Plutón, Venus, Frege y los misterios del lenguaje natural
Pablo de Lora
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Los lenguajes naturales (el que estoy empleando en este momento) adolecen de algunas patologías bien conocidas, aunque no por ello menos desconcertantes cuando se inspeccionan con los anteojos del filósofo.
Tal vez la más célebre sea la vaguedad de los conceptos. Si bien no todos los lógicos estarían de acuerdo, parece natural decir que algo es o no es algo y tertium non datur (esta es la denominada «ley del tercio excluso», una de las leyes más importantes de la lógica de predicados clásica). Los griegos, sin embargo, pronto advirtieron que las cosas no eran tan simples. Es al lógico megárico Eubúlides de Mileto a quien se atribuye el célebre «razonamiento de Sorites», un razonamiento que nos hace concluir que no existen cosas tales como «montones de arena» («sorites» quiere decir montón en griego) o, alternativamente, que un grano de arena constituye un montón de arena, o que, en algunos casos algo no es ni blanco ni negro sino indeterminado (el vulgar «gris» con el que apuntalar nuestra híbrida toma de posición en las discusiones cotidianas). Eubúlides nos pregunta si billones de granos forman un montón de arena, ante lo cual nuestra respuesta será obviamente que sí. Ese mismo montón lo seguirá siendo aunque sustraigamos uno de los granos, y si proseguimos así, granito a granito, llegará un momento en el que un solo grano seguirá siendo un montón (pruebe el lector a proceder a la inversa para concluir que no existen cosas tales como montones de arena). Lo que el razonamiento o paradoja de Sorites muestra es que no es nunca sencillo determinar con nitidez el punto a partir del cual un objeto se convierte en otra cosa, dónde empieza la línea de la gordura, calvicie, altura, etc. En general, los conceptos de los lenguajes naturales son vagos cuando no somos capaces de listar con precisión absoluta todas las condiciones que algo debe reunir para engrosar la denotación del concepto.
En los últimos tiempos, los astrónomos se las han tenido que ver con la engorrosa vaguedad de los lenguajes naturales (ellos tan acostumbrados a la exactitud del lenguaje formalizado por excelencia, la matemática) cuando de definir lo que es un planeta se ha tratado. El resultado, como saben, ha consistido – y permítaseme la ironía- en expulsar a Plutón del planetario. Y ello no sin arduas discusiones semánticas más propias de juristas, seres afanados en determinar con exactitud (¡oh! ilusos) términos tales como «alevosía», que de científicos naturales. Para más inri, la controversia se ha saldado finalmente mediante votación. Algunos malévolos habrán pensado: «curioso método científico éste». En realidad, que Plutón sea o no un planeta no es un asunto científico, sino puramente nominal. ¡Qué más da cómo le cataloguemos! Los nombres comunes son convenciones lingüísticas, y los problemas de vaguedad se resuelven, como no, acudiendo a una precisión dada en un lenguaje no vago como el matemático. Si por definición decimos que un montón de arena debe tener un número X (siendo X un número entre 0 e infinito) de granos, o un objeto tales y cuales dimensiones para ser un planeta, se acabó el problema. La precisión será convencional también, pero nos salva la vida, o, al menos, nos evita estériles discusiones verbales.
Otro ilustre déficit de los lenguajes naturales que les quiero presentar es la ambigüedad, el fenómeno consistente en que un mismo término cuenta con distintos significados («banco», «puro»). En esos casos, es el contexto donde el término aparece el que nos aclarará su significado. ¿Y el fenómeno inverso? ¿Existen términos o proposiciones distintas con el mismo significado? La respuesta es obviamente sí, si pensamos en Venus, un planeta (de momento) al que durante muchos siglos los seres humanos se han referido con dos expresiones diferentes «la estrella matutina» y «la estrella vespertina» pues creían que de dos objetos distintos se trataba. Desde tiempo ha sabemos que son la misma, así que podemos concluir que:
(1)Venus=estrella matutina
(2)Venus=estrella vespertina
(2)Venus=estrella vespertina
Estos enunciados de identidad supusieron un buen quebradero de cabeza para quien pasa por ser el padre de la lógica matemática contemporánea: Gottlob Frege. La razón es, de nuevo, simple y su solución también conocida y harto discutida. De acuerdo con una vieja distinción debida a Kant, las proposiciones (tales como «Venus es la estrella matutina») pueden ser analíticas o sintéticas. La verdad de las primeras es «definicional», se basa en los significados de los términos empleados. Así, para comprobar que «solterón es el varón no casado», no tengo que desarrollar labor empírica alguna, cosa que sí me es exigida en cambio cuando me las veo con una proposición «sintética» tal como «Venus no contiene agua en su superficie». De las dos oraciones anteriores (1) y (2) yo puedo fácilmente concluir (3) Venus=Venus y (4) la estrella matutina= la estrella vespertina. Esas oraciones son equivalentes, pero su carácter no es el mismo. (3) es una proposición analítica, pero (4) no lo es. (3) no me informa de nada y (4) sí. Esta es la razón por la cual Frege (y después Russell), haciéndose eco de una larga tradición que se remonta a Platón, concluye que los nombres propios como «Venus» o «Shakespeare» sólo denotan (carecen de intensión o connotación), pues en otro caso nos veríamos obligados a admitir que existen enunciados de identidad («Venus es Venus» o «Shakespeare es Shakespeare») de naturaleza contingente (y parece que «Venus es Venus» es una verdad necesaria) o proposiciones sintéticas tales como «Venus es la estrella matutina» o «Shakespeare es el autor de Hamlet» de naturaleza necesaria (y parece que en ambos casos tales proposiciones son verdaderas a posteriori, el fruto de la investigación en el mundo).
En «Über Sinn und Bedeutung» («Sobre el sentido y la referencia», su célebre artículo de 1892) Frege nos ha legado además otra forma de concebir las relaciones de identidad que tanto a lógicos como a matemáticos conduce por las calles de la amargura. De acuerdo con el lógico alemán, expresiones tales como «estrella vespertina=estrella matutina» o «2×2=8-4» tienen la misma referencia («Venus», «4») pero distinto significado. ¿Cómo es ello posible? Porque en estos casos hemos de considerar que el mismo objeto (la referencia de las expresiones o su denotación) es presentado de modos diversos. A ese «presentar» a los objetos de distinto modo Frege lo llama «sentido» (Sinn). Corolario: los términos (de los lenguajes naturales o artificiales) expresan su sentido y denotan su referencia y ambas cosas (sentido y referencia) conjuntamente conforman su significado.
Frege fue el máximo inspirador de una corriente filosófica que no ha hecho gran fortuna: el logicisimo. Junto con otros célebres matemáticos (como David Hilbert) anhelaba poder reducir toda la matemática a unos cuantos axiomas lógicos. Para muchos filósofos de otras disciplinas, el espíritu fregeano ha permeado en la forma de un cierto estilo a la hora de afrontar los problemas filosóficos, una actitud que tiene que ver con la inquisición acerca del sentido en el que las palabras son empleadas en el discurso filosófico o vulgar. Muchos pensamos que en numerosas ocasiones la tarea filosófica prioritaria – y para algunas única- es desvelar esos «modos de ser presentados los objetos o ideas», analizar el lenguaje natural con el que nos referimos al mundo y a nosotros mismos, pues la experiencia nos revela que, como en el caso de Venus, no pocos puzzles metafísicos son sólo aparentes; no pocas de las dificultades anunciadas a bombo y platillo no son tales sino «pseudoproblemas» y no pocos de los misterios filosóficos son tan sólo el resultado de haber llenado con hojarasca semántica el patio de nuestros pensamientos.
A piece that demonstrated competence without performing it, and a look at solidstack maintained the same self assured but unshowy register, the gap between competence and performance of competence is one I track and this site has clearly chosen to demonstrate rather than perform which I find much more persuasive as a reader.
Now noticing how rare it is to find a site that does not feel rushed, and a look at balinesea extended that calm pace, content produced without time pressure has a different quality than content shipped to meet a deadline and this site reads as written without urgency which produces a different and better experience for readers.
Once you start reading carefully here it is hard to go back to lower quality alternatives, and a stop at blog33reality reinforced that ratchet effect, the way good content raises standards is real over time and this site has clearly contributed to raising my expectations for what is possible in writing on the topic generally.
Reading this prompted me to dig into a related topic later, and a stop at canvasgraffiti provided some of the starting points for that follow up reading, content that triggers further exploration rather than satisfying curiosity completely is content with real generative energy and this site has plenty of that energy throughout it.
Worth flagging this site to a few specific friends who would appreciate the editorial sensibility, and a look at bulbula added more pages I will mention to them, recommending sites to specific people requires understanding both the site and the person and this site is making those personalised recommendations easy and natural for me.
Now setting up a small reminder to revisit the site on a slow day, and a stop at validtrove confirmed the reminder was a good idea, planning return visits is a small organisational act that signals trust in ongoing quality and this site has earned that planned return through consistent performance across the pieces I have read so far.
Recommended without reservation for anyone interested in the topic at any level of expertise, and a look at scrapya only strengthens that recommendation, this site clearly knows how to serve readers across a range of backgrounds without watering down the content or talking past anyone in the audience which is genuinely impressive to see.
However measured this site clears the bar I set for sites I take seriously, and a stop at sagepixel continued clearing that bar, the metrics I use for site quality are admittedly informal but they are consistent and this site has cleared them on multiple measurements across multiple visits which is meaningful for my evaluation.
Picked something concrete from the post that I will use immediately, and a look at develite added another concrete piece, content that produces immediately useful output rather than just abstract appreciation is content that earns its place in my regular rotation without needing any further evaluation from me at this point honestly.
Now adjusting my mental list of reliable sites for this topic, and a stop at andreastewart reinforced the adjustment, the small ongoing curation work of maintaining trusted sources is one of the actual practical activities of careful reading and this site has earned a permanent place on my list for this particular subject.
Now setting aside time on my next free afternoon to read more from the archives, and a stop at charlesking confirmed that time will be well spent, the rare site whose archive deserves a dedicated reading session rather than just casual sampling is the kind of resource worth scheduling around and this one qualifies clearly.
Did not expect much when I clicked through but ended up reading the whole thing carefully, and a stop at knavea kept that engagement going, sometimes the unassuming sites turn out to deliver more than the flashy ones which is something I have learned to look out for over time online lately and across topics.
Highly recommend to anyone looking for a sensible take on this topic without the usual marketing nonsense, and a look at badmoutha kept that grounded approach going, sites that stay focused on serving readers rather than monetising every click are rare and this is clearly one of those rare ones I really appreciate finding.
Most of my reading time goes to a small number of trusted sources and this one is now joining that group, and a stop at dataoasis reinforced the group membership, the few sites that earn a place in my regular rotation are sites I expect ongoing returns from and this one has earned that elevated position consistently.
Took longer than expected to finish because I kept stopping to think, and a stop at penvibes did the same to me, content that provokes thought rather than just delivering information is in a different category and the team here is clearly working at that higher level rather than just cranking out posts.
Sets a higher bar than most of what shows up in search results for this topic, and a look at fbgm did not lower that bar at all, in fact it confirmed the impression, this is the kind of consistency that earns a place in regular rotation for serious readers instead of casual scrollers passing through.
Liked how the post handled an objection I was forming as I read, and a stop at myriadcloud similarly anticipated where my thinking was going next, the rare writer who can predict reader concerns and address them in advance is doing something most online content fails to do despite that being basic editorial work.
Appreciate the work that went into laying this out so clearly, every section earns its place without filler, and a look at nanothailand confirmed the same care, definitely the kind of place that deserves a return visit when the topic comes up again later in the future or for any related question.
Generally I am cautious about recommending sites on first encounter but this one warrants the exception, and a look at blog66full reinforced the exception making, the rare site that justifies breaking my normal cautious approach is the rare site worth flagging early and this one has prompted exactly that early flagging response from me.
Picked a single sentence from this post to remember, and a look at teezambia gave me another to keep, content that produces memorable lines is doing more than just transferring information and the small selection of sentences I keep from each reading session is one of the actual returns I get from reading carefully.
During a quiet evening reading session this provided just the right depth without being heavy, and a stop at bradleyhart maintained the same evening appropriate weight, content with depth that does not exhaust the reader is content with editorial calibration and this site has clearly figured out how to be substantial without being demanding all the time.
Now feeling the post has earned a proper recommendation rather than a casual mention, and a stop at mariesnyder reinforced the recommendation strength, the difference between mentioning and recommending is a small editorial distinction I observe in my own conversations and this site has earned the upgraded recommendation level from me confidently today.
Just want to acknowledge that the writing here is doing something right, and a quick visit to argonapp confirmed the same standards run across the broader site, recognising good work is something I try to do when I find it because the alternative is silence and silence rewards mediocrity.
Skipped the comments to avoid spoilers and came back later to find them genuinely worth reading, and a stop at onyxdash extended that surprised respect, when the discussion below a post matches the quality of the post itself you have found something special and this site appears to attract that kind of audience.
Now feeling the rare pleasure of trusting a source completely on first encounter, and a look at magnamode extended that initial trust into something more durable, the calibration of trust to evidence is something I do informally and this site has earned high trust through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good posts already.
Really appreciate that the writer did not assume I would read every other related post first, and a look at wendysilva kept that self contained feel going where each piece can stand alone, accessibility for new readers is a sign of generous editorial thinking and this site has clearly invested in that approach.
Now considering whether the post would translate well into a different form, and a look at ordersimple suggested similar versatility, content that could move into other media without losing its substance is content that has been built around ideas rather than around format and this site reads as idea first throughout posts.
Now recognising the specific pleasure of reading writing that shows real care for sentence shapes, and a look at echodomain extended that craft pleasure, sentence level writing quality is something most blog content ignores entirely and this site has clearly invested in the prose layer alongside the substance which is rare today.
Picked this post to share in a Slack channel where I knew it would be appreciated, and a look at a-nz47 suggested I will share more from here later, content worth sharing into a professional context is content that has earned a higher kind of trust than mere personal interest and this site has it.
If a friend asked me where to read carefully on the topic I would send them here without hesitation, and a look at earsurgeon confirmed the recommendation strength, the directness of my recommendation reflects how confident I am in the quality and this site has earned undiluted recommendations from me across multiple recent conversations actually.
After several visits I am now confident this site is one to follow seriously, and a stop at resellinga reinforced that confidence, the gradual building of trust through repeated quality exposures is the only sustainable way to develop reader loyalty and this site is building that loyalty in me through patient consistent work consistently.
Thanks for the practical examples scattered through the post rather than abstract theory only, and a look at validpath continued that grounded style, abstract points are easier to remember when paired with concrete situations and the writers here clearly understand how readers actually retain information from blog content reading sessions.
Bookmark folder created specifically for this site, and a look at fastfield confirmed the dedicated folder was the right call, dedicated folders for individual sites are a level of organisation I rarely deploy and this site has earned that level of dedicated tracking based on the consistency I have seen so far across sessions.
During a quiet evening reading session this provided just the right depth without being heavy, and a stop at vegaterbaik maintained the same evening appropriate weight, content with depth that does not exhaust the reader is content with editorial calibration and this site has clearly figured out how to be substantial without being demanding all the time.
Came in tired from a long day and the writing held my attention anyway, and a stop at wandabruce kept that going, content that can engage a fatigued reader is doing something right because most online reading happens in suboptimal conditions like that one and quality content adapts to it without complaint.
Reading this brought back the satisfaction I used to get from blogs ten years ago, and a stop at directionguidesaction kept that nostalgic quality alive, sites that capture what was good about an earlier era of internet writing are increasingly precious and this one is doing that without feeling like a deliberate throwback at all.
Bookmark added with a small note about why, and a look at directionfeedsprogress prompted another bookmark with another note, the bookmarks I annotate are the ones I expect to return to deliberately rather than stumble into and this site is generating annotated bookmarks at a higher rate than my usual content sources by some margin.
Liked the way the post got out of its own way, and a stop at clarityopensprogress extended that invisible craft, the best writing you barely notice while reading because it is doing its work without drawing attention to itself and this site has clearly mastered that disappearing act across the pieces I have read.
Honest take is that this was better than I expected when I clicked through, and a look at opsorder reinforced that, the bar for online content has dropped so much that finding something thoughtful and well constructed feels almost noteworthy now which says more about the average than about this site itself.
Found this useful, the points line up well with what I have been thinking about lately, and a stop at claritydrivesspeed added some angles I had not considered yet, definitely walking away with more than I came for which is the best outcome from time spent reading online for any kind of topic.
Such writing is increasingly rare and worth supporting through attention, and a stop at directiondrivesmotion extended that supportive attention across more pages, the conscious choice to spend time on sites that produce careful work rather than convenient consumption is itself a small form of patronage and this site is receiving that conscious patronage from me.
Refreshing change from the usual sites covering this topic, no clickbait and no padding, and a stop at signalactivatesdirection confirmed the difference, this place clearly has its own voice rather than copying the formulas everyone else uses to chase clicks online which is becoming increasingly rare these days across nearly every popular subject.
Now feeling the rare pleasure of trusting a source completely on first encounter, and a look at claritysetsprogress extended that initial trust into something more durable, the calibration of trust to evidence is something I do informally and this site has earned high trust through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good posts already.
Now placing this in the small category of sites whose updates I would actually want to know about, and a stop at growthmovesclean confirmed that placement, the difference between sites I want to follow and sites I just consume from is real and this one has crossed into the active follow category from the casual consumption side.
Nice and clean, that is the best way to describe the writing here, no clutter and no wasted words, and a quick visit to forwardenergyengine kept that going, I appreciate when a site treats its readers like people who can think for themselves without needing constant hand holding through every paragraph.
Really thankful for posts that respect a reader’s time, this one does, and a quick look at growthmovesbychoice was the same, no need to scroll through endless intros just to get to the actual content, that approach alone is enough reason to come back here regularly for the kind of writing offered.
Genuine reaction is that this site clicked with how I like to read, and a look at growthmoveswithsignal kept that comfortable fit going, sometimes you find a place online whose editorial decisions just align with your preferences and when that happens it is worth recognising and supporting through repeat engagement consistently going forward.
Started reading expecting to disagree and ended mostly nodding along, and a look at momentumfollowsfocus continued the pattern, content that wins agreement through evidence and reasoning rather than rhetorical force is the kind that actually shifts minds and this site clearly knows how to do that across what I have read so far.
Decided not to comment because the post said what needed saying, and a stop at ashleywoods continued that complete feel, content that does not invite obvious additions or corrections from readers is content that has been carefully considered and this site appears to consistently produce pieces that satisfy rather than provoke unnecessary follow ups.
Really appreciate the confidence to make a clear point rather than hedging everything, and a quick visit to focussetsdirection maintained the same direct stance, writing that takes positions rather than equivocating is more useful even when the positions are debatable because at least the reader has something to react to clearly.