El próximo vuelo del Discovery y la Astrofísica Espacial
Miguel Mas Hesse
LAEFF-CSIC
Dentro de unas semanas será lanzado de nuevo el «Space Shuttle» Discovery, de la NASA, camino de la Estación Espacial Internacional (ISS). El éxito de este vuelo es fundamental para la investigación espacial en general, ya que los vuelos del Shuttle son necesarios para completar la ISS. Pero el éxito es también imprescindible para el futuro de la Astrofísica Espacial, ya que de él depende el que el Telescopio Espacial Hubble (HST) pueda seguir operativo unos años más.
¿Cómo es posible que nos encontremos en una situación en que tanto el futuro de la ISS como el del HST dependan del lanzamiento de un Space Shuttle, algo que considerábamos trivial hasta hace poco tiempo? Hagamos un poco de historia. El acceso del Hombre al Espacio se materializó en los años 60 del siglo pasado por medio de pequeñas cápsulas presurizadas que eran impulsadas por potentes cohetes. Estas cápsulas eran muy pequeñas, y en los primeros tiempos tan sólo dejaban espacio para 1 o 2 astronautas sentados, que tenían que permanecer en esa posición durante el desarrollo de la misión. Por el lado americano este concepto llegó a su punto culminante con la combinación de las cápsulas Apollo, que incluían un módulo de servicio más amplio, y los lanzadores Saturno V, fruto del ingenio del hoy ya mítico Wernher von Braun. El Saturno V es el cohete más potente y más fiable (ningún fallo) que ha fabricado el Hombre, más potente incluso que los «Space Shuttle» modernos.
El Apollo 13 en su plataforma de lanzamiento
Pero el coste de cada lanzamiento era prohibitivo. Por este motivo, a comienzos de los años 70 NASA decidió desarrollar un sistema de lanzaderas espaciales que fueran potentes, versátiles, y mucho más baratas. El concepto básica fue la capacidad de reutilización, con el objetivo de reducir costes. En el Shuttle se aprovechan casi todos los elementos, excepto el tanque exterior de combustible. Tanto la nave como los motores principales regresan a Tierra y pueden volar múltiples veces. Sin embargo, lo que parecía una buena idea no resultó tan buena después de todo. Para que un Shuttle vuelva a volar repetidamente a lo largo de los años en condiciones de seguridad hacen falta revisiones y mejoras tan profundas que el coste de cada misión sigue siendo muy elevado.
Lanzamiento de la misión Discovery STS141
Los soviéticos optaron por un concepto más clásico: siguieron desarrollando sus cápsulas tipo Soyuz, que son lanzadas por cohetes fabricados en serie a un coste relativamente bajo. En los años 80 intentaron copiar el diseño de los Shuttle americanos, pero su nave Buran acoplada a un cohete Energya sólo realizó un vuelo de prueba. La crisis de la URSS impidió el desarrollo del sistema, pese a sus ventajas.
Los Shuttle americanos han realizado ya numerosas misiones con éxito. Pero desgraciadamente adolecen de defectos de diseño que los hacen más vulnerables de lo que sería aceptable. No olvidemos que el diseño básico es de los años 70 del pasado siglo. El primer defecto grave afectó a los motores de combustible sólido: un error de diseño en unas simples juntas de caucho provocaron que el Challenger estallara durante el lanzamiento en enero de 1986. A pesar de la gravedad del accidente, el defecto era relativamente simple y fue corregido rápidamente. Pero hay otro problema de diseño mucho más serio: el Shuttle despega acoplado al gigantesco depósito de hidrógeno y oxígenos líquidos, que sobresale claramente por encima de la nave. Este depósito se encuentra a temperaturas criogénicas por lo que, a pesar de los aislantes, se forma hielo en su superficie cuando se encuentra en la rampa de lanzamiento. Al encender los motores, gruesos bloques de hielo se desprenden y golpean contra la estructura del Shuttle, produciendo daños en el aislamiento térmico. Este problema ha ocurrido desde los primeros días del Shuttle, y siempre se consideró normal que algunas losetas térmicas se desprendieran. Pero en el último lanzamiento del Columbia, en 2003, un bloque de hielo dañó el borde de ataque de una de las alas. En la reentrada, el gas a altas temperaturas penetró por allí y llevó a la destrucción completa de la nave. Este problema podría haber sucedido, de hecho, en cualquier otro vuelo anterior.
Astronautas realizando operaciones de mantenimiento en el HST en 1997
NASA reaccionó rediseñando el tanque de combustible. Durante el último vuelo del Discovery el pasado otoño se probó el nuevo diseño, pero para desesperación de los ingenieros de NASA, gruesos bloques de hielo volvieron a caer sobre el Shuttle, forzando una reparación en órbita de los paneles dañados. Dentro de unas semanas se procederá a una nueva prueba con el Discovery. En esta ocasión los ingenieros esperan que los problemas se hayan solucionado.
No sólo los ingenieros lo esperan. Mientras el problema no esté bajo control, NASA decidió que los Shuttle sólo volarían a la ISS, de manera que si se detecta algún daño los astronautas podrían refugiarse allí y retornar mediante una cápsula Soyuz que permanece permanentemente atracada. Esto implica que hoy por hoy NASA no autoriza que el Shuttle visite el HST, una visita necesaria para reemplazar los giróscopos e instalar nuevos instrumentos. Sin esta visita será difícil que el HST pueda continuar sus operaciones mucho más allá de 2008. De hecho, sin el empuje periódico del Shuttle, el HST acabará cayendo al océano de manera descontrolada en un plazo relativamente corto.
El Shuttle Discovery atracado en la ISS durante su último vuelo
Esperemos por lo tanto que NASA vuelva a poner en operación su flota de Shuttles, que sean capaces de terminar la construcción de la ISS, y que puedan volver a dejar el HST en condiciones óptimas de funcionamiento dentro de un par de años.
Genuinely changed how I think about a small piece of the topic, which does not happen often online, and a look at argonapp added another nudge in the same direction, the kind of writing that earns a small mental shift rather than just confirming what you already thought before reading is a sign of careful thought.
Liked the post enough to read it twice and the second read found new things, and a stop at starfleeta similarly rewarded the second look, content with hidden depths that only reveal themselves on careful rereading is the rare kind that earns lasting respect rather than fleeting first impressions only briefly held.
Worth flagging this site to a few specific friends who would appreciate the editorial sensibility, and a look at onyxdash added more pages I will mention to them, recommending sites to specific people requires understanding both the site and the person and this site is making those personalised recommendations easy and natural for me.
Skipped past the first paragraph thinking it was setup and had to come back when the rest referenced it, and a stop at magnamode similarly rewarded careful reading from the start, content where every paragraph carries weight is content I now know to read from the beginning rather than skipping ahead.
A piece that reads as if the writer trusted readers to fill in obvious gaps, and a look at wendysilva continued that respectful approach, content that does not over explain what the reader can infer is content that respects intelligence and this site has clearly chosen to write to capable readers rather than to the lowest common denominator.
If a friend asked me where to read carefully on the topic I would send them here without hesitation, and a look at webwoods confirmed the recommendation strength, the directness of my recommendation reflects how confident I am in the quality and this site has earned undiluted recommendations from me across multiple recent conversations actually.
Now feeling slightly more optimistic about the state of independent writing online, and a stop at flowbase extended that quiet optimism, sites like this one are the reason I have not given up on the open web entirely and finding them occasionally renews the case for paying attention to non algorithmic content sources today.
A piece that read as if the writer was thinking carefully rather than just typing fluently, and a look at ordersimple continued that considered quality, the difference between fluent typing and careful thinking shows up in writing and this site reads as the product of thought rather than just the product of language fluency apparently.
Really like that the writer trusts the reader to follow simple logic without restating every previous point, and a stop at echodomain kept that respect going, treating an audience as capable adults rather than as people who need constant hand holding makes a noticeable difference in the reading experience for me.
After reading several posts back to back the consistent voice across them is impressive, and a stop at a-nz47 continued that voice consistency, sites that maintain a single coherent voice across many pieces by potentially many writers represent serious editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed the institutional consistency needed for that.
High quality writing, no marketing speak and no buzzwords that mean nothing, and a stop at webvineyard kept that going, simple direct content that actually communicates something is harder to find than it should be and this is one of the rare places that gets it right consistently across many different posts.
Honestly the simplicity of the explanation made the topic click for me in a way other writeups had not, and a look at brickbase continued that clarity into related areas, when a writer gets the level of explanation right the reader does the heavy lifting themselves and the post just enables it.
Now feeling something close to gratitude for the fact this site exists, and a look at xylowise extended that gratitude, the rare site that produces this kind of response is the rare site worth defending in conversations about whether the modern internet is still capable of producing genuinely valuable independent content for serious adults.
Speaking carefully because I do not want to overstate things this site is genuinely above average across multiple measurements, and a stop at resellinga continued the above average performance, the calibration of judgement against potential overstatement is something I take seriously and this site clears the higher bar even after that calibration applies.
A piece that exhibited the kind of patience that good writing requires, and a look at validpath continued that patient quality, hurried writing is easy to spot and this site reads as having been written without time pressure which produces a different feel than the rushed content that dominates much of the modern blog space.
Worth pointing out that the writing reads as confident without being defensive about it, and a look at softelite extended that secure tone, content that does not pre emptively argue against imagined critics has a different quality from defensive writing and this site reads as written from a place of real ease.
Liked the post enough to read it twice and the second read found new things, and a stop at vegaterbaik similarly rewarded the second look, content with hidden depths that only reveal themselves on careful rereading is the rare kind that earns lasting respect rather than fleeting first impressions only briefly held.
Now planning to recommend this site in a context where my recommendations are taken seriously, and a stop at softsmith confirmed I should make that recommendation soon, the small but real act of recommending content into spaces where my taste matters is something I take seriously and this site is worth the recommendation.
Left me wanting to read more rather than feeling burned out, that is a good sign, and a look at forwardmotionstarts confirmed there is plenty more here to explore, the kind of writing that builds appetite rather than killing it which is a rare quality on the modern open internet today across most categories of content.
Genuinely useful read, the points are practical and easy to apply right away, and a quick look at directionguidesaction confirmed that this site is consistent in that approach, looking forward to digging through the rest of it when I get the chance to sit down properly later in the week or this weekend.
Looking forward to seeing what gets published next month, and a look at golddomain extended that anticipation across the broader site, finding myself looking forward to a sites future content rather than just consuming its existing content is a stronger commitment level than I usually reach with new finds and this site triggered that.
Considered as a whole this site has developed a coherent point of view that comes through in individual pieces, and a look at focuscreatesmomentum continued displaying that coherence, sites with a unified perspective rather than a grab bag of takes are sites with editorial maturity and this one has clearly developed that maturity through years of work.
If a friend asked me where to read carefully on the topic I would send them here without hesitation, and a look at directionfeedsprogress confirmed the recommendation strength, the directness of my recommendation reflects how confident I am in the quality and this site has earned undiluted recommendations from me across multiple recent conversations actually.
Liked the careful selection of which details to include and which to skip, and a stop at claritydrivesspeed reflected the same editorial judgement, knowing what to leave out is just as important as knowing what to include and this site has clearly figured out where that line sits for the topics it covers regularly.
Solid quality, the kind of work that holds up to a careful read rather than a quick skim, and a quick look at blog33candidate kept that standard going strong, content that rewards attention rather than punishing it is something I appreciate more and more these days online across nearly every topic I follow.
Worth marking the moment when reading this clicked into something useful for my own work, and a look at ideasdriveforward extended that practical click, content that connects to my actual life rather than just being interesting is content with the highest kind of value and this site is generating that connection at a high rate.
The headings made navigating the post simple even when I needed to find a specific section quickly, and a look at directiondrivesmotion continued the same thoughtful structure, small details like clear headings show that someone is actually thinking about how the reader uses the page rather than just filling it for length alone.
Different in a good way from the cookie cutter content that fills most blogs covering this area, and a stop at ideasgainstructure kept showing me why, original thoughtful writing exists if you know where to look and this site has earned a place on my short list of those rare exceptions worth defending.
Worth a quiet moment of recognition for the consistency I have noticed across multiple posts, and a stop at claritysetsprogress continued that consistent quality, sites that maintain quality across many pieces rather than peaking on one viral post are sites with real editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed that discipline carefully.
A small editorial detail caught my attention, the way headings related to body text, and a look at growthmovesclean maintained that careful relationship, structural details like that show up to readers who notice them and the writers here have clearly thought about every level of the piece rather than just the words.
Spent a few minutes here and came away with a clearer picture of the topic, the writing keeps things simple without dumbing them down, and after a stop at forwardenergyengine the rest of the points lined up neatly which is something I appreciate when I am short on time and need answers fast.
Now planning to share the link with a small group of readers I trust, and a look at blog33southern suggested more material to share with the same group, recommending content into a curated circle requires confidence in the recommendation and this site is making me confident in those personal recommendations on multiple separate occasions now.
Quality work here, the post reads cleanly and the points stay focused throughout, and a stop at directionguidesmomentum kept the standard high, you can tell the writer cares about the final result rather than just hitting publish for the sake of having something new on the page to feed the search engines.
Now recognising the editorial wisdom of letting some questions remain open at the end, and a look at growthmovesbychoice continued that intellectual honesty, content that does not force closure on contested questions is content that respects the limits of knowledge and this site has clearly developed the maturity to know when to leave space.
Came across this looking for something else entirely and ended up reading it through twice, and a look at growthmoveswithsignal pulled me deeper into the site than I planned, the writing has a way of holding attention without resorting to manipulative cliffhangers or vague promises that never get delivered later down the page.
Really like that there are no exclamation marks or all caps shouting throughout the post, and a quick visit to blog33before maintained the same calm voice, restraint in punctuation signals confidence in the content and this site clearly trusts its substance to do the persuading rather than relying on typographic emphasis.
A piece that earned its conclusions through the body rather than asserting them at the end, and a look at ashleywoods maintained the same earned quality, conclusions that follow from what came before are more persuasive than declarations and this site has clearly internalised that principle in how it constructs arguments throughout pieces.
Once I trust a site this much I tend to read everything they publish and that is the trajectory I am on with this one, and a stop at directioncreatesmovement confirmed the trajectory, the rare progression from interested reader to comprehensive reader is something only certain sites earn and this one is earning that progression rapidly.
Glad I gave this a chance rather than scrolling past, and a stop at growthalignsforward confirmed I made the right call, sometimes the best content is hidden behind unassuming headlines that do not scream for attention and learning to slow down and check those out has paid off many times now across years of reading.
Honestly this kind of writing is why I still bother to read independent sites, and a look at actiondrivenmovement extended that broader reflection, the few sites that justify continued attention to non algorithmic content are sites like this one and finding them periodically is enough to keep my reading habits oriented toward independent rather than aggregated content.
Honestly this was the highlight of my reading queue today, and a look at focusguidesgrowth extended that across more pages I will return to, ranking what I read against what else I read each day is something I do informally and this site keeps moving up in those rankings the more I explore it.
Worth pointing out the careful word choice in this post, no buzzwords and no jargon, and a look at ideasbecomeresults continued that disciplined vocabulary, sites that resist the pull of trendy language are sites that will read well in five years and this one is clearly built for that kind of long durability.
Worth flagging that this approach to the topic is fresh without being contrarian, and a stop at claritydrivenmotion extended the same fresh angle, finding original perspective on familiar subjects is rare and this site has clearly developed its own way of seeing rather than echoing the dominant takes from elsewhere consistently.
Closed the post with a small satisfied sigh, and a stop at actionmovesstrategy produced the same gentle exhale, content that ends well is content that respects the rhythm of reading and the writers here have clearly thought about how their pieces close rather than just trailing off when they run out of things to say.
Reading carefully this time rather than scanning, and the depth shows up in places I missed first time around, and a look at ideasigniteprogress rewarded the same careful approach, content that holds up to multiple reads is content I want more of in my regular rotation rather than disposable scroll fodder daily.