El próximo vuelo del Discovery y la Astrofísica Espacial
Miguel Mas Hesse
LAEFF-CSIC
Dentro de unas semanas será lanzado de nuevo el «Space Shuttle» Discovery, de la NASA, camino de la Estación Espacial Internacional (ISS). El éxito de este vuelo es fundamental para la investigación espacial en general, ya que los vuelos del Shuttle son necesarios para completar la ISS. Pero el éxito es también imprescindible para el futuro de la Astrofísica Espacial, ya que de él depende el que el Telescopio Espacial Hubble (HST) pueda seguir operativo unos años más.
¿Cómo es posible que nos encontremos en una situación en que tanto el futuro de la ISS como el del HST dependan del lanzamiento de un Space Shuttle, algo que considerábamos trivial hasta hace poco tiempo? Hagamos un poco de historia. El acceso del Hombre al Espacio se materializó en los años 60 del siglo pasado por medio de pequeñas cápsulas presurizadas que eran impulsadas por potentes cohetes. Estas cápsulas eran muy pequeñas, y en los primeros tiempos tan sólo dejaban espacio para 1 o 2 astronautas sentados, que tenían que permanecer en esa posición durante el desarrollo de la misión. Por el lado americano este concepto llegó a su punto culminante con la combinación de las cápsulas Apollo, que incluían un módulo de servicio más amplio, y los lanzadores Saturno V, fruto del ingenio del hoy ya mítico Wernher von Braun. El Saturno V es el cohete más potente y más fiable (ningún fallo) que ha fabricado el Hombre, más potente incluso que los «Space Shuttle» modernos.
El Apollo 13 en su plataforma de lanzamiento
Pero el coste de cada lanzamiento era prohibitivo. Por este motivo, a comienzos de los años 70 NASA decidió desarrollar un sistema de lanzaderas espaciales que fueran potentes, versátiles, y mucho más baratas. El concepto básica fue la capacidad de reutilización, con el objetivo de reducir costes. En el Shuttle se aprovechan casi todos los elementos, excepto el tanque exterior de combustible. Tanto la nave como los motores principales regresan a Tierra y pueden volar múltiples veces. Sin embargo, lo que parecía una buena idea no resultó tan buena después de todo. Para que un Shuttle vuelva a volar repetidamente a lo largo de los años en condiciones de seguridad hacen falta revisiones y mejoras tan profundas que el coste de cada misión sigue siendo muy elevado.
Lanzamiento de la misión Discovery STS141
Los soviéticos optaron por un concepto más clásico: siguieron desarrollando sus cápsulas tipo Soyuz, que son lanzadas por cohetes fabricados en serie a un coste relativamente bajo. En los años 80 intentaron copiar el diseño de los Shuttle americanos, pero su nave Buran acoplada a un cohete Energya sólo realizó un vuelo de prueba. La crisis de la URSS impidió el desarrollo del sistema, pese a sus ventajas.
Los Shuttle americanos han realizado ya numerosas misiones con éxito. Pero desgraciadamente adolecen de defectos de diseño que los hacen más vulnerables de lo que sería aceptable. No olvidemos que el diseño básico es de los años 70 del pasado siglo. El primer defecto grave afectó a los motores de combustible sólido: un error de diseño en unas simples juntas de caucho provocaron que el Challenger estallara durante el lanzamiento en enero de 1986. A pesar de la gravedad del accidente, el defecto era relativamente simple y fue corregido rápidamente. Pero hay otro problema de diseño mucho más serio: el Shuttle despega acoplado al gigantesco depósito de hidrógeno y oxígenos líquidos, que sobresale claramente por encima de la nave. Este depósito se encuentra a temperaturas criogénicas por lo que, a pesar de los aislantes, se forma hielo en su superficie cuando se encuentra en la rampa de lanzamiento. Al encender los motores, gruesos bloques de hielo se desprenden y golpean contra la estructura del Shuttle, produciendo daños en el aislamiento térmico. Este problema ha ocurrido desde los primeros días del Shuttle, y siempre se consideró normal que algunas losetas térmicas se desprendieran. Pero en el último lanzamiento del Columbia, en 2003, un bloque de hielo dañó el borde de ataque de una de las alas. En la reentrada, el gas a altas temperaturas penetró por allí y llevó a la destrucción completa de la nave. Este problema podría haber sucedido, de hecho, en cualquier otro vuelo anterior.
Astronautas realizando operaciones de mantenimiento en el HST en 1997
NASA reaccionó rediseñando el tanque de combustible. Durante el último vuelo del Discovery el pasado otoño se probó el nuevo diseño, pero para desesperación de los ingenieros de NASA, gruesos bloques de hielo volvieron a caer sobre el Shuttle, forzando una reparación en órbita de los paneles dañados. Dentro de unas semanas se procederá a una nueva prueba con el Discovery. En esta ocasión los ingenieros esperan que los problemas se hayan solucionado.
No sólo los ingenieros lo esperan. Mientras el problema no esté bajo control, NASA decidió que los Shuttle sólo volarían a la ISS, de manera que si se detecta algún daño los astronautas podrían refugiarse allí y retornar mediante una cápsula Soyuz que permanece permanentemente atracada. Esto implica que hoy por hoy NASA no autoriza que el Shuttle visite el HST, una visita necesaria para reemplazar los giróscopos e instalar nuevos instrumentos. Sin esta visita será difícil que el HST pueda continuar sus operaciones mucho más allá de 2008. De hecho, sin el empuje periódico del Shuttle, el HST acabará cayendo al océano de manera descontrolada en un plazo relativamente corto.
El Shuttle Discovery atracado en la ISS durante su último vuelo
Esperemos por lo tanto que NASA vuelva a poner en operación su flota de Shuttles, que sean capaces de terminar la construcción de la ISS, y que puedan volver a dejar el HST en condiciones óptimas de funcionamiento dentro de un par de años.
Just want to recognise that someone clearly cared about how this turned out, and a look at luisallen confirmed that care extends across the broader site, you can feel the difference between content shipped to hit a deadline and content released because the writer was actually proud of the result for once.
Appreciated that the writer trusted the reader to follow along without constant restating of earlier points, and a look at workkit continued that respect for the reader, treating an audience as capable adults rather than as people to be hand held through every paragraph is something I notice and value highly across the open internet today.
Now thinking about how to apply some of this to a project I have been planning, and a look at devfusion added more material for the planning, content that connects to my actual creative work rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind that earns priority placement in my reading rotation consistently going forward.
Skipped the comments section but might come back to read it, and a stop at edwardmyers hinted at a quality reader community, sites where the comments are worth reading separately from the post are increasingly rare and signal a particular kind of audience that has grown around the editorial vision over time gradually.
Started reading and ended an hour later without realising the time had passed, and a look at societynatural produced the same time dilation effect, when content makes time feel different the writer has achieved something well beyond the average and this site is producing that experience for me reliably across multiple readings.
Worth saying that the prose reads naturally without straining for style, and a stop at weretail maintained the same unforced quality, writing that achieves elegance without effort is the highest tier and this site has clearly worked out how to land that effortless quality consistently rather than only on the writers best days.
Felt the post had been quietly polished rather than aggressively styled, and a look at earthingshoes confirmed the same understated polish, sites whose quality reveals itself slowly rather than announcing itself loudly are the kind I trust more deeply because the trust is not based on first impressions of marketing but actual substance.
Reading this with a notebook open turned out to be the right move, and a stop at heliohost added more material to the notes, content that justifies active note taking from a passive reader is content with real informational density and this site is producing notes worthy material at a high rate consistently.
Top quality material, deserves more attention than it probably gets, and a look at heidiharrington reflected the same effort across the site, a hidden gem in the modern web where most attention goes to whoever shouts loudest rather than whoever actually delivers the best content for their readers without much marketing fanfare.
Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at eastwoodcenter continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.
Speaking carefully because I do not want to overstate things this site is genuinely above average across multiple measurements, and a stop at appalpha continued the above average performance, the calibration of judgement against potential overstatement is something I take seriously and this site clears the higher bar even after that calibration applies.
Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at puntersa continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.
Honestly the simplicity is what makes this work, the topic is not buried under filler words or overly complex examples, and a quick look at sagestack showed the same sensible style, I left with what I came for and no headache from over reading which is a real win these days.
Now considering carefully how to share this site with the right audience rather than broadcasting widely, and a look at eatworld extended that careful sharing impulse, content worth sharing carefully rather than spamming is content that has earned a higher kind of recommendation and this site has earned that careful shareability throughout pieces.
Found a small mental shift after reading this, the framing here is just a bit different from the standard takes online, and a look at robertbernard extended that fresh perspective across more material, the rare site whose voice actually changes how you think about something rather than just confirming existing beliefs.
Felt the writer did the homework before publishing, the references hold up, and a look at blog44exists continued that documented care, content with traceable claims rather than vague assertions is the kind I trust and the lack of bald assertion in this post is one of its quietly impressive qualities for me.
Now adjusting my mental model of how the topic fits into the broader landscape, and a look at grovegrid extended that adjustment, content that affects my structural understanding rather than just my factual knowledge is content with deeper impact and this site is providing those structural updates at a meaningful rate consistently across topics.
Worth recognising that the post did not pretend to be the final word on the topic, and a stop at zonecore continued that humility, content that admits its own scope and limits is more trustworthy than content that overreaches and this site has clearly developed the editorial maturity to know what it can and cannot claim well.
Reading more of the archives is now on my plan for the weekend, and a stop at sportsaving confirmed the archive worth the time, the rare archive worth a dedicated reading session rather than just casual sampling is the rare archive of serious work and this site has clearly produced enough of that work to warrant the deeper exploration.
Solid little post, the kind that does not need to be flashy because the substance is doing the work, and a look at a-nz33 kept that quiet confidence going across the site, this is what writing looks like when the writer trusts the content to land on its own without theatrics or unnecessary attention seeking behaviour.
The pacing of the post was just right, never rushed and never dragged out unnecessarily, and a look at forgeflow maintained the same rhythm, you can tell the writer has experience because the difficult skill of pacing is something only practiced writers manage to handle well in long form content over time and across formats.
Worth marking this site as one to come back to deliberately rather than by accident, and a stop at voidverse reinforced that intention, the difference between sites I find again by chance and sites I return to on purpose is meaningful and this one has clearly moved into the deliberate return category for me.
Quietly the post solved something I had been turning over without quite knowing how to phrase the question, and a look at biffya extended that quiet solving, content that addresses unformulated needs is content with reader insight and this site has demonstrated that insight at a high rate across the pieces I have read recently.
Came away feeling slightly smarter than I was when I started, that is a real win, and a stop at jillspence added a bit more to that, the rare site that actually transfers some of its knowledge to the reader in a way that sticks rather than just creating an illusion of learning briefly.
Appreciate that you did not pad this with fluff to hit a word count, the post says what it needs to say and stops, and a look at appvineyard did the same, brevity here feels intentional not lazy which is a distinction many writers miss completely sometimes when they are working under deadlines.
Really thankful for posts that respect a reader’s time, this one does, and a quick look at asymmetriesa was the same, no need to scroll through endless intros just to get to the actual content, that approach alone is enough reason to come back here regularly for the kind of writing offered.
Skimmed first and then went back to read carefully, and the careful read paid off in places I had missed, and a stop at alpineapp got the same treatment, the rare site whose content rewards a second pass is content I want more of in my regular rotation rather than disposable single read articles.
Without overstating it this is a quietly excellent post, and a look at susanallen extended that quiet excellence, content that earns superlatives without demanding them through marketing language is content that has truly earned them through the substance and this site has clearly produced work in that earned excellence category today.
Worth saying that the quiet confidence of the writing is what landed first, and a look at carsicka continued that quiet quality, confident writing without the loud display of confidence is a rare combination and this site has clearly developed both the knowledge and the editorial restraint to land that combination consistently.
Now considering writing a longer note about the post somewhere, and a look at solidstack added more material for that note, content that prompts me to write rather than just consume is content with generative energy and this site is producing that generative effect for me at a higher rate than most sources.
Took a quick scan first and then went back to read properly because the post deserved it, and a stop at balinesea kept me reading carefully too, the kind of writing that earns a slower second pass rather than getting skimmed and forgotten is something I value highly when I happen to find it.
Once you start reading carefully here it is hard to go back to lower quality alternatives, and a stop at blog33reality reinforced that ratchet effect, the way good content raises standards is real over time and this site has clearly contributed to raising my expectations for what is possible in writing on the topic generally.