slow down and actually read instead of skimming for keywords, and a look at herbertjones kept me reading carefully too, that is a sign of writing that has been crafted rather than churned out for an algorithm to see today and tomorrow.
A piece that handled multiple complications without becoming confused, and a look at holychords continued that organisational clarity, holding multiple threads in a single piece without losing any of them is a sign of skilled writing and this site has clearly developed the editorial discipline to manage complexity without sacrificing readability throughout.
Reading this gave me the rare experience of fully agreeing with all the conclusions, and a stop at jamesduncan continued that agreement pattern, content that aligns with my existing views without seeming designed to do so is just content that happens to be reasonable and this site reads as reasonable rather than ideological mostly.
Useful enough to recommend to several people I know who would appreciate it, and a stop at poetpopulist added more material I will pass along too, the kind of writing that earns word of mouth is the kind that actually delivers on its promises which is what this site does without any drama or fanfare attached.
Closed it feeling slightly more competent in the topic than I started, and a stop at crackpatch reinforced that competence boost, real learning is rare in casual online reading but it does happen sometimes and this site managed to make it happen for me today which is genuinely worth pausing to acknowledge.
Genuinely changed how I think about a small piece of the topic, which does not happen often online, and a look at robertbriggs added another nudge in the same direction, the kind of writing that earns a small mental shift rather than just confirming what you already thought before reading is a sign of careful thought.
Reading this slowly to give it the attention it deserved, and a stop at gladiatorsforum earned the same slow read, choosing to read slowly is a small act of respect for content quality and very few sites earn that respect from me but this one did so without any explicit ask which is the cleanest way.
Now placing this in the small category of sites whose updates I would actually want to know about, and a stop at corypeterson confirmed that placement, the difference between sites I want to follow and sites I just consume from is real and this one has crossed into the active follow category from the casual consumption side.
Solid information that lines up with what I have been hearing from other reliable sources, and after my visit to zephyrpearl I was even more certain of that, this site checks out which is something I value highly when so many places online play loose with the facts to chase a quick click.
A small thank you note from me to the team behind this work, the post earned it, and a stop at meledak77mantap suggested more thanks would be in order over time, recognising the people who do good writing online is something I try to remember to do because the alternative is silence and silence rewards mediocrity unfortunately.
Just one of those reads that left me feeling slightly more capable rather than overwhelmed, and a look at appfountain kept that empowering feel going, the difference between content that builds the reader up and content that intimidates them is huge and this site clearly knows which side of that line to stand.
A piece that read as the work of someone who reads carefully themselves, and a look at magisteriuma continued that informed feel, writers who are also serious readers produce work with a different quality and this site reads as the product of someone steeped in good writing rather than just generating content for an audience.
Thanks for a post that does not try to be funny when it is not the moment for it, and a stop at blipsa maintained the same appropriate seriousness, knowing when humour helps and when it just signals desperation for engagement is a sign of editorial maturity that many blogs have not developed yet.
Now considering whether the post would translate well into a different form, and a look at mariahill suggested similar versatility, content that could move into other media without losing its substance is content that has been built around ideas rather than around format and this site reads as idea first throughout posts.
Took a few notes from this post, the points are easy to remember without needing to come back and check, and a look at joshuablackwellmd added a couple more, the kind of place that sticks in the memory long after the browser tab has been closed for the day which says a lot really.
The whole experience of reading this was pleasant from start to finish, no pop ups and no annoying interruptions, and a look at haulera continued that clean experience, technical choices about page design matter for the reader and this site clearly cares about the small details that add up to comfort across multiple visits.
Beats most of the alternatives on the topic by a noticeable margin, and a look at a-nz49 did not change that at all, this is one of the better corners of the open internet for this kind of content and I am glad I clicked through rather than skipping past quickly like I usually do.
Quietly enthusiastic about this site after the past few hours of reading, and a stop at sandaltrust extended that enthusiasm, the calibration of enthusiasm to evidence is something I try to maintain and this site has earned a calibrated quiet enthusiasm rather than the loud excitement that usually fades within a day or two of finding something.
Pass this along to anyone you know dealing with similar questions, the answers here are clear, and a stop at debrabowen adds even more useful material, this is the kind of resource that deserves to circulate widely rather than getting lost in the constant churn of new content online that buries good work daily.
Took the time to read the comments on this post too and they were also worth reading, and a stop at chousea suggested the community quality matches the content quality, when the conversation around a piece is as good as the piece itself you know you have found a real corner of the internet.
A piece that read as if the writer was thinking carefully rather than just typing fluently, and a look at crackfine continued that considered quality, the difference between fluent typing and careful thinking shows up in writing and this site reads as the product of thought rather than just the product of language fluency apparently.
Genuinely useful read, the points are practical and easy to apply right away, and a quick look at haircover confirmed that this site is consistent in that approach, looking forward to digging through the rest of it when I get the chance to sit down properly later in the week or this weekend.
Honestly thank you to whoever wrote this because it scratched an itch I had not quite been able to articulate, and a stop at zonalzone kept that satisfying feeling going, the kind of writing that meets unspoken needs is special and this site clearly has writers who understand their readers more than most do today.
Definitely returning here, that is decided, and a look at pomswap only made the case stronger, this is one of those rare websites that rewards regular visits rather than feeling stale after the first read which is something I cannot say about most of the places I bookmark today across all my topics.
Clean writing, easy to read, and never tries too hard to impress, that combination is harder to find than people think, and after my time on squaresloop I am sure this site treats its readers well, no flashy tricks just useful content done right which is honestly all I want online.
After several visits I am now confident this site is one to follow seriously, and a stop at coloradocrew reinforced that confidence, the gradual building of trust through repeated quality exposures is the only sustainable way to develop reader loyalty and this site is building that loyalty in me through patient consistent work consistently.
Generally I do not leave comments but this post merits a small note, and a stop at seattlebeaches extended that comment worthy quality, the urge to actively contribute to a sites community rather than passively consume from it is something specific content provokes and this site has provoked that engagement urge from me today.
Anyone curious about this topic would do well to start here, the foundation laid is solid, and a stop at percentsa would round out their understanding nicely, this is the kind of resource I would point a friend toward without hesitation if they asked me where to begin learning about anything in this area.
Thanks for a post that does not try to be funny when it is not the moment for it, and a stop at pivotengine maintained the same appropriate seriousness, knowing when humour helps and when it just signals desperation for engagement is a sign of editorial maturity that many blogs have not developed yet.
Bookmark earned, share earned, return visit earned, all from one reading session, and a look at juliabarker did the same, the trifecta of bookmark and share and return is rare in a single visit and represents the highest level of engagement I tend to offer any piece of online content these days here.
Following a few of the internal links revealed more posts of similar quality, and a stop at apporchard added more to that growing pile, sites where internal links lead to more good content rather than to more of the same recycled material are sites with depth and this one has clearly built that depth carefully.
Honestly informative, the writer covers the ground without showing off, and a look at meghanlawson reflected the same humility, content that respects the reader rather than trying to dazzle them is something I always appreciate and rarely come across in this corner of the internet today across the topics I usually read.
Felt energised after reading rather than drained, which is unusual for online content these days, and a look at a-nz31 continued that good feeling, content that leaves you better than it found you is rare and worth bookmarking when you stumble across it for the first time today or any other day really.
Taking the time to read carefully here has been worthwhile for the past hour, and a look at a-nz48 extended the worthwhile reading, the calculation of return on reading time spent is something I do informally and this site has been producing positive returns across multiple sessions during the last week of regular visits and reads.
Now feeling confident that this site will continue producing work I will want to read, and a look at dylbray extended that confidence into the future, projecting forward from current quality to expected future quality is something I do for sites I genuinely follow and this one has earned that forward looking trust clearly today.
Reading this slowly to give it the attention it deserved, and a stop at zoneengine earned the same slow read, choosing to read slowly is a small act of respect for content quality and very few sites earn that respect from me but this one did so without any explicit ask which is the cleanest way.
Found the post genuinely useful for something I was working on this week, and a look at convertersa added more material I will reference, content that connects to my actual life and work rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind I will pay attention to and return to repeatedly.
This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at tonybarnes kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.
Ended up here on a wandering afternoon and was glad I stayed for the read, and a stop at riseflow extended the wandering into a proper exploration of the site, the kind of place that rewards aimless clicking with something genuinely interesting rather than the shallow content that mostly populates the modern open web.
Solid stuff, the kind of post that I will probably refer back to later this month when the topic comes up again, and a look at zonalzeny only confirmed I should bookmark the site as a whole rather than just this single page for future reference and use across coming weeks.
Reading this fit naturally into my afternoon walk because I was reading on my phone, and a stop at vipsportsclub continued well in that walking format, content that survives mobile reading without becoming awkward is content with format flexibility and this site has clearly thought about how it reads across different devices today.
Bookmark folder created specifically for this site, and a look at breezelink confirmed the dedicated folder was the right call, dedicated folders for individual sites are a level of organisation I rarely deploy and this site has earned that level of dedicated tracking based on the consistency I have seen so far across sessions.
Reading this brought back an idea I had set aside months ago, and a stop at devdepot added more substance to that idea, content that revives dormant projects in my own thinking is content with serious creative value and this site is contributing to my own work in ways I had not expected when first clicking through.
Felt the writer did the homework before publishing, the references hold up, and a look at tatersa continued that documented care, content with traceable claims rather than vague assertions is the kind I trust and the lack of bald assertion in this post is one of its quietly impressive qualities for me.
Beyond the topic at hand this site reads as a small ongoing project of taking writing seriously, and a look at samuelstafford reinforced that project quality, sites that treat publishing as an ongoing serious practice rather than as content production for traffic are sites worth supporting and this one has clearly chosen the serious approach.