Los peligros de la ignorancia científica
Hasta ahora he considerado a La Vanguardia como un periódico serio. Sin embargo, en los últimos tiempos están dando cobijo a una serie de personajes que propagan sus ideas pseudocientíficas en sus venerable páginas.
Lo último que me ha llegado, se publicó el pasado 30 de mayo. Una entrevista a un ¿divulgador? y ¿agricultor ecológico? que afirma «Estamos comiendo petróleo«.
Claro, leí el titular y pensé que la entrevista se la estaban haciendo a un microorganismo extremófilo, de esos raros que son capaces de comerse las porquerías que dejó el maldito Prestige (sí, ese; se acuerdan, el de «los hilitos» que dijo un tal M. Rajoy Brey) en nuestras costas gallegas; y que esa afirmación estaba dirigida a sus congérenes, y otras especies relacionadas, devoradoras de hidrocarburos.
Pero no es un bichito de esos que le gustan a mis amigos los (micro)biólogos. Al menos por la foto de la entrevista, no es un microorganismo; sino que es, aparentemente, un individuo de nuestra especie (homo ¿sapiens?). Bueno, pienso «ha sido una exageración del periodista que ha querido sacar un titular de una frase inocua del entrevistado«.
¡¡¡Pero no!!! Este tal señor agricultor ¿ecológico? y ¿divulgador? lo dice en la entrevista. A continuación reproduzco literalmente la pregunta y la respuesta:
P.: Incluso hay productos, según explica usted, que… ¡llevan petróleo!
R.: Efectivamente. De hecho, algo más del 90% de los productos de síntesis química (insecticidas, herbicidas, todo lo que no son productos agroecológicos) provienen todos del petróleo. Sin saberlo, estamos comiendo petróleo. Evidentemente, te lo comes tan disgregado que no te lo parece, pero lo estás haciendo.
Como se ve, no hay lugar para la duda.
Y esa respuesta demuestra que este individuo es un profundo ignorante científico. Y que conste que lo de ignorante no es insulto, sino que es el significado del diccionario de la RAE para «el que no tiene noticia de algo«.
Y este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? tiene una profunda ignorancia de química. No voy a darle ninguna lección de química (que se compre un libro para aprender), sólo decirle que la química es la ciencia de la transformación de la materia y que cuando A se transforma en B; A y B son dos sustancias químicas distintas (como si fuesen dos letras distintas del alfabeto) y, por consiguiente, sus propiedades (químicas, físicas, biológicas, tecnológicas) son también distintas.
Le voy a poner un ejemplo sencillo, que usted, señor agricultor ¿ecológico? puede entender.
El hidrógeno es un gas, explosivo por más señas. Si respiramos hidrógeno, morimos, al menos asfixiados, aunque podríamos tener una muerte aún más cruenta.
El oxígeno es también un gas. Es esencial para nuestra vida; pero, eso sí, mezclado con otro gas (el nitrógeno) en una proporción aproximada de 4 a 1 (exactamente 78 a 21) formando el aire (el 1% restante es mezcla de otros gases). Aunque el oxígeno es fundamental para nuestra existencia, en estado puro es un veneno potente para el ser humano y si lo ingerimos puro y en cantidad, tendríamos una muerte segura, y además espectacular (más o menos como una falla valenciana).
Pero, ¿qué ocurre si mezclamos estos dos gases (hidrógeno y oxígeno) tan peligrosos? ¡Se forma agua! Un líquido, no tóxico y esencial para la vida. Una reacción química hace que dos gases extremadamente peligrosos se combinen dando lugar a un ¡líquido esencial para la vida!
Espero que este ejemplo aporte alguna luz a su ignorancia química y se dé cuenta de que una vez que un derivado del petróleo se transforma químicamente, las propiedades de lo que se obtiene no tiene nada que ver con el material de partida y, mucho menos con el petróleo que antes de estos procesos se somete a una destilación para separar componentes.
Para su información, los compuestos químicos más sencillos que se encuentran en el petróleo son el metano y el etileno. El metano da poco juego en la preparación de sustancias químicas sintéticas; aunque sí para proporcionarnos energía, que este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? usará; pues no creo que se caliente con la madera de sus bosques o no encienda ni una bombilla en su casa.
El etileno es un material de partida importante para la industria química de la que el señor agricultor ¿ecológico? se beneficia; o ¿es que va desnudo por la vida o no usa un simple bolígrafo para escribir o un ordenador o un teléfono móvil? cuando enferma ¿qué toma?
Las interrogantes en agricultor ¿ecológico? no son un error de mi teclado. ¡No! Son intencionadas. No voy a entrar con discutir a los defensores de una cierta manera de cultivar los campos (para eso están Mulet o JAL); pero sí me molesta que se falsee la terminología. Agricultura ecológica es un oxímoron, pues desde el momento en que un campo se cultiva (es decir, se hace agricultura) se deja de hacer ecologismo al estar manipulado por la mano del hombre. Por lo tanto, la agricultura ecológica no existe.
Este hombre tiene una propuesta curiosa. Propone que todos debemos plantar un huerto (por ejemplo, de lechugas; aunque es más ambicioso y propone variedad de cultivo) en nuestros balcones y terrazas. Si estáis interesado en esta ideas (no voy a entrar a valorarla para que no me dé un ataque de risa) u os preguntáis como se puede alimentar una familia con esta ¿abundante? cosecha, recomiendo leer la blanda entrevista.
Yo voy a seguir con lo mío: la QUÍMICA (¡con mayúsculas!) y por desgracia con la ignorancia del señor agricultor ¿ecológico?
Propone plantar huertos ecológicos en los balcones de las viviendas para de esta manera «no tener que comer petróleo». Teniendo en cuenta el escaso conocimiento químico que este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? ha demostrado, no esperaba de él un mínimo conocimiento bioquímico.
Le digo a este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? que cuando coma la lechuga de su huerto (perdón, balcón) también está comiendo petróleo. Si este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? está leyendo este post se le quedarán los ojos como platos. «¿Comer petróleo? ¡¡¡Si todo es super-mega-ultra-ecológico!!!«, me responderá.
Si, señor agricultor ¿ecológico?, según su conocimiento de química, usted está comiendo petróleo cuando se come su lechuga. «¿Por qué?» Me preguntará el señor agricultor ¿ecológico?. La respuesta es sencilla. Usted se come la lechuga; principalmente está comiendo carbohidratos (y otras sustancias químicas) que se han sintetizado (sé que la palabra le horroriza, pero es verdad) por las células de la planta. Y usted me contestará «que todo es muy natural, muy eco y muy bio» Yo le contestaré «¿Y sabe usted de dónde procede el carbono de los carbohidratos de la lechuga que se está comiendo?» Teniendo en cuenta sus conocimientos de química, su respuesta será «No» y en ese momento yo le contestaré (con una media sonrisa) «Del CO2, también conocido como dióxido de carbono o anhídrido carbónico» Y este señor agricultor ¿ecológico? se echará a temblar, pues le he nombrado a una de sus bestias negras, el CO2. Y además, le digo que ese CO2 procede de la combustión de derivados de hidrocarburos en automóviles o centrales térmicas; es decir, del petróleo.
Por lo tanto, sintiéndolo mucho, señor agricultor ¿ecológico?; usted también come petróleo de su huerto (perdón, balcón). Sólo tiene una alternativa, no comer. Claro, así seguro que se muere pronto (eso sí, sin estar químicamente contaminado); o más fácil, no vuelva a exponer su ignorancia científica en los medios de comunicación.
Nota tras el post químico. Aunque he preferido centrarme en los aspectos químicos de la entrevista, ésta no tiene desperdicio. Como cuando dice que hay que cortar el cesped cuando la Luna esté en la constelación de Gémini (triste es que un periódico serio publique esto, que parece una broma) o como le gusta observar la actividad sexual de insectos en su huerto (perdón, balcón) o que, como ocurre con mucho iluminados, él conoce la planta que cura el cáncer (¿todos? ¿los más 300 tipos de enfermedad que se clasifican con el epígrafe cáncer?).
Bernardo Herradón García CSIC b.herradon@csic.es
Closed the laptop and walked away thinking about the post for a good twenty minutes, and a stop at growthmovesforwardclean produced similar lingering thoughts, content that survives the closing of the browser tab is content that has actually entered the mind rather than just decorating the screen for the duration of the reading.
Now recognising the post as a rare example of careful writing on a topic that mostly receives careless treatment, and a stop at professionalgrowthbond extended that contrast with the average elsewhere, content that highlights how much the average is settling for low quality is content that has both internal merit and external value as a benchmark.
My friends would appreciate a few of these posts and I will be sending links accordingly, and a look at claritysetsdirection added more pages to my share queue, content that earns shares to specific people in specific contexts is content with social utility and this site is generating those targeted shares from me consistently lately.
Found the use of subheadings really helpful for scanning back through the post later, and a stop at growthflowsbydesign kept that reader friendly approach going, navigation is something many blog writers ignore but small structural choices make a noticeable difference for someone returning to find a specific point again days or weeks later.
Now placing this in the same category as a few other sites I have come to trust, and a look at actionbuildsforwardpath continued the placement decision, the small category of fully trusted sites is one I extend rarely and only after multiple positive reading sessions and this site has earned the category placement methodically over time.
Felt the post handled a sensitive angle of the topic with appropriate care, and a look at nexustrustgroup extended that careful handling across related material, sites that can navigate delicate territory without causing damage are rare and require a level of judgement that comes from experience rather than from following any clear playbook.
Generally I find the content on similar topics frustrating in specific ways and this post avoided all of them, and a look at visionalignment continued that frustration free experience, content that sidesteps the standard failure modes of its genre is content with editorial awareness and this site has clearly studied what fails elsewhere consistently.
Really appreciate that the writer did not overstate the importance of the topic to make the post feel weightier, and a quick visit to growthmoveswithfocus maintained the same modest framing, content that is honest about its own scope rather than inflating itself is the kind I trust and return to repeatedly over time.
Closed it feeling I had taken something away rather than just consumed something, and a stop at strategylogic extended that taking away feeling, the difference between content I extract value from and content I just pass through is something I track informally and this site is consistently in the value extraction column for me.
Thanks for the simple approach, too many sites bury the actual point under layers of unnecessary words, but here every line earns its place, and a look at focusnavigator showed the same care for the reader which is something I will remember the next time I need answers on a topic.
Really appreciate this kind of writing, no shouting and no clickbait headlines just steady useful content, and a quick look at idearouting kept that going, definitely a site I will be returning to whenever I need a sensible take on similar topics in the days ahead and also during slower work weeks.
Thanks for keeping the writing direct without losing the warmth that makes content feel human, and a stop at capitaltrustbond carried both qualities forward, balancing professionalism and personality is a rare skill and the writers here have clearly figured out how to consistently land it across many posts which I notice.
During my morning reading slot this fit perfectly into the routine, and a look at momentumcraft extended that perfect fit into the rest of the routine, content that matches the rhythm of how I actually read rather than demanding accommodation from my schedule is content well calibrated to its likely audience and this site has it.
If I were grading sites on this topic this one would receive high marks, and a stop at visionprogression continued earning those high marks, the informal grading I do mentally for content sources is something I take seriously even though it is informal and this site has been receiving consistent high marks across multiple sessions today.
Picked up on several small touches that suggest a careful editor, and a look at professionalbondnetwork suggested the same hand at work across the broader site, editorial consistency at a granular level is one of the strongest signs that an operation is serious rather than just hobbyist and this site reads as serious throughout.
A memorable post for me on a topic I had thought I was tired of, and a look at claritydrivenchoices suggested the same site can refresh other tired topics, sites that can revive my interest in subjects I had written off as exhausted are doing rare work and this one is clearly doing that for me today.
Picked up on several small touches that suggest a careful editor, and a look at elitepartnershipnetwork suggested the same hand at work across the broader site, editorial consistency at a granular level is one of the strongest signs that an operation is serious rather than just hobbyist and this site reads as serious throughout.
I appreciate the clarity here, everything is explained in simple terms without unnecessary detail, and after a quick stop at strategicgrowthbond the points came together nicely for me, the writing keeps things straightforward and respects the reader from start to finish without ever talking down to anyone.
More substantial than most of what I find searching for this topic online, and a stop at focusdefinesmomentum kept that quality consistent, this is one of those sites where the writing actually rewards careful reading rather than punishing the patient reader with empty filler stretched out across long paragraphs that say very little.
Reading the writers other posts after this one suggests the quality is consistent rather than peak, and a stop at focusfeedsmomentum confirmed the consistent quality reading, sites that hold the same level across many pieces rather than peaking on a few are sites with sustainable editorial discipline and this one has clearly developed that.
Decided to write a short note to the author if there is contact info anywhere, and a stop at focusactivation extended that intention, the urge to thank the writer directly is a strong signal of content quality and this site has triggered that urge in me today which is a fairly rare event for my reading.
Now sitting with the thoughts the post triggered rather than rushing on to the next thing, and a stop at globaltrustalliance extended that reflective pause, content that earns time for thought after closing the tab is content of higher value than the merely interesting and this site has clearly produced that lasting effect today.
Decided to set aside time later to read more carefully, and a stop at claritymovement reinforced that decision, content that earns a calendar entry rather than just a passing read is in a different tier altogether and this site is clearly working at that elevated level which I really do appreciate as a reader today.
A piece that took its time without dragging, and a look at signalunlocksprogress kept the same patient pace, the difference between unhurried and slow is a fine editorial distinction and this site has clearly found the unhurried side without slipping into the slow side which would have lost me as a reader quickly otherwise.
Worth pointing out the careful word choice in this post, no buzzwords and no jargon, and a look at clarityactivator continued that disciplined vocabulary, sites that resist the pull of trendy language are sites that will read well in five years and this one is clearly built for that kind of long durability.
Glad I stumbled across this post, the explanations actually make sense without needing background knowledge to follow along, and after a stop at growthflowswithsignal the same was true there, no assumptions about the reader just clear writing that anyone can understand from the first line right through to the end.
Stayed longer than planned because each section earned the next, and a look at claritystrategy kept that pulling effect going across more pages, the kind of subtle pull that good writing exerts on attention is something I find harder and harder to resist when I encounter it on the open web today.
Refreshing to read something where the words actually mean something instead of filling space, and a stop at unitedcapitalbond kept that going, the writing here trusts the reader to follow along without endless repetition or constant reminders of what was already said earlier in the post which I appreciate.
Glad I clicked through from where I did because this turned out to be worth the time spent, and after actiondrivesdirection I had a fuller picture, the kind of content that earns its visitors through delivering value rather than chasing them through aggressive advertising or constant pop ups appearing everywhere on the screen lately.
Speaking from the perspective of having read widely on the topic this site offers something distinct, and a look at signalpowersgrowth reinforced that distinctness, the rare site that contributes something genuinely original to a saturated topic is the rare site worth following carefully and this one has demonstrated that original contribution capability today.
Skimmed first and then went back to read carefully, and the careful read paid off in places I had missed, and a stop at progressactivator got the same treatment, the rare site whose content rewards a second pass is content I want more of in my regular rotation rather than disposable single read articles.
Started forming counter examples to test the claims and the post handled most of them implicitly, and a look at claritynavigator continued that anticipatory style, writers who think two steps ahead of the critical reader save themselves from a lot of follow up work and this writer has clearly internalised that habit consistently.
Looking back on this reading session it stands as one of the better ones recently, and a look at directionalstructure extended that ranking, the informal ranking of reading sessions against each other is something I do mentally and this session ranks high largely because of this site and a couple of related pages here.
Came away with some new perspectives I had not considered before, and after securepathbond those ideas felt more complete, the kind of content that stays with you a little while after reading rather than slipping out the moment you switch tabs and move on with your day to whatever comes next.
Skipped breakfast still reading this and finished hungry but satisfied, and a stop at actioncreatesvelocity kept me past breakfast time, content that displaces basic biological needs is content with serious attentional pull and the writers here are clearly capable of producing that level of engagement which is genuinely impressive these days.
If I had to summarise the editorial sensibility of this site in a few words it would be careful and human, and a look at globalcollaborationhub extended that summary feeling, capturing the essence of a sites approach in brief is hard but this site has a clear enough identity that the summary comes naturally enough.
I really like the calm tone here, it does not push anything on the reader, and after I went through strategicpartnergroup I felt the same way, just steady useful content laid out without drama, which is exactly what someone trying to learn something quickly needs to find rather than aggressive marketing.
Reading this slowly and letting each paragraph land before moving on, and a stop at trustedlineage earned the same patient approach, content that rewards slow reading rather than speed is content with real density and the writers here are clearly producing work that benefits from the careful eye rather than the rushed scan.
Now adjusting my mental model of how the topic fits into the broader landscape, and a look at forwardenergyactivated extended that adjustment, content that affects my structural understanding rather than just my factual knowledge is content with deeper impact and this site is providing those structural updates at a meaningful rate consistently across topics.
Picked a friend mentally as the audience for this and decided to send the link, and a look at signalfeedsaction confirmed the send was the right choice, choosing whom to share content with is a small act of curation that I take more seriously than the public sharing most platforms encourage these days online.
Now thinking the topic is more interesting than I had given it credit for, and a stop at directionamplifiesmotion continued that elevated interest, content that revives my curiosity about subjects I had set aside is doing genuine work in the structure of my interests and this site is providing that revivifying effect today actually.
Now wondering how the writers calibrated the level of detail so well, and a stop at growthpathway continued the same calibration, the right level of detail is one of the harder editorial calls in any piece and this site has clearly developed an instinct for it through what I assume is years of careful practice publicly.
This one is staying open in a tab for the rest of the day so I can come back and re read certain parts, and a look at strategyalignmenthub suggests I will be doing the same with a few more pages here too, this is going to be a deep dive over the coming hours.
A thoughtful read in a week that has been mostly noisy, and a look at ideaprocessing carried that thoughtful quality across more pages, finding pockets of considered writing in a week of distractions is one of the small wins of careful curation and this site is providing those pockets at a sustainable rate.
Now realising this site has been quietly doing good work for longer than I knew, and a look at bondedhorizons suggested an archive worth exploring, sites with deep archives of consistent quality represent a different kind of resource than sites with viral hits and this one looks like the durable kind based on what I see.
Good clean post, no errors and no awkward phrasing that breaks the reading flow, and a stop at forwardmovementlab kept the same standard, definitely the kind of editorial care that earns a return visit because it tells me the writer is paying attention to details that matter to readers rather than just rushing publication.
A piece that exhibited the kind of patience that good writing requires, and a look at actionstarter continued that patient quality, hurried writing is easy to spot and this site reads as having been written without time pressure which produces a different feel than the rushed content that dominates much of the modern blog space.
Decided this was the best thing I had read all morning, and a stop at growthmovesintentionally kept that ranking intact, ranking my reading is something I do mentally throughout the day and the top rank is competitive and not easily won but this site won it without needing to overstate its claims for that.
Came in skeptical of the angle and left mostly persuaded, and a stop at clarityguidesmovement pushed me a bit further in the same direction, content that can move a critical reader by argument rather than rhetoric is rare and worth pointing out because it indicates real substance underneath the surface presentation here.
Thanks for taking the time to write this, it is clear that some thought went into how each point would land, and after I went through focustrajectory I had a better grip on the topic, real value without the usual marketing noise people have to put up with online when searching for answers.