![]()
Otra vez los índices de impacto y su significado
En este blog he insistido en el hecho de que ya no se evalúa la ciencia por lo que se publica, si no dónde se publica y nos limitamos a «sumar» o «promediar» índices de impacto (Impact Factor, IF) de las revistas en las que se publica en vez de valorar el artículo individualmente. También he insistido en que los IFs se usan «alegremente», muchas veces sin conocer su significado real.
Hoy traigo a esta página un ejemplo espectacular que nos tiene que hacer reflexionar sobre el valor que puede tener el IF de las publicaciones científicas.
Se acaba de publicar el IF correspondiente a los artículos publicados en 2008. Y hay un cambio espectacular. La revista Acta Crystallographica Section A (Foundations of Crystallography) ha aumentado su IF en casi 25 veces, pasado de un digno 2’05 a un espectacular 49’93. ¿Por qué ha sido esto? ¿Ha aumentado la calidad de los artículos publicado? ¿Ha aumentado la exigencia del editor?
NO. La razón es que se ha publicado un artículo excelente y que toda la comunidad cristalográfica llevaba años esperando: A short history of SHELX por George M. Sheldrick, el «inventor» del programa SHELX, que es la herramienta computacional fundamental para refinar estructuras cristalográficas. Este artículo ha sido citado 6653 veces (a 25 de junio de 2010), con casi 6000 citas entre 2008 y 2009.
El segundo artículo más citado de Acta Crystallographica Section A ha sido citado 31 veces, el 10º más citado, 11 veces; hay 17 artículos que han sido citado 2 o una vez y hay 19 artículos que no han sido citados (de un total de 72 artículos publicados en 2008).
Como ya he pedido en este blog, leamos las publicaciones y veamos cuanto se ha citado cada artículo individualmente; especialmente, cuando tengamo que evaluar CVs para plazas, contratos, etc. Si seguimos teniendo en cuenta solo el índice de impacto de las revista, cometeremos injusticias. Si no cambiamos el sistema, solo me queda felicitar a los que hayan publicado en 2008 en Acta Crystallographica Section A, pues tendrán artículos con un IF de casi 50, aunque nunca haya sido citado.
P. D.: Por cierto, os habréis fijado que, sin cambiar prácticamente, la revista ha pasado de ser casi despreciada por los que solo publican por índice de impacto a ser una revista «excelente».
Bernardo Herradón
IQOG-CSIC
Really appreciate the lack of pop ups, modals, cookie banners stacking on top of each other, and a quick visit to directionactivatesprogress confirmed the same clean approach across the rest of the site, technical decisions about user experience are part of what makes content actually pleasant to engage with for sure.
Genuine reaction is that I will probably think about this on and off for a few days, and a look at growthorientedbond added fuel to that, the best content lingers in your head after you close the tab rather than evaporating immediately and this site clearly knows how to write that kind of memorable content.
Reading this slowly to give it the attention it deserved, and a stop at ideaclarity earned the same slow read, choosing to read slowly is a small act of respect for content quality and very few sites earn that respect from me but this one did so without any explicit ask which is the cleanest way.
Different feel from the algorithmically optimised posts that dominate the topic, and a stop at ideasflowwithintent reinforced that human touch, you can tell when a site is being run by someone who reads what they publish versus someone just hitting submit and moving on quickly to the next assignment without checking the result.
A piece that read as the work of someone who reads carefully themselves, and a look at progresswithclearintent continued that informed feel, writers who are also serious readers produce work with a different quality and this site reads as the product of someone steeped in good writing rather than just generating content for an audience.
Genuinely good work, the kind that holds up over multiple readings without losing its appeal, and a stop at actioncreatesmomentumflow kept that going, definitely a site I will be returning to and probably mentioning to others who work in or care about this particular area of interest today and in coming weeks.
Picked this up between two other things I was doing and got drawn in completely, and after claritychanneling my original tasks were completely forgotten for a while, content that derails a workflow in a positive way by being more interesting than what you were already doing is rare and worth recognising clearly.
Found this useful, the points line up well with what I have been thinking about lately, and a stop at corevaluealliance added some angles I had not considered yet, definitely walking away with more than I came for which is the best outcome from time spent reading online for any kind of topic.
A piece that demonstrated competence without performing it, and a look at growthflowsforwardcleanly maintained the same self assured but unshowy register, the gap between competence and performance of competence is one I track and this site has clearly chosen to demonstrate rather than perform which I find much more persuasive as a reader.
Comfortable read, finished it without realising how much time had passed, and a look at focusnavigationhub pulled me into more pages the same way, the absence of friction in good content lets time disappear and that is one of the highest compliments I can pay any piece of writing I find online during a regular search session.
Felt no urge to argue with the conclusions even though I started the post slightly skeptical, and a look at forwardenergyreleased maintained that pattern, writing that earns agreement through clarity of argument rather than rhetorical pressure is the kind I find most persuasive and the kind I want to read more of these days.
Yesterday I was complaining about the state of online writing and today this site has temporarily fixed that complaint, and a look at evergreenbondhub extended that mood reversal, the short term mood improvement that comes from finding good content is real and this site has produced that improvement for me at a useful moment.
Now setting up a small reminder to revisit the site on a slow day, and a stop at evercorebond confirmed the reminder was a good idea, planning return visits is a small organisational act that signals trust in ongoing quality and this site has earned that planned return through consistent performance across the pieces I have read so far.
Now wishing I had found this site sooner, and a look at strategicflow extended that mild regret, the calculation of how many years of good content I missed by not finding the right sources earlier is one I try not to make too often but it does come up sometimes when I find sites this good.
My professional context would benefit from having this kind of resource available, and a look at unitedbusinessbond extended the professional applicability, the rare site that contributes meaningfully to professional work rather than just personal interest is content with multiplied value and this one is providing that professional utility consistently across multiple pieces.
Looking at the surface design and the substance together this site has both right, and a look at signalturnsaction reinforced that integrated quality, sites where presentation and content reinforce each other rather than fighting are sites with full editorial coherence and this one has clearly invested in both layers in a balanced way.
Liked how the writer used real examples instead of theoretical ones to make the points stick, and a stop at ideaflowengine added even more concrete examples, this is the kind of practical approach that respects readers who actually want to apply what they learn rather than just nodding along passively without doing anything useful.
Genuinely well crafted writing, the kind that makes the topic look easier than it actually is, and a look at directionshapesprogress added even more depth, you can feel the experience behind every line which is something only writers who have been at this for a while can pull off with this level of grace.
Found this via a link from another piece I was reading and the click was worth it, and a stop at professionaltrustgroup extended the value across more material, the open web still rewards clicking through citations when the underlying writers care about each other work and this site clearly belongs to that network.
Really appreciate the lack of pop ups, modals, cookie banners stacking on top of each other, and a quick visit to unitedgrowthcircle confirmed the same clean approach across the rest of the site, technical decisions about user experience are part of what makes content actually pleasant to engage with for sure.
The use of plain language without dumbing down the topic was really well done, and a look at clarityinitiator continued in that same accessible style, this is something many technical writers fail at because they either confuse their readers or condescend to them but here neither problem appears at all which is impressive really.
Refreshing to read something where the words actually mean something instead of filling space, and a stop at forwardmotionlogic kept that going, the writing here trusts the reader to follow along without endless repetition or constant reminders of what was already said earlier in the post which I appreciate.
Thank you for the genuine effort here, it shows in every paragraph and not just the headline, and after my visit to bondedfuture I was sure this site cares about getting things right rather than chasing clicks, which is the main reason I will come back later this week to read more.
Strong recommendation from me, anyone curious about the topic should make time for this, and a look at ideasbecomeforward only sharpens that recommendation further, the kind of resource that holds up against careful scrutiny rather than crumbling at the first critical question is rare and worth pointing other people toward when the topic comes up.
A piece that ended with a clean landing rather than fading out, and a look at ideastomotion maintained the same crisp conclusions, endings that resolve rather than dissolve are a sign of careful structural thinking and this site has clearly invested in how its pieces conclude rather than letting them simply run out of energy.
Beyond the topic at hand this site reads as a small ongoing project of taking writing seriously, and a look at covenantpartners reinforced that project quality, sites that treat publishing as an ongoing serious practice rather than as content production for traffic are sites worth supporting and this one has clearly chosen the serious approach.
Once you find a site like this the search for similar voices begins, and a look at bondedprosperity extended the search energy, finding a high quality reference point makes the gap between it and adjacent sources visible in a way it was not before and this site has provided that high reference point across multiple recent visits.
Now recognising the post as a rare example of careful writing on a topic that mostly receives careless treatment, and a stop at signalcreatesalignment extended that contrast with the average elsewhere, content that highlights how much the average is settling for low quality is content that has both internal merit and external value as a benchmark.
Now thinking about how to apply some of this to a project I have been planning, and a look at clarityleadsforward added more material for the planning, content that connects to my actual creative work rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind that earns priority placement in my reading rotation consistently going forward.
Better than the average post on this subject by some distance, and a look at directionalnavigation reinforced that, you can tell within the first paragraph that the writer here actually cares about the topic rather than just covering it for the sake of having something to publish that week or that day.
Spent a few minutes here and came away with a clearer picture of the topic, the writing keeps things simple without dumbing them down, and after a stop at connectedleadersbond the rest of the points lined up neatly which is something I appreciate when I am short on time and need answers fast.
Felt the writer respected the topic without being precious about it, and a look at focusnavigation continued that respectful but unfussy treatment, finding the right register for serious topics is hard and this site has clearly figured out how to take the topic seriously while still being readable for casual visitors regularly.
Recommended to anyone working in or curious about this area, the depth and clarity combine well, and a look at actioncompass keeps that going across more pages, the kind of site that earns regular visits rather than chasing trends has my respect because it suggests genuine commitment to the topic itself rather than to chasing trends.
Now noticing that the post avoided the temptation to be funny in places where humour would have undermined the substance, and a stop at strategyguided maintained the same restraint, knowing when to be serious is a rare editorial virtue and this site has clearly developed it through what I assume is careful editorial practice over years.
Took a chance on the headline and was rewarded, and a stop at focusamplifiesgrowth kept the rewards coming as I clicked through, the kind of place where every link leads somewhere worth the click is a small luxury on the modern web where so many sites are mostly empty calories disguised as content.
Came in expecting another generic take and got something with actual character instead, and a look at focusalignmenthub carried that personality forward, finding a distinct voice on a saturated topic is impressive and worth pointing out when it happens because most sites end up sounding identical to their nearest competitors quickly.
Worth pointing out that the post avoided the temptation to summarise everything at the end, and a look at professionalunitybond continued that confident closing approach, content that trusts readers to retain the substance without being reminded of it at the end is content that respects the reader and this site practices that respect.
Coming back to this one, definitely, and a quick visit to lifelongalliance only made me more sure of that, the kind of writing that makes you want to set aside time later rather than rushing through it now while distracted by everything else competing for attention on the screen today across so many tabs.
Decided not to comment because the post said what needed saying, and a stop at heritageunitybond continued that complete feel, content that does not invite obvious additions or corrections from readers is content that has been carefully considered and this site appears to consistently produce pieces that satisfy rather than provoke unnecessary follow ups.
Reading this gave me a quiet moment of intellectual pleasure that I had not been expecting, and a stop at directionpowersvelocity extended that pleasure across more pages, the unexpected reward of stumbling into careful writing is one of the small ongoing pleasures of reading the open web and this site is delivering it reliably.
My friends would appreciate a few of these posts and I will be sending links accordingly, and a look at growthunlocksprogress added more pages to my share queue, content that earns shares to specific people in specific contexts is content with social utility and this site is generating those targeted shares from me consistently lately.
Felt mildly happier after reading, which sounds silly but is true, and a look at growthflowsforwardnow extended that small mood lift, content that improves rather than degrades my mental state is content I want more of and the cumulative effect of reading sites that lift versus sites that drag is real over time.
Will be coming back to this for sure, too much good content to absorb in one sitting, and a stop at clarityleadsmovement only added more pages I want to dig through, this site is going onto my regular rotation list because it consistently delivers something worth the visit lately rather than empty filler.
Recommended to anyone working in or curious about this area, the depth and clarity combine well, and a look at claritymotion keeps that going across more pages, the kind of site that earns regular visits rather than chasing trends has my respect because it suggests genuine commitment to the topic itself rather than to chasing trends.
Speaking as someone who reads a lot on this topic this site has earned a high position in my source rankings, and a stop at collaborativesuccessbond reinforced that ranking, the informal ranking of sources for a topic is something I maintain mentally and this site has moved into the upper portion of those rankings clearly.
Thanks for keeping things clear and to the point, that is honestly hard to find online these days, and after reading through visionarypartnersclub the message stayed consistent which makes me trust the information being shared more than I usually do on similar pages that cover this same kind of topic.
Came in skeptical of the angle and left mostly persuaded, and a stop at focusdirection pushed me a bit further in the same direction, content that can move a critical reader by argument rather than rhetoric is rare and worth pointing out because it indicates real substance underneath the surface presentation here.
Started a draft response in my head and ended without publishing it because the post said it well enough, and a look at progressstructure produced the same effect, content that satisfies my urge to add to it by being complete enough on its own is rare and represents a particular kind of editorial completeness here.
Found the writing surprisingly fresh for what is by now a well covered topic, and a stop at focusignition kept that freshness going across the related pages, original perspective on familiar ground is hard to come by and this site has clearly earned its place in the conversation rather than just rehashing old ideas.
Cuts through the usual marketing fluff that dominates this topic online, and a stop at progressformsnaturally kept the same clean approach going, this is the kind of writing that respects the reader’s time rather than wasting it on repetitive setups before finally getting to the point at hand which is what most sites do.