Los materiales nanoestructurados en nuestra vida diaria. Entrevista a Rosa Menéndez.
Entrevista realizada por Lorena Cabeza (DIVULGA) para Profes.net
Rosa Menéndez nació en Corollos, Asturias, en 1956. Tras graduarse en Química y doctorarse en esta misma disciplina por la Universidad de Oviedo en 1986, pudo llevar a cabo varias estancias postdoctorales en Inglaterra y Estados Unidos. En 1989 se incorpora al Instituto Nacional del Carbón del CSIC, donde actualmente lleva a cabo su trabajo como profesora de investigación. Entre los años 2003 y 2008 ha sido directora de este instituto, y entre 2008 y 2009 ostentó el cargo de vicepresidenta de Investigación Científica y Técnica del CSIC. Es autora de más de 160 artículos en revistas científicas de impacto y ha dirigido 16 tesis doctorales. Su investigación se centra en la química de los materiales y la energía, y en concreto en la mejora de los procesos de conversión del carbón y la puesta en valor de sus derivados y los del petróleo. También dirige una línea de investigación sobre la síntesis química del grafeno, un material que puede revolucionar nuestras vidas en un futuro cercano.
¿Qué trabajo lleva a cabo en el INCAR?
R.- Desde comienzos de los años 90 venimos desarrollando materiales de carbono de características muy distintas, como fibras de carbono, materiales compuestos, carbones activados y en los últimos años materiales grafénicos. Partiendo de derivados del carbón y del petróleo, preparamos precursores específicos para cada tipo de material. Y el material, a su vez, viene condicionado por la aplicación para la que está previsto. Nuestros materiales encuentran aplicación en el sector aeronáutico, con materiales compuestos; el almacenamiento de energía, con carbones activados y grafenos; la catálisis, con carbones activados y grafenos; y el medio ambiente, con carbones activados y grafenos para la eliminación de contaminantes en vertidos industriales.
¿Qué son los materiales nanoestructurados? ¿Cuál es su ventaja respecto a otros materiales convencionales?
R.- Desde que se comenzó a trabajar en nanotecnología, en la década de los 80, se han tratado de desarrollar nuevos métodos de producción de materiales constituidos por cristales de un tamaño inferior a los 100 nanómetros, los llamados materiales nanoestructurados. Cuando se reduce el tamaño de los materiales al rango nanométrico, se inducen diferencias en sus propiedades físicas. También los procesos superficiales se ven fuertemente alterados. Por ello, un control preciso de las dimensiones de los materiales en el rango de los nanómetros nos permite variar sus propiedades. Esto abre la puerta al diseño de materiales para mercados muy diversos como las aplicaciones biomédicas, ópticas, en energía, etc.
¿Están presentes los materiales nanoestructurados en nuestra vida diaria?
R.- Lo están desde hace años. Por ejemplo, los ordenadores han experimentado desde los años 90 mejoras muy importantes debido precisamente al uso de materiales nanoestructurados. Los paneles solares fabricados con nanomateriales también permiten minimizar el empleo de bloques de silicio. Otros materiales comunes que contienen nanopartículas son las cremas solares, donde se emplean para absorber la radiación UV, además de para facilitar su incorporación a la piel. También se emplean nanopartículas de plata como agentes biocidas para minimizar el riesgo de contraer infecciones. Los nanomateriales también están presentes en el deporte: bicicletas con nanotubos de carbono, raquetas de tenis reforzadas con estos nanotubos, etc. Y todavía son muchas más las aplicaciones que se esperan en los próximos años: leds fabricados a partir de puntos cuánticos mucho más baratos que los actuales, materiales capaces de introducirse en nuestro cuerpo y atacar selectivamente células cancerígenas, etc.
¿Son estos materiales seguros?
R.- La mayoría de los nanomateriales no son más peligrosos que sus equivalentes “macro”. Por ejemplo, los materiales en forma de películas delgadas que conforman las memorias de los ordenadores no son más dañinas por el hecho de ser nano. En general, debemos distinguir dos casos: uno, los nanomateriales adheridos a otros materiales, que no resultan más peligrosas que las micropartículas correspondientes (depende solo de su naturaleza: el arsénico es igual de tóxico nanoestructurado o no); y dos, nanopartículas dispersas en el aire, que pueden resultar más peligrosas al ser inhaladas.
¿Cuáles son los materiales avanzados más prometedores en los que se está investigando?
R.- El mundo de los materiales es muy amplio, pero todo lo relacionado con nanomateriales, láminas delgadas y materiales inteligentes está dentro de lo más prometedor. En concreto, existen grandes expectativas en relación con los materiales grafénicos por su gran potencial para aplicaciones que van desde el campo de las comunicaciones y microelectrónica a otros ámbitos como la química fina y la energía, en producción y almacenamiento. Se trata de un material con unas propiedades electrónicas únicas, además de una especial resistencia y flexibilidad.
¿Qué características son las que hacen del grafeno un material tan especial?
R.- El grafeno, formado por una capa de átomos de carbono, es a la vez metálico, flexible y transparente. Es resistente, sus constantes elásticas son las más altas que se han medido en un material, y admite tensiones muy elevadas sin romperse. Es además muy impermeable, ya que no permite el paso de átomos y moléculas a pesar de su pequeño espesor. Desde el punto de vista químico es un material inerte.
¿En qué aplicaciones concretas se espera que se use?
R.- El hecho de presentar unas excelentes propiedades mecánicas, térmicas, eléctricas y ópticas, le convierte en candidato para un gran número de aplicaciones en áreas tan diversas como la nanoelectrónica, los sensores moleculares, las telecomunicaciones, los componentes mecánicos, en forma de material compuesto, almacenamiento de energía y salud, por ejemplo, en la liberación controlada de fármacos.
¿En qué fase se encuentra la investigación sobre grafenos?
R.- La investigación sobre grafenos avanza de forma rápida, a pasos agigantados científicamente hablando. En estos momentos el objetivo es buscar procesos que permitan su obtención en grandes cantidades, de forma competitiva desde el punto de vista económico y energético, y respetando el medio ambiente. Las expectativas superan con creces a las planteadas por los fullerenos y nanotubos de carbono en su día, y parecen estar más próximas a su materialización. Tienen la ventaja de la variedad y simplicidad de los procesos y de la variedad en la calidad de los materiales, con lo que pueden ser utilizados en aplicaciones muy diversas. Para la utilización masiva de los grafenos todavía queda mucho camino por recorrer y mucha investigación por realizar.
¿Cómo se obtiene el grafeno?
R.- Se utilizan fundamentalmente dos vías para su síntesis, a partir del grafito o materiales grafíticos: mediante la separación de las láminas de grafeno individuales mecánicamente o por vía química -lo que se denomina método top-down-, y mediante síntesis química o depósito en fase de vapor a partir de moléculas más pequeñas –el método bottom-up-. La primera incluye también la obtención de grafenos mediante apertura de nanotubos. Cada una de ellas dispone de un amplio abanico de precursores y condiciones de proceso que enriquecen o dificultan, según se mire, la consecución del material final. En nuestro grupo los estamos preparando por vía química, utilizando distintos grafitos de partida y aplicando distintos procedimientos de reducción, y también por apertura de nanofibras y nanotubos, y mediante exfoliación mecánica del grafito.
Y, ¿qué hay de los fullerenos?
R.- Los fullerenos han marcado un hito desde el punto de vista científico. Se mostró al mundo una nueva forma de carbono que nadie hubiese imaginado. Supusieron un salto cualitativo en la ciencia del carbono, hasta entonces basada en las dos formas alotrópicas conocidas por todos, el grafito y el diamante. Se ha trabajado intensamente en la búsqueda de aplicaciones para este material en campos como la biomedicina o la energía, pero en mi opinión no se han consolidado y siguen siendo materia de investigación después de más de veinte años. También es relevante el que abrieran el camino al descubrimiento de los nanotubos de carbono, que sí se están produciendo a escala industrial y están ampliando considerablemente su rango de aplicaciones.
Without overstating it this is a quietly excellent post, and a look at focusactivation extended that quiet excellence, content that earns superlatives without demanding them through marketing language is content that has truly earned them through the substance and this site has clearly produced work in that earned excellence category today.
Reading the writers other posts after this one suggests the quality is consistent rather than peak, and a stop at focusfeedsmomentum confirmed the consistent quality reading, sites that hold the same level across many pieces rather than peaking on a few are sites with sustainable editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed that.
High quality writing, no marketing speak and no buzzwords that mean nothing, and a stop at claritymovement kept that going, simple direct content that actually communicates something is harder to find than it should be and this is one of the rare places that gets it right consistently across many different posts.
A piece that took its time without dragging, and a look at signalunlocksprogress kept the same patient pace, the difference between unhurried and slow is a fine editorial distinction and this site has clearly found the unhurried side without slipping into the slow side which would have lost me as a reader quickly otherwise.
Approaching this site through a casual link click and being surprised by what I found, and a look at growthflowswithsignal extended the surprise, the rare experience of stumbling into excellent independent content rather than predictable mediocrity is one of the actual remaining pleasures of casual web browsing and this site provided it cleanly.
Now realising the post solved a small problem I had been carrying for weeks, and a look at clarityactivator extended that problem solving function, content that connects to specific unresolved questions in my own life rather than just providing general interest is content with real practical impact and this site is providing that practical value.
Started a draft response in my head and ended without publishing it because the post said it well enough, and a look at claritystrategy produced the same effect, content that satisfies my urge to add to it by being complete enough on its own is rare and represents a particular kind of editorial completeness here.
A genuine compliment to the writer for keeping the post focused on what mattered, and a look at unitedcapitalbond continued that disciplined focus, focus is a editorial choice that compounds across many small decisions and this site has clearly made those small decisions consistently across what I have read so far this week here.
I learned more from this short post than from longer articles I read earlier today, and a stop at actiondrivesdirection added even more useful detail without going off topic, this site clearly knows how to keep things focused without sacrificing depth which is a hard balance to strike for any writer.
A piece that took its time without dragging, and a look at signalpowersgrowth kept the same patient pace, the difference between unhurried and slow is a fine editorial distinction and this site has clearly found the unhurried side without slipping into the slow side which would have lost me as a reader quickly otherwise.
If I had to defend the time I spend reading independent blogs this site would feature in the defence, and a look at progressactivator reinforced that defensive utility, the ongoing case for non algorithmic reading is one I make to myself periodically and sites like this one provide the actual evidence that supports the case clearly.
Worth saying that the quiet confidence of the writing is what landed first, and a look at claritynavigator continued that quiet quality, confident writing without the loud display of confidence is a rare combination and this site has clearly developed both the knowledge and the editorial restraint to land that combination consistently.
Took something from this I did not expect to find, and a stop at directionalstructure added another unexpected useful piece, content that exceeds expectations rather than just meeting them is the kind that builds enthusiasm and earns repeat visits without any explicit ask from the writer or platform behind the work being read.
Now feeling the quiet pleasure of finding writing that takes itself seriously without being self serious, and a stop at securepathbond extended that subtle pleasure, the gap between earnest and pretentious is fine and this site has clearly chosen to land on the earnest side without slipping over into pretentious which is impressive.
Felt the writer respected the topic without being precious about it, and a look at actioncreatesvelocity continued that respectful but unfussy treatment, finding the right register for serious topics is hard and this site has clearly figured out how to take the topic seriously while still being readable for casual visitors regularly.
Quietly the writers approach to the topic differs from the dominant takes I have been encountering, and a stop at globalcollaborationhub extended that distinctive approach, content that maintains a different perspective without explicitly arguing against the dominant ones is content with confident editorial identity and this site has that confidence throughout pieces.
I really like the calm tone here, it does not push anything on the reader, and after I went through strategicpartnergroup I felt the same way, just steady useful content laid out without drama, which is exactly what someone trying to learn something quickly needs to find rather than aggressive marketing.
Honest opinion is that this is the kind of post that builds long term trust with readers, and a look at trustedlineage reinforced that perception, the slow accumulation of trust through consistent quality is the only sustainable way to build a real audience and this site is clearly playing that long game.
Quality writing that respects the reader’s intelligence without overloading them, and a quick look at forwardenergyactivated reflected that approach, a balanced thoughtful site that earns trust by being consistent rather than by shouting about how trustworthy it is which is the usual approach online sadly across most content categories.
Solid little post, the kind that does not need to be flashy because the substance is doing the work, and a look at directionamplifiesmotion kept that quiet confidence going across the site, this is what writing looks like when the writer trusts the content to land on its own without theatrics or unnecessary attention seeking behaviour.
Top notch writing, every paragraph carries weight and nothing feels like filler, and a stop at signalfeedsaction reflected that same care, a rare thing on the open web these days where most pages exist for clicks rather than actual reader value or anything close to that which is honestly a real shame.
Liked the careful selection of which details to include and which to skip, and a stop at strategyalignmenthub reflected the same editorial judgement, knowing what to leave out is just as important as knowing what to include and this site has clearly figured out where that line sits for the topics it covers regularly.
Glad the writer did not feel compelled to cover every possible angle of the topic, focus is a virtue, and a stop at growthpathway reflected the same disciplined scope, knowing what to leave out is half of what makes good writing good and this post has clearly been edited with that principle in mind.
Now adjusting my mental model of how the topic fits into the broader landscape, and a look at ideaprocessing extended that adjustment, content that affects my structural understanding rather than just my factual knowledge is content with deeper impact and this site is providing those structural updates at a meaningful rate consistently across topics.
Bookmark folder created specifically for this site, and a look at forwardmovementlab confirmed the dedicated folder was the right call, dedicated folders for individual sites are a level of organisation I rarely deploy and this site has earned that level of dedicated tracking based on the consistency I have seen so far across sessions.
Looking at this objectively the editorial quality is hard to deny even setting aside personal taste, and a stop at bondedhorizons maintained the same objective quality, the gap between what I personally enjoy and what is objectively well crafted exists and this site clears both bars simultaneously which is rarer than it sounds.
Useful information presented in a way that does not feel like a sales pitch, that is what I appreciated most, and a stop at actionstarter was the same, no upsell and no fake urgency just steady content laid out properly for someone trying to actually learn from it rather than just be sold to.
Appreciate that you did not pad this with fluff to hit a word count, the post says what it needs to say and stops, and a look at growthmovesintentionally did the same, brevity here feels intentional not lazy which is a distinction many writers miss completely sometimes when they are working under deadlines.
Reading this back to back with a similar piece elsewhere made the quality difference obvious, and a stop at clarityguidesmovement only widened the gap, comparing content side by side is a useful exercise and the gap between this site and average competitors in the space is large enough to be noticeable from the first paragraph.
Reading this gave me something to think about for the rest of the afternoon, and after focustrajectory I had even more to mull over, the kind of post that lingers in the background of your day rather than evaporating immediately is genuinely valuable in an attention economy that punishes depth rather than rewarding it.
Bookmark added with a small mental note that this is a site to keep, and a look at actionguidance reinforced the keep status, the verb keep rather than visit captures something about how I think about this kind of site and it is a higher tier of relationship than I have with most places online today.
Found the writing surprisingly fresh for what is by now a well covered topic, and a stop at actionfuelsprogress kept that freshness going across the related pages, original perspective on familiar ground is hard to come by and this site has clearly earned its place in the conversation rather than just rehashing old ideas.
Reading this gave me a small sense of progress on a topic I have been slowly working through, and a stop at actiondrivenmovement added another step forward, learning happens in small increments across many sources and finding sources that consistently contribute is the actual practical value of careful curation in an information rich world.
Found this useful, the points line up well with what I have been thinking about lately, and a stop at globalunitybond added some angles I had not considered yet, definitely walking away with more than I came for which is the best outcome from time spent reading online for any kind of topic.
Just wanted to drop a quick note saying this was a useful read on a topic I have been circling, no fluff, and a stop at solidaritynetwork added a few extra points that fit the same simple style which makes the whole site feel coherent rather than thrown together by many different writers with different goals.
Coming back tomorrow when I can give this a proper read, the post deserves better attention than I can give right now, and a look at directionaldrive suggests there is plenty more here that deserves the same treatment, definitely a site I will be exploring properly over the next few days when I can.
Did not expect much when I clicked through but ended up reading the whole thing carefully, and a stop at progressmovesstrategicallynow kept that engagement going, sometimes the unassuming sites turn out to deliver more than the flashy ones which is something I have learned to look out for over time online lately and across topics.
Pass this along to colleagues if the topic comes up, the framing here is sensible, and a stop at successbondcollective adds more useful angles to share, the kind of content that improves conversations rather than just feeding them is what makes a resource genuinely valuable in professional contexts going forward over time and across project boundaries too.
The overall feel of the post was professional without being stuffy, and a look at progressflowsstrategically kept that approachable expertise going, finding the right register for technical content is hard but this site has clearly figured out how to sound knowledgeable without slipping into that distant lecturing tone that loses readers in droves every time.
Reading this gave me a small mental break from the heavier reading I had been doing, and a stop at futurefocusedbond extended that lighter feel, content that provides relief without becoming trivial is harder to produce than people realise and this site has clearly figured out how to be light without being shallow at all.
This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at visionactivation kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.
Came back to this twice now in the same week which is unusual for me, and a look at secureunitybond suggested I will keep coming back, the kind of post that earns repeated visits rather than one and done reading is the gold standard for content quality and this site clearly hit that standard.
The overall feel of the post was professional without being stuffy, and a look at directionalclarity kept that approachable expertise going, finding the right register for technical content is hard but this site has clearly figured out how to sound knowledgeable without slipping into that distant lecturing tone that loses readers in droves every time.
Skipped the social share buttons but might come back to actually use one later, and a stop at directionchannelsenergy extended that share urge, content that triggers genuine sharing impulses rather than performative ones is content that has actually moved me and not many posts in a typical week do that for me actually.
Top quality material, deserves more attention than it probably gets, and a look at capitalbondedgroup reflected the same effort across the site, a hidden gem in the modern web where most attention goes to whoever shouts loudest rather than whoever actually delivers the best content for their readers without much marketing fanfare.
Felt the post had been quietly polished rather than aggressively styled, and a look at signalclarifiesaction confirmed the same understated polish, sites whose quality reveals itself slowly rather than announcing itself loudly are the kind I trust more deeply because the trust is not based on first impressions of marketing but actual substance.
Closed my email tab so I could read this without interruption, and a stop at actioncreatesenergy earned the same protected attention, when content is good enough to defend against the usual digital distractions you know it deserves better than the half attention most online reading gets in a typical busy day.
Reading this brought back the satisfaction I used to get from blogs ten years ago, and a stop at directionfeedsmomentum kept that nostalgic quality alive, sites that capture what was good about an earlier era of internet writing are increasingly precious and this one is doing that without feeling like a deliberate throwback at all.
The lack of unnecessary jargon made the post accessible without sacrificing accuracy, and a look at growthpath continued in the same accessible style, technical topics often hide behind specialised vocabulary but here the writer trusts the reader to keep up with plain language and that trust pays off nicely throughout the entire post.
Decided to read this site for a while before forming a verdict, and the verdict after several pages is positive, and a stop at signalpowersdirection continued that pattern, judging a site requires more than one post and giving sites a fair sample is something I try to do for promising candidates rather than rushing to dismiss.