Los peligros de la ignorancia científica
Hasta ahora he considerado a La Vanguardia como un periódico serio. Sin embargo, en los últimos tiempos están dando cobijo a una serie de personajes que propagan sus ideas pseudocientíficas en sus venerable páginas.
Lo último que me ha llegado, se publicó el pasado 30 de mayo. Una entrevista a un ¿divulgador? y ¿agricultor ecológico? que afirma «Estamos comiendo petróleo«.
Claro, leí el titular y pensé que la entrevista se la estaban haciendo a un microorganismo extremófilo, de esos raros que son capaces de comerse las porquerías que dejó el maldito Prestige (sí, ese; se acuerdan, el de «los hilitos» que dijo un tal M. Rajoy Brey) en nuestras costas gallegas; y que esa afirmación estaba dirigida a sus congérenes, y otras especies relacionadas, devoradoras de hidrocarburos.
Pero no es un bichito de esos que le gustan a mis amigos los (micro)biólogos. Al menos por la foto de la entrevista, no es un microorganismo; sino que es, aparentemente, un individuo de nuestra especie (homo ¿sapiens?). Bueno, pienso «ha sido una exageración del periodista que ha querido sacar un titular de una frase inocua del entrevistado«.
¡¡¡Pero no!!! Este tal señor agricultor ¿ecológico? y ¿divulgador? lo dice en la entrevista. A continuación reproduzco literalmente la pregunta y la respuesta:
P.: Incluso hay productos, según explica usted, que… ¡llevan petróleo!
R.: Efectivamente. De hecho, algo más del 90% de los productos de síntesis química (insecticidas, herbicidas, todo lo que no son productos agroecológicos) provienen todos del petróleo. Sin saberlo, estamos comiendo petróleo. Evidentemente, te lo comes tan disgregado que no te lo parece, pero lo estás haciendo.
Como se ve, no hay lugar para la duda.
Y esa respuesta demuestra que este individuo es un profundo ignorante científico. Y que conste que lo de ignorante no es insulto, sino que es el significado del diccionario de la RAE para «el que no tiene noticia de algo«.
Y este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? tiene una profunda ignorancia de química. No voy a darle ninguna lección de química (que se compre un libro para aprender), sólo decirle que la química es la ciencia de la transformación de la materia y que cuando A se transforma en B; A y B son dos sustancias químicas distintas (como si fuesen dos letras distintas del alfabeto) y, por consiguiente, sus propiedades (químicas, físicas, biológicas, tecnológicas) son también distintas.
Le voy a poner un ejemplo sencillo, que usted, señor agricultor ¿ecológico? puede entender.
El hidrógeno es un gas, explosivo por más señas. Si respiramos hidrógeno, morimos, al menos asfixiados, aunque podríamos tener una muerte aún más cruenta.
El oxígeno es también un gas. Es esencial para nuestra vida; pero, eso sí, mezclado con otro gas (el nitrógeno) en una proporción aproximada de 4 a 1 (exactamente 78 a 21) formando el aire (el 1% restante es mezcla de otros gases). Aunque el oxígeno es fundamental para nuestra existencia, en estado puro es un veneno potente para el ser humano y si lo ingerimos puro y en cantidad, tendríamos una muerte segura, y además espectacular (más o menos como una falla valenciana).
Pero, ¿qué ocurre si mezclamos estos dos gases (hidrógeno y oxígeno) tan peligrosos? ¡Se forma agua! Un líquido, no tóxico y esencial para la vida. Una reacción química hace que dos gases extremadamente peligrosos se combinen dando lugar a un ¡líquido esencial para la vida!
Espero que este ejemplo aporte alguna luz a su ignorancia química y se dé cuenta de que una vez que un derivado del petróleo se transforma químicamente, las propiedades de lo que se obtiene no tiene nada que ver con el material de partida y, mucho menos con el petróleo que antes de estos procesos se somete a una destilación para separar componentes.
Para su información, los compuestos químicos más sencillos que se encuentran en el petróleo son el metano y el etileno. El metano da poco juego en la preparación de sustancias químicas sintéticas; aunque sí para proporcionarnos energía, que este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? usará; pues no creo que se caliente con la madera de sus bosques o no encienda ni una bombilla en su casa.
El etileno es un material de partida importante para la industria química de la que el señor agricultor ¿ecológico? se beneficia; o ¿es que va desnudo por la vida o no usa un simple bolígrafo para escribir o un ordenador o un teléfono móvil? cuando enferma ¿qué toma?
Las interrogantes en agricultor ¿ecológico? no son un error de mi teclado. ¡No! Son intencionadas. No voy a entrar con discutir a los defensores de una cierta manera de cultivar los campos (para eso están Mulet o JAL); pero sí me molesta que se falsee la terminología. Agricultura ecológica es un oxímoron, pues desde el momento en que un campo se cultiva (es decir, se hace agricultura) se deja de hacer ecologismo al estar manipulado por la mano del hombre. Por lo tanto, la agricultura ecológica no existe.
Este hombre tiene una propuesta curiosa. Propone que todos debemos plantar un huerto (por ejemplo, de lechugas; aunque es más ambicioso y propone variedad de cultivo) en nuestros balcones y terrazas. Si estáis interesado en esta ideas (no voy a entrar a valorarla para que no me dé un ataque de risa) u os preguntáis como se puede alimentar una familia con esta ¿abundante? cosecha, recomiendo leer la blanda entrevista.
Yo voy a seguir con lo mío: la QUÍMICA (¡con mayúsculas!) y por desgracia con la ignorancia del señor agricultor ¿ecológico?
Propone plantar huertos ecológicos en los balcones de las viviendas para de esta manera «no tener que comer petróleo». Teniendo en cuenta el escaso conocimiento químico que este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? ha demostrado, no esperaba de él un mínimo conocimiento bioquímico.
Le digo a este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? que cuando coma la lechuga de su huerto (perdón, balcón) también está comiendo petróleo. Si este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? está leyendo este post se le quedarán los ojos como platos. «¿Comer petróleo? ¡¡¡Si todo es super-mega-ultra-ecológico!!!«, me responderá.
Si, señor agricultor ¿ecológico?, según su conocimiento de química, usted está comiendo petróleo cuando se come su lechuga. «¿Por qué?» Me preguntará el señor agricultor ¿ecológico?. La respuesta es sencilla. Usted se come la lechuga; principalmente está comiendo carbohidratos (y otras sustancias químicas) que se han sintetizado (sé que la palabra le horroriza, pero es verdad) por las células de la planta. Y usted me contestará «que todo es muy natural, muy eco y muy bio» Yo le contestaré «¿Y sabe usted de dónde procede el carbono de los carbohidratos de la lechuga que se está comiendo?» Teniendo en cuenta sus conocimientos de química, su respuesta será «No» y en ese momento yo le contestaré (con una media sonrisa) «Del CO2, también conocido como dióxido de carbono o anhídrido carbónico» Y este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? se echará a temblar, pues le he nombrado a una de sus bestias negras, el CO2. Y además, le digo que ese CO2 procede de la combustión de derivados de hidrocarburos en automóviles o centrales térmicas; es decir, del petróleo.
Por lo tanto, sintiéndolo mucho, señor agricultor ¿ecológico?; usted también come petróleo de su huerto (perdón, balcón). Sólo tiene una alternativa, no comer. Claro, así seguro que se muere pronto (eso sí, sin estar químicamente contaminado); o más fácil, no vuelva a exponer su ignorancia científica en los medios de comunicación.
Nota tras el post químico. Aunque he preferido centrarme en los aspectos químicos de la entrevista, ésta no tiene desperdicio. Como cuando dice que hay que cortar el cesped cuando la Luna esté en la constelación de Gémini (triste es que un periódico serio publique esto, que parece una broma) o como le gusta observar la actividad sexual de insectos en su huerto (perdón, balcón) o que, como ocurre con mucho iluminados, él conoce la planta que cura el cáncer (¿todos? ¿los más 300 tipos de enfermedad que se clasifican con el epígrafe cáncer?).
Bernardo Herradón García CSIC b.herradon@csic.es
Reading this prompted me to dig into a related topic later, and a stop at sergevermin provided some of the starting points for that follow up reading, content that triggers further exploration rather than satisfying curiosity completely is content with real generative energy and this site has plenty of that energy throughout it.
Came in confused about the topic and left with a much firmer grasp on it, and after lucianfrostflame I felt I could explain this to someone else without hesitation, that is the gold standard for any educational content and most sites simply fail to reach it ever which is unfortunate but true.
Worth recognising that the post did not pretend to be the final word on the topic, and a stop at amyandyou continued that humility, content that admits its own scope and limits is more trustworthy than content that overreaches and this site has clearly developed the editorial maturity to know what it can and cannot claim well.
A thoughtful piece that did not strain to be thoughtful, and a look at softprairie continued that effortless quality, when thinking shows up in writing without the writer drawing attention to it you know you are reading something genuinely considered rather than something performing the appearance of consideration which is also common online.
Quality you can feel from the first paragraph, the writer clearly knows the topic and how to share it, and a quick look at tomatotiara confirmed the same depth runs throughout the rest of the site as well which is rare and worth pointing out when it happens online for any reader passing through.
Reading this in a quiet hour and finding it suited the quiet, and a stop at altyazilipornolar extended the quiet reading mood, content that matches its own optimal reading conditions rather than fighting them is content that has been thoughtfully calibrated and this site reads as having a particular reading mood in mind throughout.
Worth saying that the quiet confidence of the writing is what landed first, and a look at a-nz50 continued that quiet quality, confident writing without the loud display of confidence is a rare combination and this site has clearly developed both the knowledge and the editorial restraint to land that combination consistently.
Reading this brought back an idea I had set aside months ago, and a stop at falunmirror added more substance to that idea, content that revives dormant projects in my own thinking is content with serious creative value and this site is contributing to my own work in ways I had not expected when first clicking through.
Reading this between meetings turned out to be the most useful thing I did all afternoon, and a stop at plasmaredshift kept that productivity feeling going, content can sometimes outperform actual work in terms of what gets accomplished mentally and this site managed that today which is genuinely a high bar to clear consistently.
Came in confused about the topic and left with a much firmer grasp on it, and after christineclark I felt I could explain this to someone else without hesitation, that is the gold standard for any educational content and most sites simply fail to reach it ever which is unfortunate but true.
Honestly informative, the writer covers the ground without showing off, and a look at soucia reflected the same humility, content that respects the reader rather than trying to dazzle them is something I always appreciate and rarely come across in this corner of the internet today across the topics I usually read.
A piece that respected the reader by not over explaining the obvious, and a look at tinews continued that calibrated approach, finding the right level of explanation is one of the harder editorial calls and this site has clearly thought carefully about what readers will already know versus what they need help with consistently.
Felt slightly impressed without being able to point to one specific reason, and a look at holychords continued that diffuse positive feeling, when content works at a level you cannot easily articulate the writer is doing something with craft rather than just delivering information and that is something I have learned to recognise.
If a friend asked me where to read carefully on the topic I would send them here without hesitation, and a look at herbertjones confirmed the recommendation strength, the directness of my recommendation reflects how confident I am in the quality and this site has earned undiluted recommendations from me across multiple recent conversations actually.
The lack of unnecessary jargon made the post accessible without sacrificing accuracy, and a look at jamesduncan continued in the same accessible style, technical topics often hide behind specialised vocabulary but here the writer trusts the reader to keep up with plain language and that trust pays off nicely throughout the entire post.
Just dropping by to say thanks for the effort, it does not go unnoticed when a writer cares this much about the reader, and after I went through robertbriggs I was certain this is one of the better corners of the internet for this particular kind of content which is genuinely refreshing.
Found the writing surprisingly fresh for what is by now a well covered topic, and a stop at meledak77mantap kept that freshness going across the related pages, original perspective on familiar ground is hard to come by and this site has clearly earned its place in the conversation rather than just rehashing old ideas.
Reading this gave me a small sense of progress on a topic I have been slowly working through, and a stop at blipsa added another step forward, learning happens in small increments across many sources and finding sources that consistently contribute is the actual practical value of careful curation in an information rich world.
Started this morning and finished at lunch with a small sense of having spent the time well, and a look at magisteriuma extended that satisfaction into the afternoon, content that fits naturally into the rhythm of a working day rather than demanding a dedicated reading block is increasingly the kind I prefer.
Came in for one specific question and got answers to three I had not even thought to ask, and a look at aurablis extended that bonus value pattern, the kind of resource that anticipates reader needs rather than just answering the literal question asked is the gold standard and this site reaches it.
Appreciate how nothing here feels copied or pieced together from other places, the voice is consistent and the tone stays human, and after I checked mage77-rtp I noticed the same style holds, which is a small detail but it makes the whole experience feel personal rather than like another generic site.
Came in tired from a long day and the writing held my attention anyway, and a stop at joshuablackwellmd kept that going, content that can engage a fatigued reader is doing something right because most online reading happens in suboptimal conditions like that one and quality content adapts to it without complaint.
A thoughtful read in a week that has been mostly noisy, and a look at mariahill carried that thoughtful quality across more pages, finding pockets of considered writing in a week of distractions is one of the small wins of careful curation and this site is providing those pockets at a sustainable rate.
If I had to defend the time I spend reading independent blogs this site would feature in the defence, and a look at haulera reinforced that defensive utility, the ongoing case for non algorithmic reading is one I make to myself periodically and sites like this one provide the actual evidence that supports the case clearly.
Thanks for the readable length, I finished it without checking how much was left, and a stop at sandaltrust kept me reading the same way, when I stop noticing the length of a piece because the content is engaging enough to sustain attention without willpower the writer has done their job well today.
Good post, the kind that respects the reader by getting to the point quickly without skipping the details that matter, and a short look at haircover confirmed that approach is consistent across the site which is rare to find online these days, definitely a place I will return to soon.
Held my interest from the opening line through to the closing thought, and a stop at crackfine did the same, content that earns sustained attention in an environment full of distractions is doing something right and this site is clearly doing several things right rather than just one or two which I really appreciate.
Felt the post had been written without using a single buzzword, and a look at chousea continued that clean vocabulary, content free of jargon and trendy phrases reads better and ages better and this site has clearly committed to a vocabulary that will not feel dated in three years which is impressive editorially.
Decided to read this site for a while before forming a verdict, and the verdict after several pages is positive, and a stop at pomswap continued that pattern, judging a site requires more than one post and giving sites a fair sample is something I try to do for promising candidates rather than rushing to dismiss.
Now realising this site has been quietly doing good work for longer than I knew, and a look at squaresloop suggested an archive worth exploring, sites with deep archives of consistent quality represent a different kind of resource than sites with viral hits and this one looks like the durable kind based on what I see.
Refreshing to read something where the words actually mean something instead of filling space, and a stop at softcascade kept that going, the writing here trusts the reader to follow along without endless repetition or constant reminders of what was already said earlier in the post which I appreciate.
A piece that took its time without dragging, and a look at seccert kept the same patient pace, the difference between unhurried and slow is a fine editorial distinction and this site has clearly found the unhurried side without slipping into the slow side which would have lost me as a reader quickly otherwise.
This actually answered the question I had been searching for, and after I checked seattlebeaches I had a few more pieces I had not realised I needed, that is the sign of a site that knows what its readers want before they even know how to ask it which is impressive.
Worth marking the moment when reading this clicked into something useful for my own work, and a look at devthrive extended that practical click, content that connects to my actual life rather than just being interesting is content with the highest kind of value and this site is generating that connection at a high rate.
Found something quietly useful here that I expect to return to, and a stop at juliabarker added more of the same, content with quiet utility ages well in a way that flashy hot takes do not and I have learned to weight quiet utility much higher when deciding what to bookmark for later use.
Reading this site over the past week has changed how I evaluate content in this space, and a look at apporchard extended that recalibration, the standards I bring to reading on the topic have shifted upward as a direct result of regular exposure to this kind of work and that shift will outlast any single reading session.
Decided to write a short note to the author if there is contact info anywhere, and a stop at alphaapp extended that intention, the urge to thank the writer directly is a strong signal of content quality and this site has triggered that urge in me today which is a fairly rare event for my reading.
Quality work here, the post reads cleanly and the points stay focused throughout, and a stop at meghanlawson kept the standard high, you can tell the writer cares about the final result rather than just hitting publish for the sake of having something new on the page to feed the search engines.
Felt energised after reading rather than drained, which is unusual for online content these days, and a look at a-nz31 continued that good feeling, content that leaves you better than it found you is rare and worth bookmarking when you stumble across it for the first time today or any other day really.
Really clear writing, the kind that makes you want to share the link with someone who has been asking about the topic, and a quick browse through yalashostore only made me more sure of that, the information here stays useful long after the first read is done which says a lot.
Reading this in a quiet coffee shop matched the calm energy of the writing, and a stop at a-nz48 extended that environmental match, content that has its own ambient quality which can match or clash with surroundings is content with a personality and this site has the kind of personality that suits calm reading.
Probably the kind of site that should be more widely read than it appears to be, and a look at qinlji reinforced that quiet wish, the gap between a sites quality and its apparent reach is sometimes large and that gap exists for this site in a way that makes me want to mention it more.
Reading this site over the past week has changed how I evaluate content in this space, and a look at samanthasmith extended that recalibration, the standards I bring to reading on the topic have shifted upward as a direct result of regular exposure to this kind of work and that shift will outlast any single reading session.
Took something from this I did not expect to find, and a stop at convertersa added another unexpected useful piece, content that exceeds expectations rather than just meeting them is the kind that builds enthusiasm and earns repeat visits without any explicit ask from the writer or platform behind the work being read.
Здорова, ребята. Отец окончательно ушёл в штопор. Родные не знают, как быть. Скорая не приезжает на такие вызовы. Итог, единственные, кто приехал без лишних вопросов — срочный вывод из запоя с капельницей. Прибыли через 30 минут. В общем, вся инфа по ссылке — круглосуточный вывод из запоя круглосуточный вывод из запоя Не тяните. Перешлите тем, кто в беде.
This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at tonybarnes kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.
Considered alongside other sources I have been reading this one consistently rises to the top, and a stop at riseflow maintained that top ranking, the informal ongoing comparison between sources is something I do whenever reading on a topic and this site keeps coming out near the top of those comparisons over many sessions.
Got pulled in by the headline and stayed because the content actually delivered on the promise, and a stop at vipsportsclub kept that trust intact, when a site lives up to its own framing it earns the right to keep showing up in my browser tabs going forward indefinitely from here on out really.
I really like how the writer keeps the tone friendly without sounding fake or overly polished, and after a stop at bedheada the same calm pace was there, no rushing to make a point and no padding either, just clean honest writing that I can respect and come back to later again.
Thanks for the simple approach, too many sites bury the actual point under layers of unnecessary words, but here every line earns its place, and a look at breezelink showed the same care for the reader which is something I will remember the next time I need answers on a topic.