Los materiales nanoestructurados en nuestra vida diaria. Entrevista a Rosa Menéndez.
Entrevista realizada por Lorena Cabeza (DIVULGA) para Profes.net
Rosa Menéndez nació en Corollos, Asturias, en 1956. Tras graduarse en Química y doctorarse en esta misma disciplina por la Universidad de Oviedo en 1986, pudo llevar a cabo varias estancias postdoctorales en Inglaterra y Estados Unidos. En 1989 se incorpora al Instituto Nacional del Carbón del CSIC, donde actualmente lleva a cabo su trabajo como profesora de investigación. Entre los años 2003 y 2008 ha sido directora de este instituto, y entre 2008 y 2009 ostentó el cargo de vicepresidenta de Investigación Científica y Técnica del CSIC. Es autora de más de 160 artículos en revistas científicas de impacto y ha dirigido 16 tesis doctorales. Su investigación se centra en la química de los materiales y la energía, y en concreto en la mejora de los procesos de conversión del carbón y la puesta en valor de sus derivados y los del petróleo. También dirige una línea de investigación sobre la síntesis química del grafeno, un material que puede revolucionar nuestras vidas en un futuro cercano.
¿Qué trabajo lleva a cabo en el INCAR?
R.- Desde comienzos de los años 90 venimos desarrollando materiales de carbono de características muy distintas, como fibras de carbono, materiales compuestos, carbones activados y en los últimos años materiales grafénicos. Partiendo de derivados del carbón y del petróleo, preparamos precursores específicos para cada tipo de material. Y el material, a su vez, viene condicionado por la aplicación para la que está previsto. Nuestros materiales encuentran aplicación en el sector aeronáutico, con materiales compuestos; el almacenamiento de energía, con carbones activados y grafenos; la catálisis, con carbones activados y grafenos; y el medio ambiente, con carbones activados y grafenos para la eliminación de contaminantes en vertidos industriales.
¿Qué son los materiales nanoestructurados? ¿Cuál es su ventaja respecto a otros materiales convencionales?
R.- Desde que se comenzó a trabajar en nanotecnología, en la década de los 80, se han tratado de desarrollar nuevos métodos de producción de materiales constituidos por cristales de un tamaño inferior a los 100 nanómetros, los llamados materiales nanoestructurados. Cuando se reduce el tamaño de los materiales al rango nanométrico, se inducen diferencias en sus propiedades físicas. También los procesos superficiales se ven fuertemente alterados. Por ello, un control preciso de las dimensiones de los materiales en el rango de los nanómetros nos permite variar sus propiedades. Esto abre la puerta al diseño de materiales para mercados muy diversos como las aplicaciones biomédicas, ópticas, en energía, etc.
¿Están presentes los materiales nanoestructurados en nuestra vida diaria?
R.- Lo están desde hace años. Por ejemplo, los ordenadores han experimentado desde los años 90 mejoras muy importantes debido precisamente al uso de materiales nanoestructurados. Los paneles solares fabricados con nanomateriales también permiten minimizar el empleo de bloques de silicio. Otros materiales comunes que contienen nanopartículas son las cremas solares, donde se emplean para absorber la radiación UV, además de para facilitar su incorporación a la piel. También se emplean nanopartículas de plata como agentes biocidas para minimizar el riesgo de contraer infecciones. Los nanomateriales también están presentes en el deporte: bicicletas con nanotubos de carbono, raquetas de tenis reforzadas con estos nanotubos, etc. Y todavía son muchas más las aplicaciones que se esperan en los próximos años: leds fabricados a partir de puntos cuánticos mucho más baratos que los actuales, materiales capaces de introducirse en nuestro cuerpo y atacar selectivamente células cancerígenas, etc.
¿Son estos materiales seguros?
R.- La mayoría de los nanomateriales no son más peligrosos que sus equivalentes “macro”. Por ejemplo, los materiales en forma de películas delgadas que conforman las memorias de los ordenadores no son más dañinas por el hecho de ser nano. En general, debemos distinguir dos casos: uno, los nanomateriales adheridos a otros materiales, que no resultan más peligrosas que las micropartículas correspondientes (depende solo de su naturaleza: el arsénico es igual de tóxico nanoestructurado o no); y dos, nanopartículas dispersas en el aire, que pueden resultar más peligrosas al ser inhaladas.
¿Cuáles son los materiales avanzados más prometedores en los que se está investigando?
R.- El mundo de los materiales es muy amplio, pero todo lo relacionado con nanomateriales, láminas delgadas y materiales inteligentes está dentro de lo más prometedor. En concreto, existen grandes expectativas en relación con los materiales grafénicos por su gran potencial para aplicaciones que van desde el campo de las comunicaciones y microelectrónica a otros ámbitos como la química fina y la energía, en producción y almacenamiento. Se trata de un material con unas propiedades electrónicas únicas, además de una especial resistencia y flexibilidad.
¿Qué características son las que hacen del grafeno un material tan especial?
R.- El grafeno, formado por una capa de átomos de carbono, es a la vez metálico, flexible y transparente. Es resistente, sus constantes elásticas son las más altas que se han medido en un material, y admite tensiones muy elevadas sin romperse. Es además muy impermeable, ya que no permite el paso de átomos y moléculas a pesar de su pequeño espesor. Desde el punto de vista químico es un material inerte.
¿En qué aplicaciones concretas se espera que se use?
R.- El hecho de presentar unas excelentes propiedades mecánicas, térmicas, eléctricas y ópticas, le convierte en candidato para un gran número de aplicaciones en áreas tan diversas como la nanoelectrónica, los sensores moleculares, las telecomunicaciones, los componentes mecánicos, en forma de material compuesto, almacenamiento de energía y salud, por ejemplo, en la liberación controlada de fármacos.
¿En qué fase se encuentra la investigación sobre grafenos?
R.- La investigación sobre grafenos avanza de forma rápida, a pasos agigantados científicamente hablando. En estos momentos el objetivo es buscar procesos que permitan su obtención en grandes cantidades, de forma competitiva desde el punto de vista económico y energético, y respetando el medio ambiente. Las expectativas superan con creces a las planteadas por los fullerenos y nanotubos de carbono en su día, y parecen estar más próximas a su materialización. Tienen la ventaja de la variedad y simplicidad de los procesos y de la variedad en la calidad de los materiales, con lo que pueden ser utilizados en aplicaciones muy diversas. Para la utilización masiva de los grafenos todavía queda mucho camino por recorrer y mucha investigación por realizar.
¿Cómo se obtiene el grafeno?
R.- Se utilizan fundamentalmente dos vías para su síntesis, a partir del grafito o materiales grafíticos: mediante la separación de las láminas de grafeno individuales mecánicamente o por vía química -lo que se denomina método top-down-, y mediante síntesis química o depósito en fase de vapor a partir de moléculas más pequeñas –el método bottom-up-. La primera incluye también la obtención de grafenos mediante apertura de nanotubos. Cada una de ellas dispone de un amplio abanico de precursores y condiciones de proceso que enriquecen o dificultan, según se mire, la consecución del material final. En nuestro grupo los estamos preparando por vía química, utilizando distintos grafitos de partida y aplicando distintos procedimientos de reducción, y también por apertura de nanofibras y nanotubos, y mediante exfoliación mecánica del grafito.
Y, ¿qué hay de los fullerenos?
R.- Los fullerenos han marcado un hito desde el punto de vista científico. Se mostró al mundo una nueva forma de carbono que nadie hubiese imaginado. Supusieron un salto cualitativo en la ciencia del carbono, hasta entonces basada en las dos formas alotrópicas conocidas por todos, el grafito y el diamante. Se ha trabajado intensamente en la búsqueda de aplicaciones para este material en campos como la biomedicina o la energía, pero en mi opinión no se han consolidado y siguen siendo materia de investigación después de más de veinte años. También es relevante el que abrieran el camino al descubrimiento de los nanotubos de carbono, que sí se están produciendo a escala industrial y están ampliando considerablemente su rango de aplicaciones.
Now feeling the small relief of finding writing that does not condescend, and a stop at directionalmap extended that respect for readers, content that treats its audience as capable adults rather than as people to be managed produces a different reading experience and this site has clearly chosen the respectful approach across all pieces.
Granted I am giving this site more credit than I usually give new finds, and a look at momentumstructure continued earning that credit, the calibration of how much trust to extend after limited exposure is something I do carefully and this site has earned more trust on shorter exposure than most due to consistent quality across.
Reading this triggered a small but real correction in something I had assumed, and a stop at focusbuildsvelocity extended that corrective effect, content that updates my beliefs through evidence rather than rhetoric is content with intellectual integrity and this site has earned that label consistently across the pieces I have read so far today.
Such writing is increasingly rare and worth supporting through attention, and a stop at actiondirection extended that supportive attention across more pages, the conscious choice to spend time on sites that produce careful work rather than convenient consumption is itself a small form of patronage and this site is receiving that conscious patronage from me.
This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at strategyhub kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.
Found the rhythm of the prose particularly enjoyable on this read through, and a look at trustedalliancenet kept that musical quality going across the related pages, sentence rhythm is something most blog writers ignore but it makes a real difference in how content lands with the careful reader who cares.
Well done, the kind of post that makes you slow down and actually read instead of skimming for keywords, and a look at ideamapper kept me reading carefully too, that is a sign of writing that has been crafted rather than churned out for an algorithm to see today and tomorrow.
Speaking from the perspective of a fairly demanding reader the writing here clears the bar consistently, and a look at strategyprogression continued clearing that bar, the calibration of demanding reader is something I apply to all sources and this site has been one of the few that handles the demanding reading well across pieces sampled.
Reading this prompted me to dig out an old reference book related to the topic, and a stop at longtermvaluebond extended that connection to other sources, content that connects me back to my own existing knowledge rather than asking me to forget it is content with continuity and this site has that continuous quality.
Reading this prompted a small redirection in something I was working on, and a stop at actiondrivenprogress extended that redirecting influence, content that affects my actual work rather than just my thinking has the highest practical impact and this site is providing that level of influence for me at a sustainable rate apparently.
After reading several posts back to back the consistent voice across them is impressive, and a stop at bondedcapitalpartners continued that voice consistency, sites that maintain a single coherent voice across many pieces by potentially many writers represent serious editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed the institutional consistency needed for that.
Appreciate the practical examples, they made the abstract points easier to grasp, and a stop at forwardmotionengine added more of the same, this site clearly understands that real examples beat empty theory every single time which is the mark of a writer who knows their audience well and respects their time.
The way the post stayed on topic throughout without going on tangents was really refreshing, and a look at bondedstrength kept that focused approach going, discipline like this in writing is rare and worth recognising because most writers cannot resist wandering off into related subjects that dilute their main point and confuse readers along the way.
Compared to the usual results for this kind of search this site stands well above the average, and a quick visit to strategicconnectionbond kept the standard high, you can tell within seconds whether a site is going to waste your time or actually deliver and this one clearly delivers without any false starts.
Skipped the comments section but might come back to read it, and a stop at progressblueprint hinted at a quality reader community, sites where the comments are worth reading separately from the post are increasingly rare and signal a particular kind of audience that has grown around the editorial vision over time gradually.
Reading more of the archives is now on my plan for the weekend, and a stop at signalactivatesgrowth confirmed the archive worth the time, the rare archive worth a dedicated reading session rather than just casual sampling is the rare archive of serious work and this site has clearly produced enough of that work to warrant the deeper exploration.
Glad I gave this a chance instead of bouncing on the headline, and after signalfeedsmomentum I was certain I had made the right call, snap judgements based on titles miss a lot of good content and this is a reminder to slow down and check things out before scrolling past in a hurry.
Came here from a search and stayed for the side links because they were that interesting, and a stop at directionalintelligence took me even further into the site, the kind of organic exploration that good content invites is something most sites kill through aggressive interlinking and pushy navigation choices rather than relying on quality.
Found this through a search that was generic enough I did not expect quality results, and a look at actionpathfinder continued the surprisingly good experience, search engines occasionally still surface excellent independent content if you scroll past the obvious paid and high authority results which is reassuring to remember sometimes.
Quality writing that respects the reader’s intelligence without overloading them, and a quick look at longtermtrustnetwork reflected that approach, a balanced thoughtful site that earns trust by being consistent rather than by shouting about how trustworthy it is which is the usual approach online sadly across most content categories.
Really appreciate the absence of stock photos that have nothing to do with the content, and a quick visit to growthflowswithclarity maintained the same restraint, visual filler is a tell that the writing cannot stand on its own and the lack of it here suggests the team has confidence in their content quality alone.
Really appreciate the absence of stock photos that have nothing to do with the content, and a quick visit to directionchannelsprogress maintained the same restraint, visual filler is a tell that the writing cannot stand on its own and the lack of it here suggests the team has confidence in their content quality alone.
Without overstating it this is a quietly excellent post, and a look at claritybuilderhub extended that quiet excellence, content that earns superlatives without demanding them through marketing language is content that has truly earned them through the substance and this site has clearly produced work in that earned excellence category today.
Thanks for the practical examples scattered through the post rather than abstract theory only, and a look at directionalprocess continued that grounded style, abstract points are easier to remember when paired with concrete situations and the writers here clearly understand how readers actually retain information from blog content reading sessions.
Excellent execution from start to finish, the post never loses its rhythm and the points stay sharp, and a quick stop at focusbuildsresults kept the same level going, consistency like this across a site is the marker of a serious operation rather than a casual side project running on autopilot somewhere else.
Really appreciate the absence of stock photos that have nothing to do with the content, and a quick visit to actionmomentum maintained the same restraint, visual filler is a tell that the writing cannot stand on its own and the lack of it here suggests the team has confidence in their content quality alone.
Nice and clean, that is the best way to describe the writing here, no clutter and no wasted words, and a quick visit to actionconstructor kept that going, I appreciate when a site treats its readers like people who can think for themselves without needing constant hand holding through every paragraph.
Speaking carefully because I do not want to overstate things this site is genuinely above average across multiple measurements, and a stop at growthmoveswithstructure continued the above average performance, the calibration of judgement against potential overstatement is something I take seriously and this site clears the higher bar even after that calibration applies.
Reading this prompted me to subscribe to my first newsletter in months, and a stop at unitytrustbond confirmed the subscribe was the right call, content that earns a newsletter signup is content that has cleared a higher trust bar than a casual visit and this site has clearly earned that level of commitment from me.
Top quality material, deserves more attention than it probably gets, and a look at focusguidesmovement reflected the same effort across the site, a hidden gem in the modern web where most attention goes to whoever shouts loudest rather than whoever actually delivers the best content for their readers without much marketing fanfare.
Following a few of the internal links revealed more posts of similar quality, and a stop at bondedstability added more to that growing pile, sites where internal links lead to more good content rather than to more of the same recycled material are sites with depth and this one has clearly built that depth carefully.
Probably one of the more reliable sources I have found for this kind of careful coverage, and a look at actioncreatesforwardpath reinforced the reliability, the small group of sources I would describe as reliable for a given topic is curated carefully and this site has earned a place in that small group through consistent performance.
Comfortable read, finished it without realising how much time had passed, and a look at collaborativepowergroup pulled me into more pages the same way, the absence of friction in good content lets time disappear and that is one of the highest compliments I can pay any piece of writing I find online during a regular search session.
Reading this fit naturally into my afternoon walk because I was reading on my phone, and a stop at businessbondcircle continued well in that walking format, content that survives mobile reading without becoming awkward is content with format flexibility and this site has clearly thought about how it reads across different devices today.
Worth saying this site reads better than most paid newsletters I have tried, and a stop at momentumplanning confirmed that comparison, the bar for free content is often lower than for paid but this site clears the paid bar consistently and that says something about the editorial approach behind the work being published here regularly.
Worth pointing out that the post avoided the temptation to summarise everything at the end, and a look at claritysystems continued that confident closing approach, content that trusts readers to retain the substance without being reminded of it at the end is content that respects the reader and this site practices that respect.
Now wondering how the writers calibrated the level of detail so well, and a stop at strongalliancelink continued the same calibration, the right level of detail is one of the harder editorial calls in any piece and this site has clearly developed an instinct for it through what I assume is years of careful practice publicly.
Liked the post enough to read it twice and the second read found new things, and a stop at actionmovesstrategy similarly rewarded the second look, content with hidden depths that only reveal themselves on careful rereading is the rare kind that earns lasting respect rather than fleeting first impressions only briefly held.
Picked this up between two other things I was doing and got drawn in completely, and after growtharchitect my original tasks were completely forgotten for a while, content that derails a workflow in a positive way by being more interesting than what you were already doing is rare and worth recognising clearly.
Nice and clean, that is the best way to describe the writing here, no clutter and no wasted words, and a quick visit to momentumactivation kept that going, I appreciate when a site treats its readers like people who can think for themselves without needing constant hand holding through every paragraph.
Did not expect much when I clicked through but ended up reading the whole thing carefully, and a stop at businessunitynetwork kept that engagement going, sometimes the unassuming sites turn out to deliver more than the flashy ones which is something I have learned to look out for over time online lately and across topics.
Adding this to my list of go to references for the topic, and a stop at actioncreatespathways confirmed the rest of the site deserves the same, definitely the kind of resource that earns its place rather than getting forgotten the moment the next interesting article shows up in my feed somewhere else on the web.
Came away with some new perspectives I had not considered before, and after progressflowswithclarity those ideas felt more complete, the kind of content that stays with you a little while after reading rather than slipping out the moment you switch tabs and move on with your day to whatever comes next.
Came across this through a roundabout path and now it is on my regular rotation, and a stop at forwardpathway sealed that decision, the open web still produces serendipitous discoveries when you let the citations and references guide you rather than relying purely on algorithmic feeds for new content recommendations always.
Beats most of the alternatives on the topic by a noticeable margin, and a look at claritymotionlab did not change that at all, this is one of the better corners of the open internet for this kind of content and I am glad I clicked through rather than skipping past quickly like I usually do.
Skipped the comments to avoid spoilers and came back later to find them genuinely worth reading, and a stop at claritycreatesprogress extended that surprised respect, when the discussion below a post matches the quality of the post itself you have found something special and this site appears to attract that kind of audience.
The pacing of the post was just right, never rushed and never dragged out unnecessarily, and a look at signalshapesprogress maintained the same rhythm, you can tell the writer has experience because the difficult skill of pacing is something only practiced writers manage to handle well in long form content over time and across formats.
Now considering writing a longer note about the post somewhere, and a look at claritylane added more material for that note, content that prompts me to write rather than just consume is content with generative energy and this site is producing that generative effect for me at a higher rate than most sources.
Now sitting back and recognising that this was a small but real win in my reading day, and a stop at truebondnetwork extended that quiet win, the cumulative effect of small reading wins versus the cumulative effect of small reading losses is real over time and this site is contributing to the wins side of that ledger.
Looking through the archives suggests this site has been doing this for a while at this level, and a look at signalcreatesdirectionalflow confirmed the long term consistency, sites that have maintained quality across years rather than just a recent stretch are sites with serious editorial discipline and this one has clearly been at it for a while.