Plutón, Venus, Frege y los misterios del lenguaje natural
Pablo de Lora
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Los lenguajes naturales (el que estoy empleando en este momento) adolecen de algunas patologías bien conocidas, aunque no por ello menos desconcertantes cuando se inspeccionan con los anteojos del filósofo.
Tal vez la más célebre sea la vaguedad de los conceptos. Si bien no todos los lógicos estarían de acuerdo, parece natural decir que algo es o no es algo y tertium non datur (esta es la denominada «ley del tercio excluso», una de las leyes más importantes de la lógica de predicados clásica). Los griegos, sin embargo, pronto advirtieron que las cosas no eran tan simples. Es al lógico megárico Eubúlides de Mileto a quien se atribuye el célebre «razonamiento de Sorites», un razonamiento que nos hace concluir que no existen cosas tales como «montones de arena» («sorites» quiere decir montón en griego) o, alternativamente, que un grano de arena constituye un montón de arena, o que, en algunos casos algo no es ni blanco ni negro sino indeterminado (el vulgar «gris» con el que apuntalar nuestra híbrida toma de posición en las discusiones cotidianas). Eubúlides nos pregunta si billones de granos forman un montón de arena, ante lo cual nuestra respuesta será obviamente que sí. Ese mismo montón lo seguirá siendo aunque sustraigamos uno de los granos, y si proseguimos así, granito a granito, llegará un momento en el que un solo grano seguirá siendo un montón (pruebe el lector a proceder a la inversa para concluir que no existen cosas tales como montones de arena). Lo que el razonamiento o paradoja de Sorites muestra es que no es nunca sencillo determinar con nitidez el punto a partir del cual un objeto se convierte en otra cosa, dónde empieza la línea de la gordura, calvicie, altura, etc. En general, los conceptos de los lenguajes naturales son vagos cuando no somos capaces de listar con precisión absoluta todas las condiciones que algo debe reunir para engrosar la denotación del concepto.
En los últimos tiempos, los astrónomos se las han tenido que ver con la engorrosa vaguedad de los lenguajes naturales (ellos tan acostumbrados a la exactitud del lenguaje formalizado por excelencia, la matemática) cuando de definir lo que es un planeta se ha tratado. El resultado, como saben, ha consistido – y permítaseme la ironía- en expulsar a Plutón del planetario. Y ello no sin arduas discusiones semánticas más propias de juristas, seres afanados en determinar con exactitud (¡oh! ilusos) términos tales como «alevosía», que de científicos naturales. Para más inri, la controversia se ha saldado finalmente mediante votación. Algunos malévolos habrán pensado: «curioso método científico éste». En realidad, que Plutón sea o no un planeta no es un asunto científico, sino puramente nominal. ¡Qué más da cómo le cataloguemos! Los nombres comunes son convenciones lingüísticas, y los problemas de vaguedad se resuelven, como no, acudiendo a una precisión dada en un lenguaje no vago como el matemático. Si por definición decimos que un montón de arena debe tener un número X (siendo X un número entre 0 e infinito) de granos, o un objeto tales y cuales dimensiones para ser un planeta, se acabó el problema. La precisión será convencional también, pero nos salva la vida, o, al menos, nos evita estériles discusiones verbales.
Otro ilustre déficit de los lenguajes naturales que les quiero presentar es la ambigüedad, el fenómeno consistente en que un mismo término cuenta con distintos significados («banco», «puro»). En esos casos, es el contexto donde el término aparece el que nos aclarará su significado. ¿Y el fenómeno inverso? ¿Existen términos o proposiciones distintas con el mismo significado? La respuesta es obviamente sí, si pensamos en Venus, un planeta (de momento) al que durante muchos siglos los seres humanos se han referido con dos expresiones diferentes «la estrella matutina» y «la estrella vespertina» pues creían que de dos objetos distintos se trataba. Desde tiempo ha sabemos que son la misma, así que podemos concluir que:
(1)Venus=estrella matutina
(2)Venus=estrella vespertina
(2)Venus=estrella vespertina
Estos enunciados de identidad supusieron un buen quebradero de cabeza para quien pasa por ser el padre de la lógica matemática contemporánea: Gottlob Frege. La razón es, de nuevo, simple y su solución también conocida y harto discutida. De acuerdo con una vieja distinción debida a Kant, las proposiciones (tales como «Venus es la estrella matutina») pueden ser analíticas o sintéticas. La verdad de las primeras es «definicional», se basa en los significados de los términos empleados. Así, para comprobar que «solterón es el varón no casado», no tengo que desarrollar labor empírica alguna, cosa que sí me es exigida en cambio cuando me las veo con una proposición «sintética» tal como «Venus no contiene agua en su superficie». De las dos oraciones anteriores (1) y (2) yo puedo fácilmente concluir (3) Venus=Venus y (4) la estrella matutina= la estrella vespertina. Esas oraciones son equivalentes, pero su carácter no es el mismo. (3) es una proposición analítica, pero (4) no lo es. (3) no me informa de nada y (4) sí. Esta es la razón por la cual Frege (y después Russell), haciéndose eco de una larga tradición que se remonta a Platón, concluye que los nombres propios como «Venus» o «Shakespeare» sólo denotan (carecen de intensión o connotación), pues en otro caso nos veríamos obligados a admitir que existen enunciados de identidad («Venus es Venus» o «Shakespeare es Shakespeare») de naturaleza contingente (y parece que «Venus es Venus» es una verdad necesaria) o proposiciones sintéticas tales como «Venus es la estrella matutina» o «Shakespeare es el autor de Hamlet» de naturaleza necesaria (y parece que en ambos casos tales proposiciones son verdaderas a posteriori, el fruto de la investigación en el mundo).
En «Über Sinn und Bedeutung» («Sobre el sentido y la referencia», su célebre artículo de 1892) Frege nos ha legado además otra forma de concebir las relaciones de identidad que tanto a lógicos como a matemáticos conduce por las calles de la amargura. De acuerdo con el lógico alemán, expresiones tales como «estrella vespertina=estrella matutina» o «2×2=8-4» tienen la misma referencia («Venus», «4») pero distinto significado. ¿Cómo es ello posible? Porque en estos casos hemos de considerar que el mismo objeto (la referencia de las expresiones o su denotación) es presentado de modos diversos. A ese «presentar» a los objetos de distinto modo Frege lo llama «sentido» (Sinn). Corolario: los términos (de los lenguajes naturales o artificiales) expresan su sentido y denotan su referencia y ambas cosas (sentido y referencia) conjuntamente conforman su significado.
Frege fue el máximo inspirador de una corriente filosófica que no ha hecho gran fortuna: el logicisimo. Junto con otros célebres matemáticos (como David Hilbert) anhelaba poder reducir toda la matemática a unos cuantos axiomas lógicos. Para muchos filósofos de otras disciplinas, el espíritu fregeano ha permeado en la forma de un cierto estilo a la hora de afrontar los problemas filosóficos, una actitud que tiene que ver con la inquisición acerca del sentido en el que las palabras son empleadas en el discurso filosófico o vulgar. Muchos pensamos que en numerosas ocasiones la tarea filosófica prioritaria – y para algunas única- es desvelar esos «modos de ser presentados los objetos o ideas», analizar el lenguaje natural con el que nos referimos al mundo y a nosotros mismos, pues la experiencia nos revela que, como en el caso de Venus, no pocos puzzles metafísicos son sólo aparentes; no pocas de las dificultades anunciadas a bombo y platillo no son tales sino «pseudoproblemas» y no pocos de los misterios filosóficos son tan sólo el resultado de haber llenado con hojarasca semántica el patio de nuestros pensamientos.
Worth pointing out that the writer made the topic feel more interesting than I had been expecting, and a look at hollycline continued that elevation effect, content that improves the apparent quality of its subject through skilled treatment is doing something real and this site has clearly developed that kind of editorial alchemy throughout.
Refreshing to read something where the words actually mean something instead of filling space, and a stop at katherinekrause kept that going, the writing here trusts the reader to follow along without endless repetition or constant reminders of what was already said earlier in the post which I appreciate.
I learned more from this short post than from longer articles I read earlier today, and a stop at worldhenchmen added even more useful detail without going off topic, this site clearly knows how to keep things focused without sacrificing depth which is a hard balance to strike for any writer.
Now feeling that this site is the kind I want to make sure does not disappear, and a look at a-nz36 reinforced that quiet protective feeling, the rare sites whose disappearance would actually matter to me are the sites I want to support through return visits and recommendations and this one has joined that small protected list.
Speaking as someone who reads a lot on this topic this site has earned a high position in my source rankings, and a stop at webskins reinforced that ranking, the informal ranking of sources for a topic is something I maintain mentally and this site has moved into the upper portion of those rankings clearly.
If I had to defend the time I spend reading independent blogs this site would feature in the defence, and a look at blog44throws reinforced that defensive utility, the ongoing case for non algorithmic reading is one I make to myself periodically and sites like this one provide the actual evidence that supports the case clearly.
Now realising this site has been quietly doing good work for longer than I knew, and a look at karenday suggested an archive worth exploring, sites with deep archives of consistent quality represent a different kind of resource than sites with viral hits and this one looks like the durable kind based on what I see.
Closed the tab feeling I had spent the time well, and a stop at pananole extended that feeling across more pages, the test of whether time on a site was well spent is one I apply silently after closing tabs and very few sites pass it but this one passed it cleanly today afternoon clearly.
A particular kind of restraint shows up in the writing, and a look at softfortune maintained the same restraint across pages, knowing what not to say is just as important as knowing what to say and this site has clearly developed strong instincts on both sides of that editorial line throughout pieces I have read.
Skipped past the first paragraph thinking it was setup and had to come back when the rest referenced it, and a stop at auroraopera similarly rewarded careful reading from the start, content where every paragraph carries weight is content I now know to read from the beginning rather than skipping ahead.
Great work on keeping things readable, the post never drags or repeats itself which I really appreciate, and a stop at johnpadilla added a bit more context that fit naturally with what was already said here, no need to read everything twice to get the point being made today.
Glad I gave this fifteen minutes rather than the usual three minute skim, and a look at blog33mother earned the same investment, time spent on quality content is rarely wasted but the reverse is also true and learning which sites deserve which kind of attention is part of being a careful online reader.
Picked something concrete from the post that I will use immediately, and a look at malabardiocese added another concrete piece, content that produces immediately useful output rather than just abstract appreciation is content that earns its place in my regular rotation without needing any further evaluation from me at this point honestly.
Worth saying that the prose reads naturally without straining for style, and a stop at zealwork maintained the same unforced quality, writing that achieves elegance without effort is the highest tier and this site has clearly worked out how to land that effortless quality consistently rather than only on the writers best days.
Now setting this aside as a model of how to write thoughtfully on the topic, and a stop at a-nz46 extended that model status, content that becomes a reference for how a kind of writing should be done is content with influence beyond its own readership and this site is reaching that level for me clearly today.
Now feeling the quiet pleasure of finding writing that takes itself seriously without being self serious, and a stop at joshnorman extended that subtle pleasure, the gap between earnest and pretentious is fine and this site has clearly chosen to land on the earnest side without slipping over into pretentious which is impressive.
Reading this felt easy in the best way, no friction and no confusion at any point, and a stop at drnicoleweaver carried that same comfort across more pages, the kind of editorial flow that lets you absorb information without fighting the format which is increasingly hard to find on the open web today across topics.
Top tier post, the kind that makes you want to share the link with friends working in the same area, and a stop at physicsgoldmine only made me more confident in doing that, this site is one of the better resources I have seen on the topic recently across both new and older posts.
Reading more of the archives is now on my plan for the weekend, and a stop at jonathanhogan confirmed the archive worth the time, the rare archive worth a dedicated reading session rather than just casual sampling is the rare archive of serious work and this site has clearly produced enough of that work to warrant the deeper exploration.
This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at guamsymphony kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.
Closed the laptop after this and let the ideas settle for a few hours, and a stop at devomega similarly rewarded reflective time, content that benefits from sitting with rather than racing past is the kind I want more of and the kind that this site appears to consistently produce week after week here.
Easy to recommend, the content speaks for itself without needing additional praise from me, and a stop at drgregorythompson only adds more reasons to send people this way, the kind of generous resource that benefits its readers without demanding anything in return is increasingly rare and worth recognising clearly today across the broader open internet.
Reading this brought back the satisfaction I used to get from blogs ten years ago, and a stop at zincbyte kept that nostalgic quality alive, sites that capture what was good about an earlier era of internet writing are increasingly precious and this one is doing that without feeling like a deliberate throwback at all.
Bookmark folder created specifically for this site, and a look at wickedradio confirmed the dedicated folder was the right call, dedicated folders for individual sites are a level of organisation I rarely deploy and this site has earned that level of dedicated tracking based on the consistency I have seen so far across sessions.
Refreshing change from the usual sites covering this topic, no clickbait and no padding, and a stop at a-nz34 confirmed the difference, this place clearly has its own voice rather than copying the formulas everyone else uses to chase clicks online which is becoming increasingly rare these days across nearly every popular subject.
Worth saying this site reads better than most paid newsletters I have tried, and a stop at joshuayoder confirmed that comparison, the bar for free content is often lower than for paid but this site clears the paid bar consistently and that says something about the editorial approach behind the work being published here regularly.
Picked this for my morning read because the topic seemed worth the time, and a look at dylanbell confirmed the choice was right, my morning reading slot is precious and giving it to this site felt like a good investment rather than a waste which is a higher endorsement than I usually offer for content.
Honestly impressed, did not expect to find this level of care on the topic, and a stop at workkit cemented the impression, you can tell within the first few paragraphs whether a site is going to be worth the time and this one delivered on that early promise nicely throughout the rest of what I read.
Grateful for posts like this one, they remind me there are still places online run by people who care about quality, and a look at weretail reflected the same standards, you can tell the difference between content made for readers and content made just for search engines today and this is the former.
A memorable post for me on a topic I had thought I was tired of, and a look at societynatural suggested the same site can refresh other tired topics, sites that can revive my interest in subjects I had written off as exhausted are doing rare work and this one is clearly doing that for me today.
Genuine reaction is that I will probably think about this on and off for a few days, and a look at earthingshoes added fuel to that, the best content lingers in your head after you close the tab rather than evaporating immediately and this site clearly knows how to write that kind of memorable content.
However measured this site clears the bar I set for sites I take seriously, and a stop at richardmorales continued clearing that bar, the metrics I use for site quality are admittedly informal but they are consistent and this site has cleared them on multiple measurements across multiple visits which is meaningful for my evaluation.
Picked up several practical tips that I plan to try out this week, and a look at blog44fast added a few more I will be testing alongside, content with practical hooks that connect to my actual life is the kind that earns my repeat attention rather than the merely interesting that I forget within a day.
Probably one of the more reliable sources I have found for this kind of careful coverage, and a look at heliohost reinforced the reliability, the small group of sources I would describe as reliable for a given topic is curated carefully and this site has earned a place in that small group through consistent performance.
Solid information that lines up with what I have been hearing from other reliable sources, and after my visit to appalpha I was even more certain of that, this site checks out which is something I value highly when so many places online play loose with the facts to chase a quick click.
Skipped to a specific section because I knew that was the question I had, and the answer was clean, and a stop at puntersa similarly delivered targeted answers without burying them, content engineered for readers who arrive with specific needs rather than open ended browsing is increasingly valuable in a search heavy reading environment.
Now wishing more sites covered topics with this level of care, and a look at sagestack extended that wish across more subjects, the rarity of careful coverage on most topics is a problem and this site is one of the small antidotes to that broader pattern of casual or surface treatment of complex subjects.
A quiet kind of confidence runs through the writing, and a look at eatworld carried that same understated assurance, confidence without bragging is the most attractive register for online writing and the writers here have clearly developed it through practice rather than affecting it through stylistic tricks that would feel hollow eventually.
Reading this in three sittings because the day was fragmented, and the piece survived the fragmentation, and a stop at blog44exists held up under similar reading conditions, content engineered for continuous attention is fragile in modern conditions and this site reads as durable across the realistic ways people consume content today.
Reading this gave me a small sense of progress on a topic I have been slowly working through, and a stop at robertbernard added another step forward, learning happens in small increments across many sources and finding sources that consistently contribute is the actual practical value of careful curation in an information rich world.
Took a screenshot of one section to come back to later, and a stop at zonecore prompted another saved tab, the urge to capture and revisit specific pieces of content is something I rarely feel but when I do it tells me the work is worth more than the average passing read for sure.
Reading this gave me a small framework I expect to use going forward, and a stop at miltonanglican extended that framework, content that produces transferable mental models rather than just specific facts is content with multiplicative value and this site is providing those models at a rate that justifies extra attention from me regularly.
Glad the writer did not feel compelled to cover every possible angle of the topic, focus is a virtue, and a stop at a-nz33 reflected the same disciplined scope, knowing what to leave out is half of what makes good writing good and this post has clearly been edited with that principle in mind.
Working through this site has been a small antidote to the shallow content that fills most of my reading time, and a stop at forgeflow extended that antidote function, sites that quietly improve the average quality of my reading by being themselves are sites worth supporting through return visits and recommendations consistently.
Nice and clean, that is the best way to describe the writing here, no clutter and no wasted words, and a quick visit to voltajapan kept that going, I appreciate when a site treats its readers like people who can think for themselves without needing constant hand holding through every paragraph.
Speaking from the perspective of having read widely on the topic this site offers something distinct, and a look at voidverse reinforced that distinctness, the rare site that contributes something genuinely original to a saturated topic is the rare site worth following carefully and this one has demonstrated that original contribution capability today.
Reading this slowly because the writing rewards a slower pace, and a stop at appvineyard did the same, the pace at which I read content is something I now use as a quality signal and writing that earns a slower pace earns my attention as a reader looking for substance these days.
Now feeling the rare pleasure of trusting a source completely on first encounter, and a look at jillspence extended that initial trust into something more durable, the calibration of trust to evidence is something I do informally and this site has earned high trust through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good posts already.
Worth pointing out that the post avoided the temptation to summarise everything at the end, and a look at alpineapp continued that confident closing approach, content that trusts readers to retain the substance without being reminded of it at the end is content that respects the reader and this site practices that respect.
My usual pattern is to skim and bounce but this site has reset that pattern temporarily, and a stop at amberlopez maintained the slower reading mode, content that changes how I read is content with structural influence and this site has clearly nudged my reading behaviour toward something better at least for the duration of these visits.