El próximo vuelo del Discovery y la Astrofísica Espacial
Miguel Mas Hesse
LAEFF-CSIC
Dentro de unas semanas será lanzado de nuevo el «Space Shuttle» Discovery, de la NASA, camino de la Estación Espacial Internacional (ISS). El éxito de este vuelo es fundamental para la investigación espacial en general, ya que los vuelos del Shuttle son necesarios para completar la ISS. Pero el éxito es también imprescindible para el futuro de la Astrofísica Espacial, ya que de él depende el que el Telescopio Espacial Hubble (HST) pueda seguir operativo unos años más.
¿Cómo es posible que nos encontremos en una situación en que tanto el futuro de la ISS como el del HST dependan del lanzamiento de un Space Shuttle, algo que considerábamos trivial hasta hace poco tiempo? Hagamos un poco de historia. El acceso del Hombre al Espacio se materializó en los años 60 del siglo pasado por medio de pequeñas cápsulas presurizadas que eran impulsadas por potentes cohetes. Estas cápsulas eran muy pequeñas, y en los primeros tiempos tan sólo dejaban espacio para 1 o 2 astronautas sentados, que tenían que permanecer en esa posición durante el desarrollo de la misión. Por el lado americano este concepto llegó a su punto culminante con la combinación de las cápsulas Apollo, que incluían un módulo de servicio más amplio, y los lanzadores Saturno V, fruto del ingenio del hoy ya mítico Wernher von Braun. El Saturno V es el cohete más potente y más fiable (ningún fallo) que ha fabricado el Hombre, más potente incluso que los «Space Shuttle» modernos.
El Apollo 13 en su plataforma de lanzamiento
Pero el coste de cada lanzamiento era prohibitivo. Por este motivo, a comienzos de los años 70 NASA decidió desarrollar un sistema de lanzaderas espaciales que fueran potentes, versátiles, y mucho más baratas. El concepto básica fue la capacidad de reutilización, con el objetivo de reducir costes. En el Shuttle se aprovechan casi todos los elementos, excepto el tanque exterior de combustible. Tanto la nave como los motores principales regresan a Tierra y pueden volar múltiples veces. Sin embargo, lo que parecía una buena idea no resultó tan buena después de todo. Para que un Shuttle vuelva a volar repetidamente a lo largo de los años en condiciones de seguridad hacen falta revisiones y mejoras tan profundas que el coste de cada misión sigue siendo muy elevado.
Lanzamiento de la misión Discovery STS141
Los soviéticos optaron por un concepto más clásico: siguieron desarrollando sus cápsulas tipo Soyuz, que son lanzadas por cohetes fabricados en serie a un coste relativamente bajo. En los años 80 intentaron copiar el diseño de los Shuttle americanos, pero su nave Buran acoplada a un cohete Energya sólo realizó un vuelo de prueba. La crisis de la URSS impidió el desarrollo del sistema, pese a sus ventajas.
Los Shuttle americanos han realizado ya numerosas misiones con éxito. Pero desgraciadamente adolecen de defectos de diseño que los hacen más vulnerables de lo que sería aceptable. No olvidemos que el diseño básico es de los años 70 del pasado siglo. El primer defecto grave afectó a los motores de combustible sólido: un error de diseño en unas simples juntas de caucho provocaron que el Challenger estallara durante el lanzamiento en enero de 1986. A pesar de la gravedad del accidente, el defecto era relativamente simple y fue corregido rápidamente. Pero hay otro problema de diseño mucho más serio: el Shuttle despega acoplado al gigantesco depósito de hidrógeno y oxígenos líquidos, que sobresale claramente por encima de la nave. Este depósito se encuentra a temperaturas criogénicas por lo que, a pesar de los aislantes, se forma hielo en su superficie cuando se encuentra en la rampa de lanzamiento. Al encender los motores, gruesos bloques de hielo se desprenden y golpean contra la estructura del Shuttle, produciendo daños en el aislamiento térmico. Este problema ha ocurrido desde los primeros días del Shuttle, y siempre se consideró normal que algunas losetas térmicas se desprendieran. Pero en el último lanzamiento del Columbia, en 2003, un bloque de hielo dañó el borde de ataque de una de las alas. En la reentrada, el gas a altas temperaturas penetró por allí y llevó a la destrucción completa de la nave. Este problema podría haber sucedido, de hecho, en cualquier otro vuelo anterior.
Astronautas realizando operaciones de mantenimiento en el HST en 1997
NASA reaccionó rediseñando el tanque de combustible. Durante el último vuelo del Discovery el pasado otoño se probó el nuevo diseño, pero para desesperación de los ingenieros de NASA, gruesos bloques de hielo volvieron a caer sobre el Shuttle, forzando una reparación en órbita de los paneles dañados. Dentro de unas semanas se procederá a una nueva prueba con el Discovery. En esta ocasión los ingenieros esperan que los problemas se hayan solucionado.
No sólo los ingenieros lo esperan. Mientras el problema no esté bajo control, NASA decidió que los Shuttle sólo volarían a la ISS, de manera que si se detecta algún daño los astronautas podrían refugiarse allí y retornar mediante una cápsula Soyuz que permanece permanentemente atracada. Esto implica que hoy por hoy NASA no autoriza que el Shuttle visite el HST, una visita necesaria para reemplazar los giróscopos e instalar nuevos instrumentos. Sin esta visita será difícil que el HST pueda continuar sus operaciones mucho más allá de 2008. De hecho, sin el empuje periódico del Shuttle, el HST acabará cayendo al océano de manera descontrolada en un plazo relativamente corto.
El Shuttle Discovery atracado en la ISS durante su último vuelo
Esperemos por lo tanto que NASA vuelva a poner en operación su flota de Shuttles, que sean capaces de terminar la construcción de la ISS, y que puedan volver a dejar el HST en condiciones óptimas de funcionamiento dentro de un par de años.
Bookmark added without hesitation after finishing, and a look at professionalbondnetwork confirmed I should bookmark the homepage too rather than just this page, the rare site that earns category level trust rather than just single article approval is the kind I want to rely on across many different topics over time.
Genuinely well crafted writing, the kind that makes the topic look easier than it actually is, and a look at visionprogression added even more depth, you can feel the experience behind every line which is something only writers who have been at this for a while can pull off with this level of grace.
Took something from this I did not expect to find, and a stop at elitepartnershipnetwork added another unexpected useful piece, content that exceeds expectations rather than just meeting them is the kind that builds enthusiasm and earns repeat visits without any explicit ask from the writer or platform behind the work being read.
Now placing this in the small category of sites whose updates I would actually want to know about, and a stop at strategicgrowthbond confirmed that placement, the difference between sites I want to follow and sites I just consume from is real and this one has crossed into the active follow category from the casual consumption side.
I really like how the writer keeps the tone friendly without sounding fake or overly polished, and after a stop at focusfeedsmomentum the same calm pace was there, no rushing to make a point and no padding either, just clean honest writing that I can respect and come back to later again.
Now considering writing a longer note about the post somewhere, and a look at focusdefinesmomentum added more material for that note, content that prompts me to write rather than just consume is content with generative energy and this site is producing that generative effect for me at a higher rate than most sources.
Honest reaction is that I want to send this to a friend who would benefit from it, and a look at signalunlocksprogress added more material I will pass along too, the impulse to share is the strongest signal I have for content quality and this site is generating that impulse cleanly across multiple posts.
Really appreciate the absence of stock photos that have nothing to do with the content, and a quick visit to clarityactivator maintained the same restraint, visual filler is a tell that the writing cannot stand on its own and the lack of it here suggests the team has confidence in their content quality alone.
Just enjoyed the experience without needing to think about why, and a look at focusactivation kept that effortless feeling going, sometimes the best content is invisible in the sense that you forget you are reading until you reach the end and realise time has passed without you noticing it pass naturally.
Strong recommendation, anyone interested in this topic owes themselves a visit, and a stop at claritymovement extends that recommendation across more of the site, this is the kind of resource that makes me more optimistic about the state of the open web than I usually am these days actually for once which is genuinely refreshing.
Honest opinion is that this is the kind of post that builds long term trust with readers, and a look at claritystrategy reinforced that perception, the slow accumulation of trust through consistent quality is the only sustainable way to build a real audience and this site is clearly playing that long game.
Worth flagging this site to a few specific friends who would appreciate the editorial sensibility, and a look at unitedcapitalbond added more pages I will mention to them, recommending sites to specific people requires understanding both the site and the person and this site is making those personalised recommendations easy and natural for me.
Adding this site to my regular reading list, the post earned that on its own, and a quick stop at actiondrivesdirection sealed the decision, the kind of place worth checking back with from time to time because it consistently produces material that holds up against a critical reading too which I really value.
Found something new in here that I had not seen explained this way before, and a quick stop at globaltrustalliance expanded the idea even further, the kind of writing that nudges your thinking forward a bit without forcing the issue is exactly what I look for online today and rarely actually find anywhere.
Bookmarking this for later, the kind of resource I want to keep nearby, and a quick look at signalpowersgrowth confirmed the rest of the site is worth the same treatment, definitely going into my reference folder for the next time the topic comes up at work or in conversation with someone who asks.
Worth pointing out that the writing reads as confident without being defensive about it, and a look at growthflowswithsignal extended that secure tone, content that does not pre emptively argue against imagined critics has a different quality from defensive writing and this site reads as written from a place of real ease.
Well crafted post, the structure flows naturally from one point to the next without forcing transitions, and a stop at progressactivator kept the same flow going, you can tell when a writer has thought about how their content reads rather than just what it contains and this is one of those examples.
More substantial than most of what I find searching for this topic online, and a stop at claritynavigator kept that quality consistent, this is one of those sites where the writing actually rewards careful reading rather than punishing the patient reader with empty filler stretched out across long paragraphs that say very little.
Did not expect much when I clicked through but ended up reading the whole thing carefully, and a stop at actioncreatesvelocity kept that engagement going, sometimes the unassuming sites turn out to deliver more than the flashy ones which is something I have learned to look out for over time online lately and across topics.
Came away with some new perspectives I had not considered before, and after securepathbond those ideas felt more complete, the kind of content that stays with you a little while after reading rather than slipping out the moment you switch tabs and move on with your day to whatever comes next.
Appreciate the work that went into laying this out so clearly, every section earns its place without filler, and a look at directionalstructure confirmed the same care, definitely the kind of place that deserves a return visit when the topic comes up again later in the future or for any related question.
Liked the balance between depth and brevity, never too shallow and never too long, and a stop at strategicpartnergroup kept the same balance going across the rest of the site, this is one of the harder skills in writing and the team here clearly has it figured out very well indeed across every page.
Just one of those reads that left me feeling slightly more capable rather than overwhelmed, and a look at forwardenergyactivated kept that empowering feel going, the difference between content that builds the reader up and content that intimidates them is huge and this site clearly knows which side of that line to stand.
Thank you for keeping the writing honest and the points easy to verify against your own experience, and a stop at globalcollaborationhub reflected the same approach, no exaggeration just steady useful content that I can take with me into my own work without second guessing every sentence I happen to read here.
A piece that handled a controversial angle without becoming heated, and a look at trustedlineage continued that calm engagement, content that can address contested topics without inflaming them is doing rare diplomatic work and this site has clearly developed the editorial maturity to handle sensitive material with the appropriate temperature of writing throughout.
Now thinking about how this post will age over the coming years, and a stop at signalfeedsaction suggested the same durability, content built to age well rather than to capture the attention of the moment is content with a different kind of value and this site has clearly chosen the long horizon over the short one.
A piece that read as the work of someone who reads carefully themselves, and a look at growthpathway continued that informed feel, writers who are also serious readers produce work with a different quality and this site reads as the product of someone steeped in good writing rather than just generating content for an audience.
Bookmark added without hesitation after finishing, and a look at ideaprocessing confirmed I should bookmark the homepage too rather than just this page, the rare site that earns category level trust rather than just single article approval is the kind I want to rely on across many different topics over time.
Glad I stumbled across this post, the explanations actually make sense without needing background knowledge to follow along, and after a stop at directionamplifiesmotion the same was true there, no assumptions about the reader just clear writing that anyone can understand from the first line right through to the end.
Reading this brought back an idea I had set aside months ago, and a stop at bondedhorizons added more substance to that idea, content that revives dormant projects in my own thinking is content with serious creative value and this site is contributing to my own work in ways I had not expected when first clicking through.
Stayed longer than planned because each section earned the next, and a look at strategyalignmenthub kept that pulling effect going across more pages, the kind of subtle pull that good writing exerts on attention is something I find harder and harder to resist when I encounter it on the open web today.
Probably worth setting aside a longer block to read more carefully than I can right now, and a stop at growthmovesintentionally confirmed the longer block plan, the impulse to schedule dedicated time for a sites archive is itself a measure of trust and this site has earned that scheduling impulse from me clearly today actually.
Worth pointing out that the post avoided the temptation to summarise everything at the end, and a look at clarityguidesmovement continued that confident closing approach, content that trusts readers to retain the substance without being reminded of it at the end is content that respects the reader and this site practices that respect.
Spent a few minutes here and came away with a clearer picture of the topic, the writing keeps things simple without dumbing them down, and after a stop at forwardmovementlab the rest of the points lined up neatly which is something I appreciate when I am short on time and need answers fast.
During my morning reading slot this fit perfectly into the routine, and a look at actionstarter extended that perfect fit into the rest of the routine, content that matches the rhythm of how I actually read rather than demanding accommodation from my schedule is content well calibrated to its likely audience and this site has it.
Reading this gave me a small sense of progress on a topic I have been slowly working through, and a stop at actiondrivenmovement added another step forward, learning happens in small increments across many sources and finding sources that consistently contribute is the actual practical value of careful curation in an information rich world.
Following the post through to the end without my attention drifting once, and a look at focustrajectory earned the same uninterrupted attention, content that holds attention without manipulating it is content with substantive pull and this site has demonstrated that substantive pull across multiple pieces in a single reading session reliably here today.
Bookmark added with a small mental note that this is a site to keep, and a look at actionguidance reinforced the keep status, the verb keep rather than visit captures something about how I think about this kind of site and it is a higher tier of relationship than I have with most places online today.
Started taking notes about halfway through because the points were stacking up, and a look at solidaritynetwork added enough material that my notes file grew further, content that demands note taking from a passive reader is content with substance and the writers here are clearly producing that kind of work consistently across topics.
A piece that did not lean on the writer credentials or institutional backing, and a look at progressmovesstrategicallynow maintained the same focus on substance, content that earns trust through quality rather than through name dropping is the kind I find most persuasive and this site is clearly playing on the substance side of that distinction.
Picked something concrete from the post that I will use immediately, and a look at visionactivation added another concrete piece, content that produces immediately useful output rather than just abstract appreciation is content that earns its place in my regular rotation without needing any further evaluation from me at this point honestly.
Beats most of the alternatives on the topic by a noticeable margin, and a look at progressflowsstrategically did not change that at all, this is one of the better corners of the open internet for this kind of content and I am glad I clicked through rather than skipping past quickly like I usually do.
Came away with a slightly better mental model of the topic than I started with, and a stop at actionfuelsprogress sharpened that further, content that improves the reader thinking apparatus rather than just dumping facts into it is the rare kind I genuinely value and seek out when I have time to read carefully.
Pass this along to colleagues if the topic comes up, the framing here is sensible, and a stop at successbondcollective adds more useful angles to share, the kind of content that improves conversations rather than just feeding them is what makes a resource genuinely valuable in professional contexts going forward over time and across project boundaries too.
A piece that left me thinking I had been undercaring about the topic, and a look at futurefocusedbond reinforced that mild concern, content that raises the appropriate weight of a subject without being preachy about it is doing important work and this site is providing that gentle elevation of attention for me consistently.
Reading this confirmed something I had been suspecting about the topic, and a look at secureunitybond pushed that confirmation toward greater confidence, content that lines up with independently held intuitions earns a special kind of trust and I will return to writers who consistently land that way for me without overselling positions.
Skipped lunch to finish reading, which says something, and a stop at directionalclarity kept me at my desk longer than planned, when content beats the lunch impulse the writer has done something genuinely impressive in an attention environment full of immediately satisfying alternatives competing for the same finite block of reader time.
Took a screenshot of one section to come back to later, and a stop at directionaldrive prompted another saved tab, the urge to capture and revisit specific pieces of content is something I rarely feel but when I do it tells me the work is worth more than the average passing read for sure.
Genuine pleasure to read, and that is not something I say often after a casual click through, and a quick visit to globalunitybond kept the same feeling going across the rest of the site, finding writing that actually feels good to spend time with rather than just functional is increasingly rare on the open web.
Closed the laptop after this and let the ideas settle for a few hours, and a stop at directionchannelsenergy similarly rewarded reflective time, content that benefits from sitting with rather than racing past is the kind I want more of and the kind that this site appears to consistently produce week after week here.