Plutón, Venus, Frege y los misterios del lenguaje natural
Pablo de Lora
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Los lenguajes naturales (el que estoy empleando en este momento) adolecen de algunas patologías bien conocidas, aunque no por ello menos desconcertantes cuando se inspeccionan con los anteojos del filósofo.
Tal vez la más célebre sea la vaguedad de los conceptos. Si bien no todos los lógicos estarían de acuerdo, parece natural decir que algo es o no es algo y tertium non datur (esta es la denominada «ley del tercio excluso», una de las leyes más importantes de la lógica de predicados clásica). Los griegos, sin embargo, pronto advirtieron que las cosas no eran tan simples. Es al lógico megárico Eubúlides de Mileto a quien se atribuye el célebre «razonamiento de Sorites», un razonamiento que nos hace concluir que no existen cosas tales como «montones de arena» («sorites» quiere decir montón en griego) o, alternativamente, que un grano de arena constituye un montón de arena, o que, en algunos casos algo no es ni blanco ni negro sino indeterminado (el vulgar «gris» con el que apuntalar nuestra híbrida toma de posición en las discusiones cotidianas). Eubúlides nos pregunta si billones de granos forman un montón de arena, ante lo cual nuestra respuesta será obviamente que sí. Ese mismo montón lo seguirá siendo aunque sustraigamos uno de los granos, y si proseguimos así, granito a granito, llegará un momento en el que un solo grano seguirá siendo un montón (pruebe el lector a proceder a la inversa para concluir que no existen cosas tales como montones de arena). Lo que el razonamiento o paradoja de Sorites muestra es que no es nunca sencillo determinar con nitidez el punto a partir del cual un objeto se convierte en otra cosa, dónde empieza la línea de la gordura, calvicie, altura, etc. En general, los conceptos de los lenguajes naturales son vagos cuando no somos capaces de listar con precisión absoluta todas las condiciones que algo debe reunir para engrosar la denotación del concepto.
En los últimos tiempos, los astrónomos se las han tenido que ver con la engorrosa vaguedad de los lenguajes naturales (ellos tan acostumbrados a la exactitud del lenguaje formalizado por excelencia, la matemática) cuando de definir lo que es un planeta se ha tratado. El resultado, como saben, ha consistido – y permítaseme la ironía- en expulsar a Plutón del planetario. Y ello no sin arduas discusiones semánticas más propias de juristas, seres afanados en determinar con exactitud (¡oh! ilusos) términos tales como «alevosía», que de científicos naturales. Para más inri, la controversia se ha saldado finalmente mediante votación. Algunos malévolos habrán pensado: «curioso método científico éste». En realidad, que Plutón sea o no un planeta no es un asunto científico, sino puramente nominal. ¡Qué más da cómo le cataloguemos! Los nombres comunes son convenciones lingüísticas, y los problemas de vaguedad se resuelven, como no, acudiendo a una precisión dada en un lenguaje no vago como el matemático. Si por definición decimos que un montón de arena debe tener un número X (siendo X un número entre 0 e infinito) de granos, o un objeto tales y cuales dimensiones para ser un planeta, se acabó el problema. La precisión será convencional también, pero nos salva la vida, o, al menos, nos evita estériles discusiones verbales.
Otro ilustre déficit de los lenguajes naturales que les quiero presentar es la ambigüedad, el fenómeno consistente en que un mismo término cuenta con distintos significados («banco», «puro»). En esos casos, es el contexto donde el término aparece el que nos aclarará su significado. ¿Y el fenómeno inverso? ¿Existen términos o proposiciones distintas con el mismo significado? La respuesta es obviamente sí, si pensamos en Venus, un planeta (de momento) al que durante muchos siglos los seres humanos se han referido con dos expresiones diferentes «la estrella matutina» y «la estrella vespertina» pues creían que de dos objetos distintos se trataba. Desde tiempo ha sabemos que son la misma, así que podemos concluir que:
(1)Venus=estrella matutina
(2)Venus=estrella vespertina
(2)Venus=estrella vespertina
Estos enunciados de identidad supusieron un buen quebradero de cabeza para quien pasa por ser el padre de la lógica matemática contemporánea: Gottlob Frege. La razón es, de nuevo, simple y su solución también conocida y harto discutida. De acuerdo con una vieja distinción debida a Kant, las proposiciones (tales como «Venus es la estrella matutina») pueden ser analíticas o sintéticas. La verdad de las primeras es «definicional», se basa en los significados de los términos empleados. Así, para comprobar que «solterón es el varón no casado», no tengo que desarrollar labor empírica alguna, cosa que sí me es exigida en cambio cuando me las veo con una proposición «sintética» tal como «Venus no contiene agua en su superficie». De las dos oraciones anteriores (1) y (2) yo puedo fácilmente concluir (3) Venus=Venus y (4) la estrella matutina= la estrella vespertina. Esas oraciones son equivalentes, pero su carácter no es el mismo. (3) es una proposición analítica, pero (4) no lo es. (3) no me informa de nada y (4) sí. Esta es la razón por la cual Frege (y después Russell), haciéndose eco de una larga tradición que se remonta a Platón, concluye que los nombres propios como «Venus» o «Shakespeare» sólo denotan (carecen de intensión o connotación), pues en otro caso nos veríamos obligados a admitir que existen enunciados de identidad («Venus es Venus» o «Shakespeare es Shakespeare») de naturaleza contingente (y parece que «Venus es Venus» es una verdad necesaria) o proposiciones sintéticas tales como «Venus es la estrella matutina» o «Shakespeare es el autor de Hamlet» de naturaleza necesaria (y parece que en ambos casos tales proposiciones son verdaderas a posteriori, el fruto de la investigación en el mundo).
En «Über Sinn und Bedeutung» («Sobre el sentido y la referencia», su célebre artículo de 1892) Frege nos ha legado además otra forma de concebir las relaciones de identidad que tanto a lógicos como a matemáticos conduce por las calles de la amargura. De acuerdo con el lógico alemán, expresiones tales como «estrella vespertina=estrella matutina» o «2×2=8-4» tienen la misma referencia («Venus», «4») pero distinto significado. ¿Cómo es ello posible? Porque en estos casos hemos de considerar que el mismo objeto (la referencia de las expresiones o su denotación) es presentado de modos diversos. A ese «presentar» a los objetos de distinto modo Frege lo llama «sentido» (Sinn). Corolario: los términos (de los lenguajes naturales o artificiales) expresan su sentido y denotan su referencia y ambas cosas (sentido y referencia) conjuntamente conforman su significado.
Frege fue el máximo inspirador de una corriente filosófica que no ha hecho gran fortuna: el logicisimo. Junto con otros célebres matemáticos (como David Hilbert) anhelaba poder reducir toda la matemática a unos cuantos axiomas lógicos. Para muchos filósofos de otras disciplinas, el espíritu fregeano ha permeado en la forma de un cierto estilo a la hora de afrontar los problemas filosóficos, una actitud que tiene que ver con la inquisición acerca del sentido en el que las palabras son empleadas en el discurso filosófico o vulgar. Muchos pensamos que en numerosas ocasiones la tarea filosófica prioritaria – y para algunas única- es desvelar esos «modos de ser presentados los objetos o ideas», analizar el lenguaje natural con el que nos referimos al mundo y a nosotros mismos, pues la experiencia nos revela que, como en el caso de Venus, no pocos puzzles metafísicos son sólo aparentes; no pocas de las dificultades anunciadas a bombo y platillo no son tales sino «pseudoproblemas» y no pocos de los misterios filosóficos son tan sólo el resultado de haber llenado con hojarasca semántica el patio de nuestros pensamientos.
Coming to this with low expectations and being pleasantly surprised by the substance, and a stop at forwardmotionclarified continued exceeding expectations, the recalibration of expectations upward across multiple positive readings is one of the actual rewards of careful browsing and this site is providing that recalibration at a steady rate apparently.
Found a small mental shift after reading this, the framing here is just a bit different from the standard takes online, and a look at focusdrivenmovement extended that fresh perspective across more material, the rare site whose voice actually changes how you think about something rather than just confirming existing beliefs.
Reading this gave me material for a conversation I needed to have anyway, and a stop at tactrunway added even more talking points, content that connects to upcoming social or professional needs rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind that earns priority placement in my attention these days routinely.
Speaking as someone who reads a lot on this topic this site has earned a high position in my source rankings, and a stop at focusdrivesthepath reinforced that ranking, the informal ranking of sources for a topic is something I maintain mentally and this site has moved into the upper portion of those rankings clearly.
Glad to find a site whose links lead somewhere worth going rather than back to itself for SEO juice, and a stop at ideasgainclarity kept that generous outbound feel, citing other peoples work with real respect rather than just for ranking signals is a sign of an honest operation worth supporting going forward.
This actually answered the question I had been searching for, and after I checked actiondefinespath I had a few more pieces I had not realised I needed, that is the sign of a site that knows what its readers want before they even know how to ask it which is impressive.
Now realising the topic deserved better treatment than it has been getting elsewhere, and a look at progresswithintentionnow extended that broader recognition, content that exposes the gap between actual quality and average quality elsewhere is doing the quiet work of raising standards and this site is contributing to that elevation in its own corner.
A clear cut above the usual noise on the subject, and a look at forwardenergydefined only made that gap wider in my view, the kind of place that earns its visitors through quality rather than through aggressive marketing or sponsored placements which is increasingly the only way most sites stay afloat across the modern web.
Now feeling slightly more committed to my own careful reading practices having read this, and a stop at actionanchorsprogress reinforced that commitment, content that models the kind of attention it deserves is content that calibrates the reader and this site has clearly raised my own bar for what to bring to good writing today.
Reading this prompted me to dig out an old reference book related to the topic, and a stop at growthmoveswithdesign extended that connection to other sources, content that connects me back to my own existing knowledge rather than asking me to forget it is content with continuity and this site has that continuous quality.
Looking for similar voices elsewhere has come up empty in my recent searches, and a stop at riseperk extended the search frustration, the rare site that does what no other does in quite the same way is precious and this one has clearly developed a particular approach that I have not been able to find duplicates of.
Reading this back to back with a similar piece elsewhere made the quality difference obvious, and a stop at growthmovesclearly only widened the gap, comparing content side by side is a useful exercise and the gap between this site and average competitors in the space is large enough to be noticeable from the first paragraph.
Nice to see a post that does not try to overcomplicate the basics for the sake of looking smart, and once I looked at clarityanchorsaction the same direct tone was there too, which honestly makes a difference when you are short on time and want answers without long pointless intros.
Granted my mood today might be elevating my reading experience but I still think this is genuinely good, and a stop at ideasbecomemomentum reinforced that even discounted assessment, controlling for the mood adjustment that affects content perception this site still reads as substantively above average across multiple pieces I have read carefully today.
Honestly enjoyed every minute spent here, that is not something I say lightly, and a look at claritybuildsmomentum confirmed I will be back, the bar for spending time online is high for me these days but this site clears it without effort which is high praise indeed from this reader who is usually rather demanding.
Probably one of the more reliable sources I have found for this kind of careful coverage, and a look at ideasfinddirection reinforced the reliability, the small group of sources I would describe as reliable for a given topic is curated carefully and this site has earned a place in that small group through consistent performance.
Decided to set a calendar reminder to revisit, and a stop at riverunway extended that revisit list, calendar entries for content are a level of commitment I rarely make but when I do they signal a higher regard than a simple bookmark and this site has earned that calendar tier of relationship from me today.
A piece that suggested careful editing without showing the marks of the editing, and a look at actionfeedsforwardmotion continued that invisible polish, the best editing disappears into the prose and this site reads as having been edited with skill that does not announce itself which is the highest compliment I can offer any blog content.
Liked how the post handled an objection I was forming as I read, and a stop at focusamplifiesmotion similarly anticipated where my thinking was going next, the rare writer who can predict reader concerns and address them in advance is doing something most online content fails to do despite that being basic editorial work.
Decided not to skim despite my usual habit and was rewarded for the discipline, and a stop at ideasneedclaritynow earned the same patient approach, training myself to recognise sites that warrant slower reading is part of being a careful online reader and this site is the kind that helps me practice that skill regularly.
Bookmark added with a small note about why, and a look at focusactivatesprogress prompted another bookmark with another note, the bookmarks I annotate are the ones I expect to return to deliberately rather than stumble into and this site is generating annotated bookmarks at a higher rate than my usual content sources by some margin.
Did not expect much when I clicked through but ended up reading the whole thing carefully, and a stop at growthflowscleanly kept that engagement going, sometimes the unassuming sites turn out to deliver more than the flashy ones which is something I have learned to look out for over time online lately and across topics.
Reading this in a moment of low energy still kept my attention, and a stop at claritypowersmovement continued that engagement under suboptimal conditions, content that survives the reader being tired is content with extra reserves of pull and this site has the kind of writing that holds up even when I am not at my reading best.
Pass this along to colleagues if the topic comes up, the framing here is sensible, and a stop at progressbuildsclarity adds more useful angles to share, the kind of content that improves conversations rather than just feeding them is what makes a resource genuinely valuable in professional contexts going forward over time and across project boundaries too.
Reading this slowly to absorb the structure, and the structure is doing real work alongside the words, and a look at progressflowscleanly maintained the same architectural quality, when sentence shapes and paragraph rhythms reinforce the meaning rather than just transporting words you know you are reading skilled work today.
Started reading without much expectation and ended on a high note, and a look at signalclarifiesaction continued that arc, content that builds rather than peaks early is a sign of a writer who knows how to structure a piece for sustained reader engagement rather than relying on a strong hook to do all the work.
Reading this felt productive in a way most internet reading does not, and a look at blog44force continued that productive feeling, sometimes the open web feels like a waste of time but sites like this remind me why I still bother to look around rather than retreating to old reliable sources for everything I need.
Time spent here today felt productive in the way that good reading sessions sometimes do, and a stop at signalbuildsmotion extended that productive feeling across the rest of the morning, the difference between productive reading and merely passing time is real and this site is consistently on the productive side for me lately.
Reading this triggered a small but real correction in something I had assumed, and a stop at growthfollowsdesign extended that corrective effect, content that updates my beliefs through evidence rather than rhetoric is content with intellectual integrity and this site has earned that label consistently across the pieces I have read so far today.
Big thanks to whoever wrote this, you saved me a lot of time hunting for the same info on other sites, and a stop at ideasunlockmotion only added more useful detail without going off topic, that kind of focus is honestly hard to come across these days when most posts wander everywhere.
Honestly this kind of writing is why I still bother to read independent sites, and a look at momentumwithdirection extended that broader reflection, the few sites that justify continued attention to non algorithmic content are sites like this one and finding them periodically is enough to keep my reading habits oriented toward independent rather than aggregated content.
The way the post stayed on topic throughout without going on tangents was really refreshing, and a look at signaldrivesfocus kept that focused approach going, discipline like this in writing is rare and worth recognising because most writers cannot resist wandering off into related subjects that dilute their main point and confuse readers along the way.
Honest assessment is that this is one of the better short reads I have had this week, and a look at clarityremovesfriction reinforced that, the bar for short content is low because most of it sacrifices substance for brevity but this site manages both at once which is harder than it sounds for most writers attempting it.
Found this really helpful, the explanations are simple but they actually answer the questions a normal reader would have, and after I followed progressmoveswithsignal I had a clearer sense of the topic, no extra fluff just useful points laid out in a sensible order that made the time worth it.
Glad I gave this a chance instead of bouncing on the headline, and after momentumneedsfocus I was certain I had made the right call, snap judgements based on titles miss a lot of good content and this is a reminder to slow down and check things out before scrolling past in a hurry.
Honestly this was the highlight of my reading queue today, and a look at actionopenspathways extended that across more pages I will return to, ranking what I read against what else I read each day is something I do informally and this site keeps moving up in those rankings the more I explore it.
Glad to have another data point on a question I am still thinking through, and a look at signalbuildsdirection added two more, content that acknowledges its place in a wider conversation rather than pretending to settle the question alone is intellectually honest in a way that I wish was more common across the open web.
Recommended to anyone working in or curious about this area, the depth and clarity combine well, and a look at clarityanchorsprogress keeps that going across more pages, the kind of site that earns regular visits rather than chasing trends has my respect because it suggests genuine commitment to the topic itself rather than to chasing trends.
Now appreciating that the post left me with enough to say in a follow up conversation, and a look at directioncreatesleverage added more material for those follow ups, content that prepares me for related conversations rather than just informing me alone is content with social utility and this site provides that social armament reliably for me.
Solid post, the structure is easy to follow and the language stays simple even when the topic gets a bit more involved, and a look at claritycreatesenergy kept that same standard going, so I left feeling like the time spent here was actually worth something for once which is rare lately.
Polished and informative without feeling overproduced, that is the sweet spot, and a look at softsummit hit it again, you can tell when a site has been built with care versus thrown together for the sake of having something to put online and this is clearly the former approach taken by the team.
Thanks for the breakdown, it gave me a clearer picture of something I had been confused about for a while now, and a stop at progressdrivenforward closed the remaining gaps in my understanding nicely, no need to hunt around twenty other articles to put the pieces together which is a real time saver.
Genuine reaction is that this site clicked with how I like to read, and a look at actionshapesforwardpath kept that comfortable fit going, sometimes you find a place online whose editorial decisions just align with your preferences and when that happens it is worth recognising and supporting through repeat engagement consistently going forward.
Thanks for the honest framing without exaggerated claims that the topic will change my life, and a stop at ideasunlockprogress kept the same modest tone, restraint in marketing language signals trustworthiness and the writers here are clearly playing the long game by building credibility rather than chasing immediate clicks through hyperbole.
Took a screenshot of one section to come back to later, and a stop at focusanchorsgrowth prompted another saved tab, the urge to capture and revisit specific pieces of content is something I rarely feel but when I do it tells me the work is worth more than the average passing read for sure.
Reading this gave me something to think about for the rest of the afternoon, and after claritycreatesleverage I had even more to mull over, the kind of post that lingers in the background of your day rather than evaporating immediately is genuinely valuable in an attention economy that punishes depth rather than rewarding it.
A thoughtful read in a week that has been mostly noisy, and a look at actiondrivesvelocity carried that thoughtful quality across more pages, finding pockets of considered writing in a week of distractions is one of the small wins of careful curation and this site is providing those pockets at a sustainable rate.
Reading this prompted me to dig out an old reference book related to the topic, and a stop at directionpowersprogress extended that connection to other sources, content that connects me back to my own existing knowledge rather than asking me to forget it is content with continuity and this site has that continuous quality.
Worth observing that the post landed without needing a flashy headline to hook attention, and a stop at growthmoveswithstructure did the same, content that earns engagement through substance rather than packaging is the kind I trust more deeply and this site has clearly chosen substance as the primary lever for reader engagement throughout.
However many similar pages I have read this one taught me something new, and a stop at signalshapesspeed added more new material, content that contributes genuinely fresh information rather than recycling what is already widely available is content with real informational value and this site is providing that informational freshness at a notable rate.