![]()
Otra vez los índices de impacto y su significado
En este blog he insistido en el hecho de que ya no se evalúa la ciencia por lo que se publica, si no dónde se publica y nos limitamos a «sumar» o «promediar» índices de impacto (Impact Factor, IF) de las revistas en las que se publica en vez de valorar el artículo individualmente. También he insistido en que los IFs se usan «alegremente», muchas veces sin conocer su significado real.
Hoy traigo a esta página un ejemplo espectacular que nos tiene que hacer reflexionar sobre el valor que puede tener el IF de las publicaciones científicas.
Se acaba de publicar el IF correspondiente a los artículos publicados en 2008. Y hay un cambio espectacular. La revista Acta Crystallographica Section A (Foundations of Crystallography) ha aumentado su IF en casi 25 veces, pasado de un digno 2’05 a un espectacular 49’93. ¿Por qué ha sido esto? ¿Ha aumentado la calidad de los artículos publicado? ¿Ha aumentado la exigencia del editor?
NO. La razón es que se ha publicado un artículo excelente y que toda la comunidad cristalográfica llevaba años esperando: A short history of SHELX por George M. Sheldrick, el «inventor» del programa SHELX, que es la herramienta computacional fundamental para refinar estructuras cristalográficas. Este artículo ha sido citado 6653 veces (a 25 de junio de 2010), con casi 6000 citas entre 2008 y 2009.
El segundo artículo más citado de Acta Crystallographica Section A ha sido citado 31 veces, el 10º más citado, 11 veces; hay 17 artículos que han sido citado 2 o una vez y hay 19 artículos que no han sido citados (de un total de 72 artículos publicados en 2008).
Como ya he pedido en este blog, leamos las publicaciones y veamos cuanto se ha citado cada artículo individualmente; especialmente, cuando tengamo que evaluar CVs para plazas, contratos, etc. Si seguimos teniendo en cuenta solo el índice de impacto de las revista, cometeremos injusticias. Si no cambiamos el sistema, solo me queda felicitar a los que hayan publicado en 2008 en Acta Crystallographica Section A, pues tendrán artículos con un IF de casi 50, aunque nunca haya sido citado.
P. D.: Por cierto, os habréis fijado que, sin cambiar prácticamente, la revista ha pasado de ser casi despreciada por los que solo publican por índice de impacto a ser una revista «excelente».
Bernardo Herradón
IQOG-CSIC
Picked this site to mention to a colleague who would benefit, and a look at dataorchard added more material I will pass along, recommending sites to colleagues is a higher bar than recommending to friends because the professional context demands more careful curation and this site cleared the professional bar without me having to think.
Found this useful, the points line up well with what I have been thinking about lately, and a stop at davidmartin added some angles I had not considered yet, definitely walking away with more than I came for which is the best outcome from time spent reading online for any kind of topic.
Once I had read three posts the editorial pattern was clear, and a look at lovetobuyz confirmed the pattern from a fourth angle, sites where the underlying approach reveals itself through accumulated reading rather than being announced are sites with real depth and this one has that quality clearly visible across multiple pieces consistently.
Highly recommend to anyone looking for a sensible take on this topic without the usual marketing nonsense, and a look at orderright kept that grounded approach going, sites that stay focused on serving readers rather than monetising every click are rare and this is clearly one of those rare ones I really appreciate finding.
During the time spent here I noticed the absence of the usual distractions, and a stop at sibbertoft extended that distraction free experience, content that does not fight my attention with pop ups and modals and aggressive prompts is content that respects me and this site has clearly chosen the respectful approach throughout.
Reading this on the train into work was a better use of the commute than my usual choices, and a stop at ashleyaustin extended that commute reading well, content that improves transit time rather than just filling it is content with practical benefit and this site has earned its place in my morning commute reading rotation.
Reading this in pieces over a coffee break and finding it consistently rewarding, and a stop at softsavanna extended that into related material I will return to later, the kind of site that fits naturally into small reading windows without requiring a long uninterrupted block is genuinely useful for how I actually browse.
Most of the time I bounce off similar pages within seconds, and a stop at bucksfan held me longer than I would have predicted, the ability to convert a likely bouncing visitor into an engaged reader is a quality signal and this site has demonstrated that conversion ability across multiple visits where I expected to bounce.
Most blog writing on this subject reaches for the same handful of arguments and this post avoided them, and a look at sleeppower continued the original treatment, content that finds its own path through territory other writers have flattened is content with real authorial energy and this site has plenty of that distinctive energy.
Now wishing I had found this site sooner, and a look at kevingriffin extended that mild regret, the calculation of how many years of good content I missed by not finding the right sources earlier is one I try not to make too often but it does come up sometimes when I find sites this good.
Reading this in a quiet coffee shop matched the calm energy of the writing, and a stop at solarlink extended that environmental match, content that has its own ambient quality which can match or clash with surroundings is content with a personality and this site has the kind of personality that suits calm reading.
Pass this along to colleagues if the topic comes up, the framing here is sensible, and a stop at a-nz39 adds more useful angles to share, the kind of content that improves conversations rather than just feeding them is what makes a resource genuinely valuable in professional contexts going forward over time and across project boundaries too.
Even on a quick first read the substance of the post comes through, and a look at larrywatkins reinforced that immediate quality, content that does not require a slow careful read to demonstrate value but rewards one anyway is content with real depth and this site has produced work of that demanding depth class.
Reading this post made me realise I had been settling for lower quality elsewhere, and a look at multiproducta extended that recalibration, content that exposes how much I had been accepting in adjacent sources is content with calibrating effect on my standards and this site is performing that calibration function across topics for me reliably.
Looking at this objectively the editorial quality is hard to deny even setting aside personal taste, and a stop at expoteco maintained the same objective quality, the gap between what I personally enjoy and what is objectively well crafted exists and this site clears both bars simultaneously which is rarer than it sounds.
The way the post stayed on topic throughout without going on tangents was really refreshing, and a look at tidytrace kept that focused approach going, discipline like this in writing is rare and worth recognising because most writers cannot resist wandering off into related subjects that dilute their main point and confuse readers along the way.
Comfortable reading experience throughout, no jarring tone shifts and no awkward formatting, and a look at vertolink kept that smooth feel going, the kind of editorial polish that goes unnoticed when present but glaring when absent is something this site has clearly invested in across the broader content as well which deserves recognition.
Closed it feeling slightly more competent in the topic than I started, and a stop at bostonclimbers reinforced that competence boost, real learning is rare in casual online reading but it does happen sometimes and this site managed to make it happen for me today which is genuinely worth pausing to acknowledge.
I really like the calm tone here, it does not push anything on the reader, and after I went through radicalweb I felt the same way, just steady useful content laid out without drama, which is exactly what someone trying to learn something quickly needs to find rather than aggressive marketing.
Now recognising the specific pleasure of reading writing that shows real care for sentence shapes, and a look at ordertool extended that craft pleasure, sentence level writing quality is something most blog content ignores entirely and this site has clearly invested in the prose layer alongside the substance which is rare today.
Really clear writing, the kind that makes you want to share the link with someone who has been asking about the topic, and a quick browse through robertcampbell only made me more sure of that, the information here stays useful long after the first read is done which says a lot.
Came away with a small but real shift in perspective on the topic, and a stop at appcrown pushed that shift a bit further, the kind of subtle reframing that good writing does to a reader without making a big deal of it is something I always appreciate when it happens which is sadly not that often.
Well crafted post, the structure flows naturally from one point to the next without forcing transitions, and a stop at katherinekrause kept the same flow going, you can tell when a writer has thought about how their content reads rather than just what it contains and this is one of those examples.
Picked up two new ideas that I expect will come up in conversations this week, and a look at softpalm added another, content that arms me with talking points rather than just filling time is the kind that provides ongoing value beyond the moment of reading and this site is generating that kind of ongoing value.
Found something new in here that I had not seen explained this way before, and a quick stop at apparmor expanded the idea even further, the kind of writing that nudges your thinking forward a bit without forcing the issue is exactly what I look for online today and rarely actually find anywhere.
Taking the time to read carefully here has been worthwhile for the past hour, and a look at habbea extended the worthwhile reading, the calculation of return on reading time spent is something I do informally and this site has been producing positive returns across multiple sessions during the last week of regular visits and reads.
Came here from another site and ended up exploring much further than I planned, and a look at pananole only encouraged more exploration, the kind of place where one click leads to another not through manipulative design but through genuinely interesting content is rare and worth highlighting when found like this somewhere on the open internet.
Closed the tab and immediately reopened it ten minutes later because I wanted to reread a part, and a stop at auroraopera drew the same return, content that pulls you back after closing it is doing something well beyond the average and worth marking as exceptional in my mental catalogue of reliable sites.
Now feeling the rare pleasure of trusting a source completely on first encounter, and a look at softfortune extended that initial trust into something more durable, the calibration of trust to evidence is something I do informally and this site has earned high trust through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good posts already.
The depth of coverage felt about right for the format, neither shallow nor overwhelming, and a look at johnpadilla kept that calibration going, getting the depth right for blog format is genuinely difficult because too shallow loses experts and too deep loses beginners but this site nailed it nicely which I really do appreciate.
Found the rhythm of the prose particularly enjoyable on this read through, and a look at a-nz46 kept that musical quality going across the related pages, sentence rhythm is something most blog writers ignore but it makes a real difference in how content lands with the careful reader who cares.
A clear case of writing that does not try to do too much in one post, and a look at zealwork maintained the same scoped discipline, posts that try to cover too much end up covering nothing well and this site has clearly chosen scope discipline as a core editorial principle which shows up clearly in what I read.
Top tier post, the kind that makes you want to share the link with friends working in the same area, and a stop at physicsgoldmine only made me more confident in doing that, this site is one of the better resources I have seen on the topic recently across both new and older posts.
Now planning to recommend this site in a context where my recommendations are taken seriously, and a stop at zincbyte confirmed I should make that recommendation soon, the small but real act of recommending content into spaces where my taste matters is something I take seriously and this site is worth the recommendation.
If I were grading sites on this topic this one would receive high marks, and a stop at devomega continued earning those high marks, the informal grading I do mentally for content sources is something I take seriously even though it is informal and this site has been receiving consistent high marks across multiple sessions today.
If I had to summarise the editorial sensibility of this site in a few words it would be careful and human, and a look at drgregorythompson extended that summary feeling, capturing the essence of a sites approach in brief is hard but this site has a clear enough identity that the summary comes naturally enough.
Now feeling slightly more committed to my own careful reading practices having read this, and a stop at a-nz34 reinforced that commitment, content that models the kind of attention it deserves is content that calibrates the reader and this site has clearly raised my own bar for what to bring to good writing today.
Closed the tab feeling I had spent the time well, and a stop at zonezero extended that feeling across more pages, the test of whether time on a site was well spent is one I apply silently after closing tabs and very few sites pass it but this one passed it cleanly today afternoon clearly.
If you asked me to point to a recent positive sign for the open web this site would be near the top, and a stop at dylanbell reinforced that designation, the few sites that serve as evidence the web can still produce quality independent content are precious and this one has clearly become one for me.
Now appreciating that the post did not require me to agree with the writer to find it valuable, and a look at joshuayoder maintained the same useful regardless of agreement quality, content that informs even when it does not convince is content with broader utility and this site reads as useful even when I disagree.
Felt the post was written for someone like me without explicitly addressing me, and a look at edwardmyers produced the same fit, when content lands on its target without pandering you know the writer has done careful audience thinking rather than relying on demographic targeting or interest signals to do the work of editorial decisions.
Loved the writing voice here, friendly without being fake and confident without being arrogant, and a stop at luisallen carried the same tone forward, the kind of personality that makes a reader feel welcome rather than lectured at which is a balance plenty of writers struggle to find no matter how long they have been at it.
A piece that reads as if the writer trusted readers to fill in obvious gaps, and a look at workkit continued that respectful approach, content that does not over explain what the reader can infer is content that respects intelligence and this site has clearly chosen to write to capable readers rather than to the lowest common denominator.
Once I had read three posts the editorial pattern was clear, and a look at earthingshoes confirmed the pattern from a fourth angle, sites where the underlying approach reveals itself through accumulated reading rather than being announced are sites with real depth and this one has that quality clearly visible across multiple pieces consistently.
Reading this with my morning coffee turned into reading the related posts with my morning coffee, and a stop at weretail stretched the morning further, content that pulls breakfast into a reading session rather than just accompanying it is content that has earned a higher claim on my attention than the average article does.
Great work on keeping things readable, the post never drags or repeats itself which I really appreciate, and a stop at richardmorales added a bit more context that fit naturally with what was already said here, no need to read everything twice to get the point being made today.
Decided I would read the archives over the weekend, and a stop at blog44fast confirmed that the archives would be worth the time, very few sites have archives I would actively read through but this one has earned that level of interest based on the consistent quality across what I have sampled so far.
Worth recommending broadly to anyone who reads on the topic, and a look at heidiharrington only confirms that, the rare combination of accessibility and depth in this site makes it suitable for both newcomers and people who already know the area which is hard to pull off in any blog format today and rarely managed.
Solid information that lines up with what I have been hearing from other reliable sources, and after my visit to appalpha I was even more certain of that, this site checks out which is something I value highly when so many places online play loose with the facts to chase a quick click.
Worth pointing out that the writer made the topic feel more interesting than I had been expecting, and a look at puntersa continued that elevation effect, content that improves the apparent quality of its subject through skilled treatment is doing something real and this site has clearly developed that kind of editorial alchemy throughout.