Plutón, Venus, Frege y los misterios del lenguaje natural
Pablo de Lora
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Los lenguajes naturales (el que estoy empleando en este momento) adolecen de algunas patologías bien conocidas, aunque no por ello menos desconcertantes cuando se inspeccionan con los anteojos del filósofo.
Tal vez la más célebre sea la vaguedad de los conceptos. Si bien no todos los lógicos estarían de acuerdo, parece natural decir que algo es o no es algo y tertium non datur (esta es la denominada «ley del tercio excluso», una de las leyes más importantes de la lógica de predicados clásica). Los griegos, sin embargo, pronto advirtieron que las cosas no eran tan simples. Es al lógico megárico Eubúlides de Mileto a quien se atribuye el célebre «razonamiento de Sorites», un razonamiento que nos hace concluir que no existen cosas tales como «montones de arena» («sorites» quiere decir montón en griego) o, alternativamente, que un grano de arena constituye un montón de arena, o que, en algunos casos algo no es ni blanco ni negro sino indeterminado (el vulgar «gris» con el que apuntalar nuestra híbrida toma de posición en las discusiones cotidianas). Eubúlides nos pregunta si billones de granos forman un montón de arena, ante lo cual nuestra respuesta será obviamente que sí. Ese mismo montón lo seguirá siendo aunque sustraigamos uno de los granos, y si proseguimos así, granito a granito, llegará un momento en el que un solo grano seguirá siendo un montón (pruebe el lector a proceder a la inversa para concluir que no existen cosas tales como montones de arena). Lo que el razonamiento o paradoja de Sorites muestra es que no es nunca sencillo determinar con nitidez el punto a partir del cual un objeto se convierte en otra cosa, dónde empieza la línea de la gordura, calvicie, altura, etc. En general, los conceptos de los lenguajes naturales son vagos cuando no somos capaces de listar con precisión absoluta todas las condiciones que algo debe reunir para engrosar la denotación del concepto.
En los últimos tiempos, los astrónomos se las han tenido que ver con la engorrosa vaguedad de los lenguajes naturales (ellos tan acostumbrados a la exactitud del lenguaje formalizado por excelencia, la matemática) cuando de definir lo que es un planeta se ha tratado. El resultado, como saben, ha consistido – y permítaseme la ironía- en expulsar a Plutón del planetario. Y ello no sin arduas discusiones semánticas más propias de juristas, seres afanados en determinar con exactitud (¡oh! ilusos) términos tales como «alevosía», que de científicos naturales. Para más inri, la controversia se ha saldado finalmente mediante votación. Algunos malévolos habrán pensado: «curioso método científico éste». En realidad, que Plutón sea o no un planeta no es un asunto científico, sino puramente nominal. ¡Qué más da cómo le cataloguemos! Los nombres comunes son convenciones lingüísticas, y los problemas de vaguedad se resuelven, como no, acudiendo a una precisión dada en un lenguaje no vago como el matemático. Si por definición decimos que un montón de arena debe tener un número X (siendo X un número entre 0 e infinito) de granos, o un objeto tales y cuales dimensiones para ser un planeta, se acabó el problema. La precisión será convencional también, pero nos salva la vida, o, al menos, nos evita estériles discusiones verbales.
Otro ilustre déficit de los lenguajes naturales que les quiero presentar es la ambigüedad, el fenómeno consistente en que un mismo término cuenta con distintos significados («banco», «puro»). En esos casos, es el contexto donde el término aparece el que nos aclarará su significado. ¿Y el fenómeno inverso? ¿Existen términos o proposiciones distintas con el mismo significado? La respuesta es obviamente sí, si pensamos en Venus, un planeta (de momento) al que durante muchos siglos los seres humanos se han referido con dos expresiones diferentes «la estrella matutina» y «la estrella vespertina» pues creían que de dos objetos distintos se trataba. Desde tiempo ha sabemos que son la misma, así que podemos concluir que:
(1)Venus=estrella matutina
(2)Venus=estrella vespertina
(2)Venus=estrella vespertina
Estos enunciados de identidad supusieron un buen quebradero de cabeza para quien pasa por ser el padre de la lógica matemática contemporánea: Gottlob Frege. La razón es, de nuevo, simple y su solución también conocida y harto discutida. De acuerdo con una vieja distinción debida a Kant, las proposiciones (tales como «Venus es la estrella matutina») pueden ser analíticas o sintéticas. La verdad de las primeras es «definicional», se basa en los significados de los términos empleados. Así, para comprobar que «solterón es el varón no casado», no tengo que desarrollar labor empírica alguna, cosa que sí me es exigida en cambio cuando me las veo con una proposición «sintética» tal como «Venus no contiene agua en su superficie». De las dos oraciones anteriores (1) y (2) yo puedo fácilmente concluir (3) Venus=Venus y (4) la estrella matutina= la estrella vespertina. Esas oraciones son equivalentes, pero su carácter no es el mismo. (3) es una proposición analítica, pero (4) no lo es. (3) no me informa de nada y (4) sí. Esta es la razón por la cual Frege (y después Russell), haciéndose eco de una larga tradición que se remonta a Platón, concluye que los nombres propios como «Venus» o «Shakespeare» sólo denotan (carecen de intensión o connotación), pues en otro caso nos veríamos obligados a admitir que existen enunciados de identidad («Venus es Venus» o «Shakespeare es Shakespeare») de naturaleza contingente (y parece que «Venus es Venus» es una verdad necesaria) o proposiciones sintéticas tales como «Venus es la estrella matutina» o «Shakespeare es el autor de Hamlet» de naturaleza necesaria (y parece que en ambos casos tales proposiciones son verdaderas a posteriori, el fruto de la investigación en el mundo).
En «Über Sinn und Bedeutung» («Sobre el sentido y la referencia», su célebre artículo de 1892) Frege nos ha legado además otra forma de concebir las relaciones de identidad que tanto a lógicos como a matemáticos conduce por las calles de la amargura. De acuerdo con el lógico alemán, expresiones tales como «estrella vespertina=estrella matutina» o «2×2=8-4» tienen la misma referencia («Venus», «4») pero distinto significado. ¿Cómo es ello posible? Porque en estos casos hemos de considerar que el mismo objeto (la referencia de las expresiones o su denotación) es presentado de modos diversos. A ese «presentar» a los objetos de distinto modo Frege lo llama «sentido» (Sinn). Corolario: los términos (de los lenguajes naturales o artificiales) expresan su sentido y denotan su referencia y ambas cosas (sentido y referencia) conjuntamente conforman su significado.
Frege fue el máximo inspirador de una corriente filosófica que no ha hecho gran fortuna: el logicisimo. Junto con otros célebres matemáticos (como David Hilbert) anhelaba poder reducir toda la matemática a unos cuantos axiomas lógicos. Para muchos filósofos de otras disciplinas, el espíritu fregeano ha permeado en la forma de un cierto estilo a la hora de afrontar los problemas filosóficos, una actitud que tiene que ver con la inquisición acerca del sentido en el que las palabras son empleadas en el discurso filosófico o vulgar. Muchos pensamos que en numerosas ocasiones la tarea filosófica prioritaria – y para algunas única- es desvelar esos «modos de ser presentados los objetos o ideas», analizar el lenguaje natural con el que nos referimos al mundo y a nosotros mismos, pues la experiencia nos revela que, como en el caso de Venus, no pocos puzzles metafísicos son sólo aparentes; no pocas de las dificultades anunciadas a bombo y platillo no son tales sino «pseudoproblemas» y no pocos de los misterios filosóficos son tan sólo el resultado de haber llenado con hojarasca semántica el patio de nuestros pensamientos.
Thanks for the readable length, I finished it without checking how much was left, and a stop at ideasflowintoaction kept me reading the same way, when I stop noticing the length of a piece because the content is engaging enough to sustain attention without willpower the writer has done their job well today.
Now wishing I had found this site sooner, and a look at signalcreatesdirection extended that mild regret, the calculation of how many years of good content I missed by not finding the right sources earlier is one I try not to make too often but it does come up sometimes when I find sites this good.
This actually answered the question I had been searching for, and after I checked claritydrivesforward I had a few more pieces I had not realised I needed, that is the sign of a site that knows what its readers want before they even know how to ask it which is impressive.
The examples really helped me grasp the points faster than abstract descriptions would have, and a stop at focusshapesmotion added a few more practical illustrations that drove the message home, the kind of writing that knows its readers learn better through concrete situations rather than vague generalities is rare and worth recognising clearly.
Worth a slow read rather than the fast scan I usually default to, and a look at forwardpathenergized earned the same slower pace from me, content that resets my reading speed downward is content with substance worth absorbing and this site has produced that effect on me multiple times now over the last week here.
Worth saying this site reads better than most paid newsletters I have tried, and a stop at a-nz42 confirmed that comparison, the bar for free content is often lower than for paid but this site clears the paid bar consistently and that says something about the editorial approach behind the work being published here regularly.
Now feeling confident enough in this site to use it as a reference point for evaluating others on the same topic, and a look at claritypowersmotion continued the comparison friendly quality, sites that serve as quality benchmarks for their topic are precious and this one has clearly become a benchmark for me on this particular subject area.
Liked how the post handled an objection I was forming as I read, and a stop at progresswithclaritynow similarly anticipated where my thinking was going next, the rare writer who can predict reader concerns and address them in advance is doing something most online content fails to do despite that being basic editorial work.
Definitely a recommend from me, anyone curious about the topic should check this out, and a look at focusfeedsgrowth adds even more reason for that, the depth and quality combine to make this site one I will be pointing people toward whenever similar conversations come up over the months ahead at work or socially.
A thoughtful read in a week that has been mostly noisy, and a look at signalcreatesdirectionalflow carried that thoughtful quality across more pages, finding pockets of considered writing in a week of distractions is one of the small wins of careful curation and this site is providing those pockets at a sustainable rate.
Now understanding why someone recommended this site to me a while back, and a stop at ideasneedprecision explained the recommendation, sometimes recommendations make sense only after experience and this site has finally clicked into place as the kind of resource I now understand was being recommended for sound editorial reasons by my friend.
Now feeling the rare pleasure of trusting a source completely on first encounter, and a look at clarityfollowsfocus extended that initial trust into something more durable, the calibration of trust to evidence is something I do informally and this site has earned high trust through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good posts already.
Honest assessment is that this is one of the better short reads I have had this week, and a look at forwardtractionbuilt reinforced that, the bar for short content is low because most of it sacrifices substance for brevity but this site manages both at once which is harder than it sounds for most writers attempting it.
Honest reaction is that this is the kind of writing I would defend in a conversation about good blog content, and a look at ideasflowstrategically reinforced that, the rare site whose work I would actively recommend rather than just tolerate is the kind I want to support through return visits regularly.
Looking for similar voices elsewhere has come up empty in my recent searches, and a stop at growthmoveswithclarity extended the search frustration, the rare site that does what no other does in quite the same way is precious and this one has clearly developed a particular approach that I have not been able to find duplicates of.
Now planning to share the link with a small group of readers I trust, and a look at claritydrivesmovement suggested more material to share with the same group, recommending content into a curated circle requires confidence in the recommendation and this site is making me confident in those personal recommendations on multiple separate occasions now.
Looking at this objectively the editorial quality is hard to deny even setting aside personal taste, and a stop at claritydrivesaction maintained the same objective quality, the gap between what I personally enjoy and what is objectively well crafted exists and this site clears both bars simultaneously which is rarer than it sounds.
Comfortable reading experience throughout, no jarring tone shifts and no awkward formatting, and a look at focuspowersdirection kept that smooth feel going, the kind of editorial polish that goes unnoticed when present but glaring when absent is something this site has clearly invested in across the broader content as well which deserves recognition.
On reflection this is the kind of writing that improves my taste for what is possible in the format, and a look at signalcreatesflow continued raising that bar, content that elevates my expectations rather than lowering them is doing important work in calibrating my standards and this site is participating in that elevation reliably.
Sets a higher bar than most of what shows up in search results for this topic, and a look at growthfollowsdirection did not lower that bar at all, in fact it confirmed the impression, this is the kind of consistency that earns a place in regular rotation for serious readers instead of casual scrollers passing through.
Generally I find the content on similar topics frustrating in specific ways and this post avoided all of them, and a look at clarityfuelsmomentum continued that frustration free experience, content that sidesteps the standard failure modes of its genre is content with editorial awareness and this site has clearly studied what fails elsewhere consistently.
A particular pleasure to read this with a fresh coffee, and a look at focusunlocksprogress extended the pleasure across more pages, content that pairs well with quiet morning rituals is something I have come to value highly and this site has the kind of energy that fits naturally into a calm reading routine.
Such writing is increasingly rare and worth supporting through attention, and a stop at progressmovesbyclarity extended that supportive attention across more pages, the conscious choice to spend time on sites that produce careful work rather than convenient consumption is itself a small form of patronage and this site is receiving that conscious patronage from me.
Reading this confirmed something I had been suspecting about the topic, and a look at actionsetsdirection pushed that confirmation toward greater confidence, content that lines up with independently held intuitions earns a special kind of trust and I will return to writers who consistently land that way for me without overselling positions.
Worth saying that the prose reads naturally without straining for style, and a stop at ideasunlockvelocity maintained the same unforced quality, writing that achieves elegance without effort is the highest tier and this site has clearly worked out how to land that effortless quality consistently rather than only on the writers best days.
Glad to find something on this topic that does not start with three paragraphs of throat clearing before getting to the point, and a stop at forwardmovementlogic also dives right in, respect for the readers time shows up in small editorial choices like this and they add up to a real difference quickly.
Worth pointing out that the writing reads as confident without being defensive about it, and a look at directionguidesmotion extended that secure tone, content that does not pre emptively argue against imagined critics has a different quality from defensive writing and this site reads as written from a place of real ease.
Now feeling the post has earned a proper recommendation rather than a casual mention, and a stop at directionguidesenergy reinforced the recommendation strength, the difference between mentioning and recommending is a small editorial distinction I observe in my own conversations and this site has earned the upgraded recommendation level from me confidently today.
Picked this up while looking for something else and ended up reading every paragraph because it was actually informative, and after ideasfuelmovement I was sure I would come back, that does not happen often when most sites bury the useful parts under endless ads and pop ups today and across most categories online.
Well done, the writing is professional without being stiff, and the topic is treated with care, and a look at ideasrequireclarity reflected that approach, the kind of site I would point a colleague to if they asked for a reliable starting point on this topic in the future without any hesitation at all.
Thanks for putting in the work to make this approachable, plenty of sites cover the same ground but most do it badly, and a quick visit to signalunlocksprogress confirmed this one stands apart, simple language and useful examples without anyone trying to sell me anything along the way which I really appreciated.
Speaking as someone who reads a lot on this topic this site has earned a high position in my source rankings, and a stop at directionchannelsgrowth reinforced that ranking, the informal ranking of sources for a topic is something I maintain mentally and this site has moved into the upper portion of those rankings clearly.
Thanks for the honest framing without exaggerated claims that the topic will change my life, and a stop at forwardmotiondefined kept the same modest tone, restraint in marketing language signals trustworthiness and the writers here are clearly playing the long game by building credibility rather than chasing immediate clicks through hyperbole.
Found this really helpful, the explanations are simple but they actually answer the questions a normal reader would have, and after I followed growthflowsintentionally I had a clearer sense of the topic, no extra fluff just useful points laid out in a sensible order that made the time worth it.
During a quiet evening reading session this provided just the right depth without being heavy, and a stop at actioncreatesdirectionalflow maintained the same evening appropriate weight, content with depth that does not exhaust the reader is content with editorial calibration and this site has clearly figured out how to be substantial without being demanding all the time.
If I were to recommend a starting point for the topic this site would be near the top of my list, and a stop at focusmechanism reinforced that recommendation status, the small list of starting point recommendations I keep for friends asking about topics is short and this site is now firmly on it.
I usually skim posts like these but this one held my attention all the way through, and a stop at claritysequence did the same, that is a strong endorsement coming from me because I am usually quick to bounce when content gets repetitive or fails to deliver on its initial promise made in the headline.
Walked away with a clearer head than I had before reading this, and a quick visit to claritybridge only sharpened that, the writing has a way of cutting through the noise that surrounds most topics online which is something I will definitely remember the next time I am searching for an answer to anything.
The way the post stayed on topic throughout without going on tangents was really refreshing, and a look at visionbuilder kept that focused approach going, discipline like this in writing is rare and worth recognising because most writers cannot resist wandering off into related subjects that dilute their main point and confuse readers along the way.
Decided this was the kind of site I would defend in a discussion about good blog content, and a stop at actionoriented reinforced that, very few sites earn active defence rather than passive consumption and this one has clearly crossed that threshold for me without needing any explicit pitch from the writers themselves either.
Felt no urge to argue with the conclusions even though I started the post slightly skeptical, and a look at focuscreatesresults maintained that pattern, writing that earns agreement through clarity of argument rather than rhetorical pressure is the kind I find most persuasive and the kind I want to read more of these days.
In the middle of an otherwise scattered day this post landed as a moment of focus, and a stop at ideaflowpath extended that focused feeling across more pages, content that anchors a fragmented day rather than contributing to the fragmentation is content with real centring effect and this site is providing that anchoring function for me.
Thank you for being clear and direct, that simple approach saves so much frustration on the reader’s end, and a stop at ideasintofocusedaction only made me more sure of it, the rest of the content seems to follow the same pattern which is a great sign of consistent editorial care behind the scenes.
Now appreciating that the post left me with enough to say in a follow up conversation, and a look at growthdrivenalliance added more material for those follow ups, content that prepares me for related conversations rather than just informing me alone is content with social utility and this site provides that social armament reliably for me.
Liked everything about the experience, from the opening through to the closing notes, and a stop at directioncraft extended that into more pages, finding a site where the editorial vision shows through every choice rather than feeling random is an increasingly rare experience and one I am glad to have today during this particular reading session.
Now appreciating that the post did not require me to agree with the writer to find it valuable, and a look at ideasbecomemovement maintained the same useful regardless of agreement quality, content that informs even when it does not convince is content with broader utility and this site reads as useful even when I disagree.
Pass this along to anyone you know dealing with similar questions, the answers here are clear, and a stop at strategycraft adds even more useful material, this is the kind of resource that deserves to circulate widely rather than getting lost in the constant churn of new content online that buries good work daily.
Speaking from the perspective of having read widely on the topic this site offers something distinct, and a look at growthchannel reinforced that distinctness, the rare site that contributes something genuinely original to a saturated topic is the rare site worth following carefully and this one has demonstrated that original contribution capability today.
Found this useful, the points line up well with what I have been thinking about lately, and a stop at bondedintegrity added some angles I had not considered yet, definitely walking away with more than I came for which is the best outcome from time spent reading online for any kind of topic.
Now appreciating that the post left me with enough to say in a follow up conversation, and a look at everlastingbond added more material for those follow ups, content that prepares me for related conversations rather than just informing me alone is content with social utility and this site provides that social armament reliably for me.