Otra vez los índices de impacto y su significado

En este blog he insistido en el hecho de que ya no se evalúa la ciencia por lo que se publica, si no dónde se publica y nos limitamos a «sumar» o «promediar» índices de impacto (Impact Factor, IF) de las revistas en las que se publica en vez de valorar el artículo individualmente. También he insistido en que los IFs se usan «alegremente», muchas veces sin conocer su significado real.

Hoy traigo a esta página un ejemplo espectacular que nos tiene que hacer reflexionar sobre el valor que puede tener el IF de las publicaciones científicas.

Se acaba de publicar el IF correspondiente a los artículos publicados en 2008. Y hay un cambio espectacular. La revista Acta Crystallographica Section A (Foundations of Crystallography) ha aumentado su IF en casi 25 veces, pasado de un digno 2’05  a un espectacular 49’93. ¿Por qué ha sido esto? ¿Ha aumentado la calidad de los artículos publicado? ¿Ha aumentado la exigencia del editor?

NO. La razón es que se ha publicado un artículo excelente y que toda la comunidad cristalográfica llevaba años esperando: A short history of SHELX por George M. Sheldrick, el «inventor» del programa SHELX, que es la herramienta computacional fundamental para refinar estructuras cristalográficas. Este artículo ha sido citado 6653 veces (a 25 de junio de 2010), con casi 6000 citas entre 2008 y 2009.

El segundo artículo más citado de Acta Crystallographica Section A ha sido citado 31 veces, el 10º más citado, 11 veces; hay 17 artículos que han sido citado 2 o una vez y hay 19 artículos que no han sido citados (de un total de 72 artículos publicados en 2008).

Como ya he pedido en este blog, leamos las publicaciones y veamos cuanto se ha citado cada artículo individualmente; especialmente, cuando tengamo que evaluar CVs para plazas, contratos, etc. Si seguimos teniendo en cuenta solo el índice de impacto de las revista, cometeremos injusticias. Si no cambiamos el sistema, solo me queda felicitar a los que hayan publicado en 2008 en Acta Crystallographica Section A, pues tendrán artículos con un IF de casi 50, aunque nunca haya sido citado.

P. D.: Por cierto, os habréis fijado que, sin cambiar prácticamente, la revista ha pasado de ser casi despreciada por los que solo publican por índice de impacto a ser una revista «excelente».

Bernardo Herradón

IQOG-CSIC

herradon@iqog.csic.es

Compartir:

734 comentarios

  1. Found something quietly useful here that I expect to return to, and a stop at securepathbond added more of the same, content with quiet utility ages well in a way that flashy hot takes do not and I have learned to weight quiet utility much higher when deciding what to bookmark for later use.

  2. Honestly impressed, did not expect to find this level of care on the topic, and a stop at actioncreatesvelocity cemented the impression, you can tell within the first few paragraphs whether a site is going to be worth the time and this one delivered on that early promise nicely throughout the rest of what I read.

  3. Worth recognising that the post handled a familiar topic without reaching for any of the obvious hot takes, and a stop at globalcollaborationhub continued that fresh treatment, sites that find new angles on subjects others have exhausted are sites worth following carefully and this one has clearly developed that exploratory instinct through patient practice.

  4. Reading this post made me realise I had been settling for lower quality elsewhere, and a look at strategicpartnergroup extended that recalibration, content that exposes how much I had been accepting in adjacent sources is content with calibrating effect on my standards and this site is performing that calibration function across topics for me reliably.

  5. Approaching this with the usual skepticism I bring to new sites and being slowly persuaded, and a stop at trustedlineage continued that gradual persuasion, the careful path from skeptical reader to genuine fan is the only one I trust and this site has walked me along that path through patient consistent quality across pieces.

  6. Quality writing that respects the reader’s intelligence without overloading them, and a quick look at forwardenergyactivated reflected that approach, a balanced thoughtful site that earns trust by being consistent rather than by shouting about how trustworthy it is which is the usual approach online sadly across most content categories.

  7. A satisfying piece in the way that good meals are satisfying rather than just filling, and a look at signalfeedsaction extended that satisfaction, the metaphor between content and meals is one I find useful and this site reads as a satisfying meal rather than the empty calories that most content provides for casual readers.

  8. Reading this triggered a small but real correction in something I had assumed, and a stop at directionamplifiesmotion extended that corrective effect, content that updates my beliefs through evidence rather than rhetoric is content with intellectual integrity and this site has earned that label consistently across the pieces I have read so far today.

  9. Reading this prompted a small redirection in something I was working on, and a stop at growthpathway extended that redirecting influence, content that affects my actual work rather than just my thinking has the highest practical impact and this site is providing that level of influence for me at a sustainable rate apparently.

  10. The tone stayed consistent across the whole post which is harder than it looks for longer pieces, and a look at strategyalignmenthub continued the same voice, this kind of editorial consistency is a sign of either a single careful writer or a tightly run team and either is impressive today across the broader media environment.

  11. Picked a friend mentally as the audience for this and decided to send the link, and a look at ideaprocessing confirmed the send was the right choice, choosing whom to share content with is a small act of curation that I take more seriously than the public sharing most platforms encourage these days online.

  12. Now feeling confident enough in this site to use it as a reference point for evaluating others on the same topic, and a look at bondedhorizons continued the comparison friendly quality, sites that serve as quality benchmarks for their topic are precious and this one has clearly become a benchmark for me on this particular subject area.

  13. If you scroll past this site without looking carefully you will miss something, and a stop at forwardmovementlab extended that mild warning, the surface of the site does not advertise its quality loudly which means careful attention is required to recognise what is being offered here which is itself a kind of editorial signal.

  14. Useful information presented in a way that does not feel like a sales pitch, that is what I appreciated most, and a stop at actionstarter was the same, no upsell and no fake urgency just steady content laid out properly for someone trying to actually learn from it rather than just be sold to.

  15. Appreciate that you did not pad this with fluff to hit a word count, the post says what it needs to say and stops, and a look at growthmovesintentionally did the same, brevity here feels intentional not lazy which is a distinction many writers miss completely sometimes when they are working under deadlines.

  16. Now placing this in the small category of sites whose updates I would actually want to know about, and a stop at clarityguidesmovement confirmed that placement, the difference between sites I want to follow and sites I just consume from is real and this one has crossed into the active follow category from the casual consumption side.

  17. Probably one of the more reliable sources I have found for this kind of careful coverage, and a look at focustrajectory reinforced the reliability, the small group of sources I would describe as reliable for a given topic is curated carefully and this site has earned a place in that small group through consistent performance.

  18. Held my interest from the opening line through to the closing thought, and a stop at actionguidance did the same, content that earns sustained attention in an environment full of distractions is doing something right and this site is clearly doing several things right rather than just one or two which I really appreciate.

  19. A clean read with no irritations, and a look at actiondrivenmovement continued that frictionless quality, the absence of small irritations is something I notice only when present elsewhere and this site is one of the rare places where everything just works and lets me focus on the substance rather than fighting the format.

  20. Came away with a slightly better mental model of the topic than I started with, and a stop at actionfuelsprogress sharpened that further, content that improves the reader thinking apparatus rather than just dumping facts into it is the rare kind I genuinely value and seek out when I have time to read carefully.

  21. Closed the laptop after this and let the ideas settle for a few hours, and a stop at solidaritynetwork similarly rewarded reflective time, content that benefits from sitting with rather than racing past is the kind I want more of and the kind that this site appears to consistently produce week after week here.

  22. Worth recognising that the post did not pretend to be the final word on the topic, and a stop at globalunitybond continued that humility, content that admits its own scope and limits is more trustworthy than content that overreaches and this site has clearly developed the editorial maturity to know what it can and cannot claim well.

  23. Felt the writer respected me as a reader without making a show of doing so, and a look at progressmovesstrategicallynow continued that quiet respect, this is the kind of small but meaningful detail that separates the sites I bookmark from the ones I close after a single skim and never return to again no matter how interesting the headline.

  24. Started reading expecting to disagree and ended mostly nodding along, and a look at directionaldrive continued the pattern, content that wins agreement through evidence and reasoning rather than rhetorical force is the kind that actually shifts minds and this site clearly knows how to do that across what I have read so far.

  25. Even just sampling a few posts the consistency is what stands out, and a look at successbondcollective confirmed the broader pattern, sites where every piece I sample lives up to the standard set by the others are sites with serious quality control and this one has clearly invested in whatever editorial process produces that consistency reliably.

  26. Liked the natural conversational tone throughout, never stiff and never overly casual either, and a stop at progressflowsstrategically kept that comfortable middle ground going, finding a tone that respects the reader without becoming distant or overly familiar is harder than it sounds and this site nails that balance consistently across many different pieces.

  27. Speaking from the perspective of a fairly demanding reader the writing here clears the bar consistently, and a look at visionactivation continued clearing that bar, the calibration of demanding reader is something I apply to all sources and this site has been one of the few that handles the demanding reading well across pieces sampled.

  28. Thanks for the readable length, I finished it without checking how much was left, and a stop at futurefocusedbond kept me reading the same way, when I stop noticing the length of a piece because the content is engaging enough to sustain attention without willpower the writer has done their job well today.

  29. Picked this for my morning read because the topic seemed worth the time, and a look at secureunitybond confirmed the choice was right, my morning reading slot is precious and giving it to this site felt like a good investment rather than a waste which is a higher endorsement than I usually offer for content.

  30. The overall feel of the post was professional without being stuffy, and a look at directionalclarity kept that approachable expertise going, finding the right register for technical content is hard but this site has clearly figured out how to sound knowledgeable without slipping into that distant lecturing tone that loses readers in droves every time.

  31. Honestly the simplicity of the explanation made the topic click for me in a way other writeups had not, and a look at directionchannelsenergy continued that clarity into related areas, when a writer gets the level of explanation right the reader does the heavy lifting themselves and the post just enables it.

  32. Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at capitalbondedgroup continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.

  33. Reading this slowly to give it the attention it deserved, and a stop at signalclarifiesaction earned the same slow read, choosing to read slowly is a small act of respect for content quality and very few sites earn that respect from me but this one did so without any explicit ask which is the cleanest way.

  34. Started believing the writer knew the topic deeply by about the second paragraph, and a look at actioncreatesenergy reinforced that confidence, the speed at which a writer establishes credibility through their writing is a useful quality signal and this writer establishes it quickly and quietly without resorting to credential dropping or self promotion.

  35. Without comparing too aggressively to other sources this one stands out for the right reasons, and a look at directionfeedsmomentum continued that distinctive quality, content that distinguishes itself through substance rather than style tricks is content with lasting differentiation and this site has clearly chosen substance based differentiation as its core editorial strategy.

  36. Just want to acknowledge that the writing here is doing something right, and a quick visit to growthpath confirmed the same standards run across the broader site, recognising good work is something I try to do when I find it because the alternative is silence and silence rewards mediocrity.

  37. A small editorial detail caught my attention, the way headings related to body text, and a look at signalpowersdirection maintained that careful relationship, structural details like that show up to readers who notice them and the writers here have clearly thought about every level of the piece rather than just the words.

  38. Quality writing that respects the reader’s intelligence without overloading them, and a quick look at visionnavigation reflected that approach, a balanced thoughtful site that earns trust by being consistent rather than by shouting about how trustworthy it is which is the usual approach online sadly across most content categories.

  39. Just wanted to drop a quick note saying this was a useful read on a topic I have been circling, no fluff, and a stop at actionalignment added a few extra points that fit the same simple style which makes the whole site feel coherent rather than thrown together by many different writers with different goals.

  40. I came here looking for a quick answer and ended up reading the whole post because it was actually interesting, and after ideaorchestration I had a much fuller picture, no stress and no confusion just a clear walk through the topic that made everything fall into place without much effort.

  41. Found this useful, the points line up well with what I have been thinking about lately, and a stop at mutualcapitalhub added some angles I had not considered yet, definitely walking away with more than I came for which is the best outcome from time spent reading online for any kind of topic.

  42. Genuinely good work, the kind that holds up over multiple readings without losing its appeal, and a stop at focusdrivensuccess kept that going, definitely a site I will be returning to and probably mentioning to others who work in or care about this particular area of interest today and in coming weeks.

  43. Reading this felt productive in a way most internet reading does not, and a look at actionactivation continued that productive feeling, sometimes the open web feels like a waste of time but sites like this remind me why I still bother to look around rather than retreating to old reliable sources for everything I need.

  44. Skipped the comments section but might come back to read it, and a stop at ideasneeddirection hinted at a quality reader community, sites where the comments are worth reading separately from the post are increasingly rare and signal a particular kind of audience that has grown around the editorial vision over time gradually.

  45. Closed the tab with a small sense of finality rather than the usual rushed exit, and a stop at trustednetworkcircle produced the same considered closing, when reading ends with deliberate satisfaction rather than impatient skip you know the time was well spent and this site is producing those satisfying endings consistently across what I read.

  46. Found the rhythm of the prose particularly enjoyable on this read through, and a look at strategymap kept that musical quality going across the related pages, sentence rhythm is something most blog writers ignore but it makes a real difference in how content lands with the careful reader who cares.

  47. A piece that prompted a small mental rearrangement of how I order related ideas, and a look at strongconnectionalliance extended that rearranging effect, content that affects the structure of my thinking rather than just adding to it is content with the deepest kind of impact and this site is reaching that depth for me today.

  48. Thanks for the honest framing without exaggerated claims that the topic will change my life, and a stop at ideasflowintoaction kept the same modest tone, restraint in marketing language signals trustworthiness and the writers here are clearly playing the long game by building credibility rather than chasing immediate clicks through hyperbole.

  49. Came in skeptical and left mostly convinced, that is the highest praise I can offer, and a look at primecapitalbond pushed me further in the same direction, content that survives a critical first read is rare and worth recognising because most blog posts crumble under any real scrutiny these days when you actually pay attention closely.

  50. Solid little post, the kind that does not need to be flashy because the substance is doing the work, and a look at forwardmotionengine kept that quiet confidence going across the site, this is what writing looks like when the writer trusts the content to land on its own without theatrics or unnecessary attention seeking behaviour.

Deja un comentario